So? Too bad conservatives have no ideas to solve the myriad problems left us by G.W and his pals.
The New Right represents a great threat to our nation's traditions, values and democratic institutions. They have wrapped themselves in the American Flag, and while holding the cross of Christianity, they have soiled everything those symbols represent.
That is so true.
Interesting. So what traditions and values do you speak of? Marriage? Women dressing like women and men dressing like men? Two-parent families? Self reliance? Personal responsibility?
Seems to me those are Republican values. All of the above were attacked by the libs on the left at one time or another. Of course we can keep adding to that list. You know, like the tradition of men using the mens room and women using the women's room. Liberals today want grown men taking showers with our 14 year old daughters and granddaughters. But of course, it's the Republicans that have the war on women, isn't that right Dean????
Q. what traditions and values do you speak of?
A. Liberty, the freedom to be oneself, be happy, have equal opportunities, not to be discriminated against by laws passed to restrict their rights, justified by the canard that discrimination is simply an example of someone practicing their principles.
I'd like to see dishonest bigots cease their constant hate and fear rhetoric ("Liberals today want grown men taking showers with our 14 year old daughters and granddaughters.) which are not only stupid but foolish, since no one with any sense believes such nonsense.
Hey
eddiew, what year did Clinton reduce our national debt?
He reduced the deficit.
I would like to apply the principle about dishonest statements that you espoused in your prior paragraph to your last statement. It is partially dishonest to say that Clinton reduced the deficit. It is honest to say that Clinton and the Republican Congress reduced the deficit. Did Clinton in fact propose budgets with declining deficits, or did he propose budgets with higher deficits that were then sent back to him with lower deficits? IOW, did he lead the way to reduced deficits or did he follow Congress' leadership?
I can't answer those questions, but I can respond to the issue. Congress has a duty to pass a budget, and that process requires two political parties and the two chambers to come together with a plan (a budget, as those who have had to put one together and make adjustments as the fy progresses; I understand a budget is not set in stone).
That I did not include the R's in Congress, the Democrats and blue dogs in my post was not an attempt to mislead anyone, as I assumed most people on a political message board understand the process. Of course the President provides The Congress his ideas for policy and his priorities, that too most understand.
BTW, I advocate a Constitutional Amendment giving POTUS the Line-Item Veto, it will not take politics out of the budget process, but it will be much more transparent than the current process. Allowing Congress to restore items by an override of each singular blue lined item, puts a flashlight on the process and makes each actor responsible for the final result.