Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[P@triot]

And no the person doesn't agree to the wage, they accept the wage if they want a job.

If they accepted the job - that means they agreed to the wage, stupid. Otherwise, they would have turned the job down.

 

[IM2]

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

See what I mean?!? Yes folks...the left really is that stupid.

Like a conservative knows anything.

 

[P@triot]

I have run a business

No you haven't. I can tell by your astoundingly ignorant posts that you are still in high school (and no - your lemonade stand does not count as "running a business").

 

[P@triot]

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

See what I mean?!? Yes folks...the left really is that stupid.

Like a conservative knows anything.

Wow...what an "intelligent" response there, IM2.

(Clearly the response of someone in high school)

 

[IM2]

You republicans understand the economy so well that you caused it to crash

It was the Dumbocrats who crashed the economy, you uninformed buffoon. I've got $100 right here and now that says you've never heard of the 1997 Community Re-Investment Act.

Thanks for playing, junior.

Given the Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977.........

I'll take that $100.

 

[P@triot]

In post #4029, I said:

Businesses do not eat cost. Like all left-wing nitwits, you think they will be stuck with the bill when you increase minimum wage. But that's not how it works.

Dimwit here proved me right not once, but twice:
In post #4032

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

And again in post #4035

I have run a business, I know that I can pay my employees more and take less of the profit home

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

While I do laugh my ass off at such stupidity, it is tragic in that they keep making detrimental policy based on that absurd and idiotic belief.

 

[P@triot]

You republicans understand the economy so well that you caused it to crash

It was the Dumbocrats who crashed the economy, you uninformed buffoon. I've got $100 right here and now that says you've never heard of the 1997 Community Re-Investment Act.

Thanks for playing, junior.

Given the Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977.........

I'll take that $100.

Nice Google job, dumb ass. Except we are not talking about Jimmy Carter's "Community Re-Investment Act". We're talking about Bill Clinton's. Ask an adult to help you Google that again.

 

[IM2]

I have run a business

No you haven't. I can tell by your astoundingly ignorant posts that you are still in high school (and no - your lemonade stand does not count as "running a business").

I have to laugh at you. You have no clue, repeat conservative talking points, plus you are getting your ass handed to you. So you turn to the next conservative tactic.

 

[P@triot]

You have no clue, repeat conservative talking points, plus you are getting your ass handed to you.

"Getting my ass handed to" me?!? Snowflake, I've obliterated you with facts backed up with links. You've had nothing but bizarre, immature, and incoherent posts. You're in high school and everyone knows it yet you're lying and saying you "ran a business" because you're getting crushed so thoroughly by facts.

 

[P@triot]

Hey IM2 - remember in post #4029 when I said that businesses will cut labor altogether and automate as one of the three options they will leverage in response to labor cost increases from government regulations? Gee...look what happened in California where the minimum wage was raised to $15 an hour. Oops...

Burger Flipping Robot Replaces Workers At Fast Food Restaurant - Breitbart

 

[P@triot]

You have no clue, repeat conservative talking points

It's not a "conservative talking point", snowflake. It's called reality.

 

[P@triot]

IM2 - appropriate screen name. You post like you are 2. You understand economics like you are 2.

 

[IM2]

In post #4029, I said:

Businesses do not eat cost. Like all left-wing nitwits, you think they will be stuck with the bill when you increase minimum wage. But that's not how it works.

Dimwit here proved me right not once, but twice:
In post #4032

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

And again in post #4035

I have run a business, I know that I can pay my employees more and take less of the profit home

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

While I do laugh my ass off at such stupidity, it is tragic in that they keep making detrimental policy based on that absurd and idiotic belief.

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits. Ypu do understand what PROFITS are don't you?

 

[P@triot]

In post #4029, I said:

Businesses do not eat cost. Like all left-wing nitwits, you think they will be stuck with the bill when you increase minimum wage. But that's not how it works.

Dimwit here proved me right not once, but twice:
In post #4032

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

And again in post #4035

I have run a business, I know that I can pay my employees more and take less of the profit home

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

While I do laugh my ass off at such stupidity, it is tragic in that they keep making detrimental policy based on that absurd and idiotic belief.

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits.

And if the business owner takes home less of the profits, that means they ate the labor costs.

How stupid are you exactly? I feel like I'm talking to a 7th grader right now.

 

[P@triot]

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits.

Folks...you can't make this stuff up.

 

[IM2]

You have no clue, repeat conservative talking points

It's not a "conservative talking point", snowflake. It's called reality.

No it's a talking point. I am talking about taking home less profit which means the company is making money after labor costs and all other casts..

 

[IM2]

In post #4029, I said:

Businesses do not eat cost. Like all left-wing nitwits, you think they will be stuck with the bill when you increase minimum wage. But that's not how it works.

Dimwit here proved me right not once, but twice:
In post #4032

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

And again in post #4035

I have run a business, I know that I can pay my employees more and take less of the profit home

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

While I do laugh my ass off at such stupidity, it is tragic in that they keep making detrimental policy based on that absurd and idiotic belief.

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits.

And if the business owner takes home less of the profits, that means they ate the labor costs.

How stupid are you exactly? I feel like I'm talking to a 7th grader right now.

No it means they made money after all the costs incurred idiot.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits. Ypu do understand what PROFITS are don't you?

I guarantee you have absolutely no idea what profits are. You probably think it is money left over after paying labor/materials and bills.

 

[P@triot]

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits.

If I'm the CEO of a corporation - I can't accept less profit because that will cause the price of my stocks to decrease, which will cause my shareholders and board of directors to fire me.

I ask again - how dumb are you IM2?

 

[P@triot]

In post #4029, I said:

Businesses do not eat cost. Like all left-wing nitwits, you think they will be stuck with the bill when you increase minimum wage. But that's not how it works.

Dimwit here proved me right not once, but twice:
In post #4032

The business owner can decide to take home less of the profits also.

And again in post #4035

I have run a business, I know that I can pay my employees more and take less of the profit home

The left actually believes that a business will eat labor costs.

While I do laugh my ass off at such stupidity, it is tragic in that they keep making detrimental policy based on that absurd and idiotic belief.

No it means the business owner will take home less of the profits.

And if the business owner takes home less of the profits, that means they ate the labor costs.

How stupid are you exactly? I feel like I'm talking to a 7th grader right now.

No it means they made money after all the costs incurred idiot.

Yeah...and it means they made less money because they ate the labor costs. Something they are not going to do. Ever.

You are just too young to be discussing this stuff, son. Go play some video games or something and come back in about 10 years. Ok?