Why do big cities vote Democrat?

It is always more profitable. Every time
You are of course talking out of your ass gain. We have machines that could eliminate millions of jobs but for various reasons they are not yet capable of doing it profitably.
 
You are of course talking out of your ass gain. We have machines that could eliminate millions of jobs but for various reasons they are not yet capable of doing it profitably.
Then the tech is not available



A machine is always more profitable than a person
 
A lower wage worker is screwed either way. Can't live on $15 per hour and will be replaced. Good ole america.
This argument really gets old, less than 2% of Americans are working for minimum wage.
 
7 million people
Out of a population of over 330,000,000 people. Minimum wage jobs are "entry level" jobs, not "career jobs.

How many people earn the federal minimum wage?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 1.6 million workers, or 1.9% of all hourly paid, non-self-employed workers, earned wages at or below the federal minimum wage in 2019. That year, 82.3 million people were paid hourly rates, making up 58.1% of all wage and salary workers in the United States.

 
I'm in favor if one is working full time for less than 40 grand they get assistance.
 
7 million people according to you
And this means or should mean what to me? Whatever that number is it's under 2% of the work force and those are "entry level" jobs mostly for those with no experience not career jobs.
 
Those are states dumbass, try looking at district and county maps.



You really aren't very bright.

Exactly, this is what they don't seem to understand. It is blue areas in red states that are poor. Same goes across the nation really, with a few exceptions.
 
I'm in favor if one is working full time for less than 40 grand they get assistance.
Only subsidize poverty if you want more of it.

There's no "right" to any minimum level of income in this country.

This is why it is dangerous to have more takers than producers. When we reach a point that there's a high enough number of those with a negative tax liability over 50% they will vote to kill and eat the golden goose.
 
Only subsidize poverty if you want more of it.

There's no "right" to any minimum level of income in this country.

This is why it is dangerous to have more takers than producers. When we reach a point that there's a high enough number of those with a negative tax liability over 50% they will vote to kill and eat the golden goose.
Then some children would starve to death
 
Back
Top Bottom