Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do Republicans AND Democrats trivialize the threat from Finance Capitalism?Senate to Hold Hearings on “Anti-Muslim Bigotry
![]()
Senate to Hold Hearings on “Anti-Muslim Bigotry”
On a day when Islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in Jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when Islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two Christians outside a church in Pakistan, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in “anti-Muslim bigotry.”
Durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-Muslim human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and terror analyst Walid Phares.
Not only was the timing of Durbin’s announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood ‘s chief operating arm in the U.S.
Ellison used the bully pulpit King gave him to paint a lurid picture of Muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can Durbin top that?
Senate to Hold Hearings on
See what happens when you try to speak for others? You end up looking more the fool than you already look.
Here's a concept - which is something Maggie has no chance of grasping, but I'm confident you can...
My opinion on WHY you defend and support radical Islam is that you share a common enemy with them - Americans.
That little phrase means I'm not "speaking for others."
Try again.
Your claims that she "defends and supports radical islam" is the core of your opinion and how you are trying to speak for others as you insert the core belief of your baseless opinion and attribute it to others. Furthermore, you have failed to show how she did either.
Then there is your claim that she is the enemy of Americans which you can't and haven't proven either and that claim is yet another example of you trying to speak for others.
Your entire argument is based on your attempts to "speak for others."



See what happens when you try to speak for others? You end up looking more the fool than you already look.
Here's a concept - which is something Maggie has no chance of grasping, but I'm confident you can...
My opinion on WHY you defend and support radical Islam is that you share a common enemy with them - Americans.
That little phrase means I'm not "speaking for others."
Try again.
Your claims that she "defends and supports radical islam" is the core of your opinion and how you are trying to speak for others as you insert the core belief of your baseless opinion and attribute it to others. Furthermore, you have failed to show how she did either.
Then there is your claim that she is the enemy of Americans which you can't and haven't proven either and that claim is yet another example of you trying to speak for others.
Your entire argument is based on your attempts to "speak for others."
[
Death from terrorism isn't even listed. Therefore you who keep crying to the heavens over Muslims are ******* idiots.
Death Statistics Tables
Not all Nazis killed Jews, btw. But Nazism was still evil and needed to be confronted and wiped out. Nobody did.
A little less than 1% in fact.
Doesn't change the fact that Hitler made damned clear his hatred and homicidal tendencies - JUST as Muhammad did.
Yeah it does.
Only to the crack you smoke.
Is it your belief that all of islam should be considered radical?
Islam is Islam.
No, you're just lying.
Since that is the case, any comparison between christianity and islam would be equivalent to a comparison between christianity
I've made no such comparison. Such a comparison is absurdly stupid.
Beyond that, I recognize that one religious group has flown jetliners into US buildings. One religion has opened fire at US Airports in the name of their god. One religion has opened fire at US Army bases, killing and maiming dozens. One religion has recruited those to throw grenades into the tents of their commanding officers. One religion has loosed snipers in Washington DC to murder random people. One religion has put bombs in their shoes and underwear, one religion put bombs in cars to attack Manhattan.
And the religion SURE THE **** ain't Christianity, it's the religion you embrace and promote - Islam.
Christianity is based on the persona of Jesus created by Paul. A pacifist religion which urges turning the other cheek and forgiving ones enemies.
Islam is based on the Warlord Muhammad. A warrior who raged across Arabia slaughtering anyone in his way, seeking wealth through plunder and power. Wantonly raping and killing.
Uh you do realize that u2008 who you thanked previously is doing just that don't you?? He and others are arguing that all of islam is radical and therefore any comparison made between islam and chrisitianity is comparing christianity to radical islam in their minds. So thanks for calling them delusional. LOL
You're a ******* idiot who couldn't frame a logical argument to save your life.
Even IF I said that all of Islam is radical - it was YOU rather than I who made the comparison to Christianity, stupid ****.
Wow is right. You couldn't even counter what was said.
Why would I want to?
Put it in lights and let the nation know "THIS IS THE LEFT."
Nothing I can ever say will match the power to expose what complete, disgusting scum the left is, the depth of the hatred you have for this nation and the people in it; than that post does.
I won't stand in your way.
You do realize that in the original tea party they got drunk and painted themselve to look like native Americans in an attempt to frame innocent people because they were not as brave as the rewrites of history portray them to be, don't you??
There is a reason why samual adams is a brewery.
Wow, just wow.....
Wow is right. You couldn't even counter what was said. Imagine that. I admit that drunk part was my addition under the belief that one would have to be drunk in order to paint temselves and dress up to frame innocent native Americans and still believe that they are being brave. However, the fact is that they did dress up as native American and tried to frame innocent for their deeds. How is that honorable or brave??
File:Boston Tea Party Currier colored.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Check out the famous picture and tell me who is throwing the tea into the harbor. LOL
Or how about this one
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/east-india-company-influence-3.jpg
Pretty much every depiction of the event shows at least some dressed as native Americans So what is your spin??
Why do Republicans AND Democrats trivialize the threat from Finance Capitalism?Senate to Hold Hearings on Anti-Muslim Bigotry
![]()
Senate to Hold Hearings on Anti-Muslim Bigotry
On a day when Islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in Jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when Islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two Christians outside a church in Pakistan, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in anti-Muslim bigotry.
Durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-Muslim human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and terror analyst Walid Phares.
Not only was the timing of Durbins announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood s chief operating arm in the U.S.
Ellison used the bully pulpit King gave him to paint a lurid picture of Muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can Durbin top that?
Senate to Hold Hearings on
"Adequate food, clean water and basic security are already beyond the reach of perhaps half the worlds population. Food prices have risen 61 percent globally since December 2008, according to the International Monetary Fund.
"The price of wheat has exploded, more than doubling in the last eight months to $8.56 a bushel. When half of your income is spent on food, as it is in countries such as Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia and the Ivory Coast, price increases of this magnitude bring with them malnutrition and starvation.
"Food prices in the United States have risen over the past three months at an annualized rate of 5 percent.
"There are some 40 million poor in the United States who devote 35 percent of their after-tax incomes to pay for food.
"As the cost of fossil fuel climbs, as climate change continues to disrupt agricultural production and as populations and unemployment swell, we will find ourselves convulsed in more global and domestic unrest. Food riots and political protests will be inevitable. But it will not necessarily mean more democracy. "
Chris Hedges: The Collapse of Globalization - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
Not all Nazis killed Jews, btw. But Nazism was still evil and needed to be confronted and wiped out. Nobody did.
A little less than 1% in fact.
Doesn't change the fact that Hitler made damned clear his hatred and homicidal tendencies - JUST as Muhammad did.
WOW! What is truly sad is that apparently you actually beleive that if you say it, it then becomes fact even though to have failed to provide anything of substance to back your claims.
How typical. LOL
WOW, so YOU used that article as YOUR source to support YOUR argument and now are trying to disavow any connection to what was the foundation of your own argument. LOL
You use too many drugs.
McVeigh was a self-proclaimed agnostic.
The attempt by you limp-dicked, mental retards to paint him as a Christian, failed.
YOU posted the claim that he as an atheist and only AFTER you got called out for it and someone else pointed out that a story called him agnositc did your argument change.
Are you drunk or just a ******* idiot?
I posted the article naming McVeigh an atheist after some stupid ******* bigot - I think it was you, claimed he was a Christian.
You've whined ever since, despite two more citations confirming that McVeigh was an agnostic/atheist.
Dude, you should be embarrassed - I mean *I* am embarrassed for you...
WOW, so YOU used that article as YOUR source to support YOUR argument and now are trying to disavow any connection to what was the foundation of your own argument. LOL
Way to stick to your guns coward. LOL
YOU posted the claim that he as an atheist and only AFTER you got called out for it and someone else pointed out that a story called him agnositc did your argument change.
{Timothy McVeigh, was a self-proclaimed atheist, whose mantra was "Science is my religion."}
American Thinker Blog: If Timothy McVeigh had been a Christian
Bodecea knows this, he's just lying for his party.
Such is the way of progressives.
Your post and your argument. Editing my posts because they expose your dishonesty will not make the facts change or go away. LOL You accused someone else of lying even as you lied.
BTW your quote comes from your blog not time magazine.
"In fact, Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh, was a self-proclaimed atheist"
American Thinker Blog: If Timothy McVeigh had been a Christian
that came from your blog and I see no citation leading to time magazine. Imagine that, more lies from you. LOL
Furthermore, disagreeing with you and pointing out your dishonesty does in no way, shape, or form support the terrorists. That fact that you have to try to go that way out of sheer desperation and label those who dare to disagree with your BS shows that you know that you have nothing REAL to offer to the debate.
BTW I am still waiting on YOU to back up YOUR claim that YOUR link got it's info calling him an atheist which YOU used to make YOUR claims was from time magazine.
YOUR claim put up or shut up. LOL
You mean you promote radical islam?? Since the only lies that you are exposing are your own as you make up works of fiction and falsely attribute them to others it would appear that you are talking about yourself. LOL
You have to forgive Uncensored. He's got this twisted Idea that anyone who doesn't hate Islam and Muslims just because it is Islam and they are Muslims, it's because they are "promoting radical Islam".
You have to forgive Bod. She's got this twisted idea that it's "bigoted" to speak out against barbarism, corruption, human rights violations, and oppression.
Still using the term "witch hunt" with no proof that is happening. Please back up your statement or stop using it. It is misleading and deceptive. There are hearings on EVERYTHING in congress. It does not mean, much. As far as humiliating entire groups of people, don't you do that when someone disagrees with the lefties? Don't you call them names and try to insult them, personally, while never discussing the issue? A lawyer, I should have expected as much.
witch-hunt also witch hunt (wchhnt)
n.
An investigation carried out ostensibly to uncover subversive activities but actually used to harass and undermine those with differing views.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000
Are you really making the statement that "no" muslims are involved in "subversive activities"???????
Can you give evidence where "muslims" are harassed and undermined in this country?
Wow you actually believe that?? you really are a sicko aren't you??
Feral baboons lack the capacity to grasp sarcasm.
Who is overreacting? We are trying to have a "truthful" discussion.
You don't want the truth. And you ARE overreacting. All of you who see evil Muslims behind every tree and a Commie behind every statue in Washington. There will always be people who thrive on fear, and when there is none, they'll stir up some trouble. Anything to remain miserable, which in their contorted minds is equal to happiness.
YOUR OPINION IS NOT TRUTH! just in case you didn't know.
If Nazi Germany were to rise up today, the same people who defend the right of Islam to butcher and terrorize would be right there defending them as well.
Because people who embrace an idealogy that devalues human life will always support other idealogies that do the same.