What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why Did They Change The Definition Of "Vaccination"?

Rawley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
22,157
Reaction score
8,463
Points
2,295
Really?
I believe they changed it due to the ineffective nature of many of the vaccination that the totalitarians wish to make mandatory.
That seems true too. But the big change was in 2015 to take into account the mnRNA vaccines, which don't use a dead or weakened virus and were thus outside the old definition.
 

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
2,989
Reaction score
3,257
Points
1,938
That seems true too. But the big change was in 2015 to take into account the mnRNA vaccines, which don't use a dead or weakened virus and were thus outside the old definition.
They updated the definitions on 9/1/2021, 10 days ago, as previously posted in this thread and here:

 

Rawley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
22,157
Reaction score
8,463
Points
2,295
They updated the definitions on 9/1/2021, 10 days ago, as previously posted in this thread and here:

Yeah. They are weaseling around.

I can't see any of the boob's mandates being enforceable as the are grounded in politics, not science or public health.
 

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
11,603
Reaction score
1,564
Points
140
There is the succinct definition Democrat governance....'They don't care what you do as long as it is banned or mandated.'

Seems that they will mandate you being vaccinated......whether it is effective or not.

Now, before you claim one way or another.....check on what the definition of being vaccinated is, as it plays into the argument for encouraging same.

Wait....you're not sticking to the old fashioned definition....vaccinations to give immunity????





No longer.....

"CDC says it changed definition of vaccine – to be 'more transparent!'​

The Centers for Disease Control has reacted to a congressman's tweet pointing out amid the COVID-19 vaccines' waning effectiveness that the CDC's definitions of the words "vaccine" and "vaccination" have changed.



Prior to the launch of the COVID-19 vaccines, the definition of "vaccination" was "the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease." And before 2015, it was the "injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease."

The new definition replaces "immunity" with "protection," noted Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on Wednesday.








The CDC has acknowledged that the vaccines do not prevent the spread of the delta variant, which comprises nearly 100% of the current cases. The declining effectiveness of the vaccines is the premise for requiring vaccinated people to be masked and the push for booster shots. Instead, the agency now emphasizes that people who are vaccinated reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. However, in Israel, one of the world's most fully vaccinated nations, most of the COVID cases are among the vaccinated. In the U.K. last month, 40% of cases had received at least one shot."



Soooo......the vaccines may not work???



Well.....then let's mandate 'em!!!!!!!!!


Did you vote Democrat?????
The Nazi Dem Pathology is hiding behind this new definition The CDC was told to invoke. It’s the “killed or weakened infectious organism” part that’s problematic. Before the Chinese communists knew that SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative would be able to target elderly and obese Americans, POSPOTUS JoeXi and the Arab son, Obama, had already funded Duke-NUS Singapore. At that location, adenovirus technology links to the vaccination of the Russian military, which technology deals with “organisms” in the traditional sense of the definition, not Fau Chi’s mRNA technology.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
111,912
Reaction score
46,500
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The Nazi Dem Pathology is hiding behind this new definition The CDC was told to invoke. It’s the “killed or weakened infectious organism” part that’s problematic. Before the Chinese communists knew that SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative would be able to target elderly and obese Americans, POSPOTUS JoeXi and the Arab son, Obama, had already funded Duke-NUS Singapore. At that location, adenovirus technology links to the vaccination of the Russian military, which technology deals with “organisms” in the traditional sense of the definition, not Fau Chi’s mRNA technology.


"Nazi Dem"

I like that.

1631455583934.png





Astounding how effortlessly they got fools to vote for this.
 

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
11,603
Reaction score
1,564
Points
140
On the Nipah thread yesterday, we reported the scrubbing of a Fact Check webpage linking Daszak and Eco Health Alliance funding, showing that it was Daszak that attended the Nipah virus conference in Singapore. Nazi book burners may be squirming in their seats, because the serious link to Russian adenovirus vaccines for Singapore link to just as serious adenovirus outbreaks in Singapore.
 

beagle9

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
29,282
Reaction score
7,220
Points
280
"Nazi Dem"

I like that.

View attachment 538211




Astounding how effortlessly they got fools to vote for this.
Well, uhhh they didn't get the numbers needed, but that has been squashed like a third world country when it comes to having a proper investigation of such a thing, in which should be kept highly transparent here.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$142.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top