Zone1 Why do people still believe in evolution?

Midnight FM

Gold Member
Joined
May 4, 2025
Messages
797
Reaction score
349
Points
143
Evolution is an outdated, Victorian era theory. Today we have structural-systematic philosophy, which I believe proves the existence of God:


We should consider removing evolution from public education and replacing it with structural-systematic philosophy, which I believe provides a more contemporary, 21st century understanding of the existence of God.
 
As an atheist, I find evolution, which hasn't been classified as a "theory" but fact for years now, as far more realistic than a great big invisible thingy in the sky that sees all, knows all and can do all, but somehow gets still makes mistakes in creating things.
Religion is a hackneyed fall back on something that couldn't be answered at the time.
As science progressed, things which were attributed to deities, began getting chipped away, piece by piece. Don't know how something happened? God did it! The old fill in the blank scenario.
In evolution, you find gradual changes in remains over eons of time due to environmental and other changes.
 
Hilarious

Everyone knows conservatives can’t evolve.

Which is why we had the dark ages
 
Evolution is an outdated, Victorian era theory. Today we have structural-systematic philosophy, which I believe proves the existence of God:


We should consider removing evolution from public education and replacing it with structural-systematic philosophy, which I believe provides a more contemporary, 21st century understanding of the existence of God.
you dont need to bring god into it to prove evolution a fraud,,

evo has zero proof life came from pond scum or one kind of animal magically changed to another,,
 
you dont need to bring god into it to prove evolution a fraud,,

evo has zero proof life came from pond scum or one kind of animal magically changed to another,,
Yeah, it’s not like we have carbon dating,an actual fossil record or ice core thing…
 
Hilarious

Everyone knows conservatives can’t evolve.

Which is why we had the dark ages
Regardless, evolution is a theory which originated in the 1800s. (Actually, it technically dates even further back, since evolutionary thought originated in the West in ancient Greece). So why do we need it anymore? We can just come up with a more modern theory.
 
Regardless, evolution is a theory which originated in the 1800s. (Actually, it technically dates even further back, since evolutionary thought originated in the West in ancient Greece). So why do we need it anymore? We can just come up with a more modern theory.
Which is? A return to the Bible dude seriously
 
Regardless, evolution is a theory which originated in the 1800s. (Actually, it technically dates even further back, since evolutionary thought originated in the West in ancient Greece). So why do we need it anymore? We can just come up with a more modern theory.
The fossil record of Lucy is real deny that
 
Because unlike the OP and other MAGA MAGGOTS, we believe in science and they believe in bullshit.
 
the heavenly creation is their sabbath - couch potatoes have turned into a day off from work to get drunk. the desert dwellers.
The "desert dwellers" perished in the wilderness of Sinai. Their children only went into the promised land.
 
As an atheist, I find evolution, which hasn't been classified as a "theory" but fact for years now, as far more realistic than a great big invisible thingy in the sky that sees all, knows all and can do all, but somehow gets still makes mistakes in creating things.
Religion is a hackneyed fall back on something that couldn't be answered at the time.
As science progressed, things which were attributed to deities, began getting chipped away, piece by piece. Don't know how something happened? God did it! The old fill in the blank scenario.
In evolution, you find gradual changes in remains over eons of time due to environmental and other changes.
As an atheist, you express profound ignorance. Darwinian Evolution has already been discarded by modern Biology. Obviously, you don't understand the difference between the appearance of new species and the adaptation of existing species. The fossil record is most notable for its lack of interspecies evidence. Ironically, your reliance on "eons of time" to explain your theory is the epitome of "filling in the blanks" rather than rigorous scientific inquiry into the creation of new species.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom