What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why didn’t the Trump lawyer team’s court filing today include the claim that Trump declassified the documents?

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
72,330
Reaction score
18,660
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania
Where is the Evidence…..are you shitting us ? You claim all this shit happened and you kept it to yourself. You did the same thing keep Hillary out of jail. Wh6 are you keeping th3 evidence to yourself foolish ?

And now a Democrat wanting "evidence." Damn, dude, this would be great if it became a standard for you. Don't worry, we both know it's not ...
 

Dagosa

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
7,769
Reaction score
2,004
Points
198
LOL, a Democrat looking for "proof." You guys always just make it up. Damn, there's a first time for everything
Made up shit…..that’s your response.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
72,330
Reaction score
18,660
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania
The election wasn't stolen. And, every court case the idiots who think the election was stolen have brought, has been thrown out.

Sorry, but if it had been stolen, there would be some kind of credible evidence by now.

Sure, guy. Pull my finger ...
 

Dagosa

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
7,769
Reaction score
2,004
Points
198
And now a Democrat wanting "evidence." Damn, dude, this would be great if it became a standard for you. Don't worry, we both know it's not ...
So….you have no evidence.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
72,330
Reaction score
18,660
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania

Dagosa

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
7,769
Reaction score
2,004
Points
198
i wasn’t the one that got mad because he couldn’t properly communicate…you were
Continue….you just made a post that would drain the correction pen of a grammar teacher.
 

ABikerSailor

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
53,184
Reaction score
12,349
Points
2,190
Location
Newberry, SC
Sure, guy. Pull my finger ...

Well, every court case that has been brought forth so far which alleges that the election was stolen has been thrown out for lack of evidence. If you have some kind of proof that the election actually was stolen, other than what you have heard from people who just have feelings but no proof, you'd become famous overnight. So..............where is your proof that the election was stolen?
 

MagicMike

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Messages
1,818
Reaction score
1,101
Points
928
Location
New Mexico
You said it, "HAD."

Zzz. You dimwit lbs aren’t very well informed.

Lawyers generally don’t mention matters outside the scope of the matter at issue in these preliminary matters. There is no legal purpose served in mentioning, in these particular responsive papers, that the President had already declassified the purportedly “classified” papers.

And yet, the former President did address it today:


What we are seeing here is pretty much the same garbage that was going on in the months after Trump lost the 2020 election.
Trump and his lunatic lawyers like Powell and Guilianni were out there mouthing off non stop in the press about "proof" of election fraud but then whenever they'd appear before the federal judges hearing the cases, they'd suddenly go mum....knowing that there are serious consequences for telling the same lies to judges that they can tell with impunity to the press.

So they were basically laughed out of court....over and over.
Over 50 times in fact.
They wound up facing disciplinary action from their state's barr associations for wasting the court's time with frivolous bullshit.

Same thing here.
They can mouth off all over the place in the media to try to shape public opinion on the issue but when push comes to shove NOBODY is going to put their necks on the line to SWEAR in court to what is really only false propaganda bullshit.

And they do it all the time!
Look at their fake-assed running rhetoric about "the other side not getting to tell THEIR side of the story" in the January 6th Committee Hearings.
NOT TRUE!
"Their side" just wants to tell things in the media.....not UNDER OATH where lying carries consequences.

"On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Similarly, on Dec. 12, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a long-shot lawsuit by the state of Texas and backed by Trump, which sought to throw out voting results in four states ( here ). In a brief order, the justices said Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case. "

 

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
109,284
Reaction score
26,209
Points
2,180
quiet-i-m-declassifying-documents.jpg
 

ABikerSailor

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
53,184
Reaction score
12,349
Points
2,190
Location
Newberry, SC

I wonder if Trump saw the movie "The Men Who Stare at Goats" and thought it was a documentary, so he tried to use this as a method of declassification?
 

Hutch Starskey

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
29,258
Reaction score
6,001
Points
290
Duh.....the whole purpose was determining what papers or documents were privileged.
Alleged classified files would not be a privilege concern.

Please try and keep up here..... :biggrin:
There are literally 10,000 documents that were seized, dope.
 

Hutch Starskey

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
29,258
Reaction score
6,001
Points
290
The SM is suppose to simply determine what is Trump's property, and what belongs to the NA via the Presidential Records Act.
Derp…No shit.
It will only serve to show that Trump had no legal reason at all to have those docs.
 

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
28,975
Reaction score
17,304
Points
1,288
Derp…No shit.
It will only serve to show that Trump had no legal reason at all to have those docs.
maybe. not..so? clinton had no legal reason, and knowingly keep them on an illegal server
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
102,612
Reaction score
26,655
Points
2,210
maybe. not..so? clinton had no legal reason, and knowingly keep them on an illegal server

Post the law that made her server illegal...
 

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
28,975
Reaction score
17,304
Points
1,288
Post the law that made her server illegal...
Did you not read the IG report on it?


The IG report cited department policies dating to 2005 that require “normal day-to-day operations” to be conducted on government servers, contrary to Clinton’s claim that her server was allowed. It also said she “had an obligation” to discuss her email system with cybersecurity officials, but there’s “no evidence” that she sought or received their approval.
The IG report said Clinton should have turned over her emails before she left office — not 21 months after she left. “he did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act,” the report said.
Clinton has said her emails “were captured and preserved immediately on the system at the State Department” because she emailed department officials at their government accounts. The IG report said that is “not an appropriate method of preserving any such emails that would constitute a Federal record.”

As we have written before, Clinton has said her email arrangement was “allowed” by her department and “fully above board.” Even after the report came out, Clinton continued to make this claim, saying in an ABC News interview on May 26 that “it was allowed.”

The IG report says that that was not the case.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

New Topics

Forum List

Top