Why are libs so Violent

The evidence justifies, that’s all that really matters.
Evidence isn’t the problem. It’s your bias that’s the problem. It keeps you from honoring the evidence.

The extreme constituency of each party are mirror images. No real difference other than diametric dogma. They comprise about 30% of each party. It’s probably because they are the most vocal, staunch advocates, that your views of the entire are skewed or biased.
 
Evidence isn’t the problem. It’s your bias that’s the problem. It keeps you from honoring the evidence.
I've offered you evidence, you've offered nothing.

The extreme constituency of each party are mirror images. No real difference other than diametric dogma. They comprise about 30% of each party. It’s probably because they are the most vocal, staunch advocates, that your views of the entire are skewed or biased.
In 2022, the Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution describing the Jan 6th events as "legitimate political discourse." Is the RNC extreme? Seems to me they are mainstream of the GOP. Your bias keeps you from accepting the evidence.
 
I've offered you evidence, you've offered nothing.


In 2022, the Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution describing the Jan 6th events as "legitimate political discourse." Is the RNC extreme? Seems to me they are mainstream of the GOP. Your bias keeps you from accepting the evidence.
Well your not the base or a faction so who cares what you think leftist?
 
Gabe Lackmann said:
Marxism.

Karl Marx (Jew) ..
Karl Marx was anti Judaism. And you know that.
Marx and his surviving siblings were baptised into the Lutheran Church on 28 August 1824, and their mother in November 1825.
 
I've offered you evidence, you've offered nothing.
There is no evidence which justifies your broad brushed strokes.
In 2022, the Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution describing the Jan 6th events as "legitimate political discourse." Is the RNC extreme? Seems to me they are mainstream of the GOP. Your bias keeps you from accepting the evidence.
How does a committee represent the views of an entire political party? Again... it's not the evidence, it's your use of the evidence.

The evidence shows the Democratic Party Platform calls for paying for abortions when a woman cannot afford it. Can I argue all Democrats agree with that? If I did would the problem be with the evidence or my use of the evidence?

So while the evidence shows Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution describing the Jan 6th events as "legitimate political discourse," the evidence also shows that there were Republicans on the Select Committee that disagreed.
 
There is no evidence which justifies your broad brushed strokes.

How does a committee represent the views of an entire political party? Again... it's not the evidence, it's your use of the evidence.
I think that the committee that heads up the party represents the views of the majority of that political party. Again... it's not the evidence, it's your kneejerk dismissal of the evidence.

The evidence shows the Democratic Party Platform calls for paying for abortions when a woman cannot afford it. Can I argue all Democrats agree with that? If I did would the problem be with the evidence or my use of the evidence?
All Dems, no, a majority of Dems, probably.

So while the evidence shows Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution describing the Jan 6th events as "legitimate political discourse," the evidence also shows that there were Republicans on the Select Committee that disagreed.
So I guess we can agree that a minority of the GOP oppose the political violence of Jan 6.
 
I think that the committee that heads up the party represents the views of the majority of that political party. Again... it's not the evidence, it's your kneejerk dismissal of the evidence.
Actually it's your broad brushed strokes that are the problem. Which is why you have to parse what I wrote.
All Dems, no, a majority of Dems, probably.
Probably? If only you had used the same caveat in your broad brushed strokes.
So I guess we can agree that a minority of the GOP oppose the political violence of Jan 6.
I have no idea. Like I said before, there's about 30% in each party that are "true believers" and only care what their social media links tell them to believe.
 
It's not Democrats who fear death threats from their own constituents OP....






It's Republicans.
 
Two suspects in a far-left “anti-capitalist, anti-government” extremist group known as the “Turtle Island Liberation Front” were charged Tuesday with plotting to detonate weapons of mass destruction in and around Los Angeles on New Year’s Eve in a bombshell grand jury indictment. Terrorists plotted to detonate weapons of mass destruction across LA, feds say in bombshell new charges

Riots, bombings, police shootings, assassination talk.......perhaps we need a deep dive investigation of the Dem party
Our country divided by political HATE PROPAGANDA.
Blame blame blame, Never TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY
OR look at Your own party. Becoming a nation of followers.
Not thinkers.
 
Our country divided by political HATE PROPAGANDA.
Blame blame blame, Never TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY
OR look at Your own party. Becoming a nation of followers.
Not thinkers.
Gee is Timmy taking responsibility for the billion in fraud he enabled....you can shut up now
 
Would you like to ban and confiscate guns?
NO. no no. Yet when little school children are murdered, And we double our efforts to defend the NRA.
it was a Great org Before it became a greedy political tool.
 
NO. no no. Yet when little school children are murdered, And we double our efforts to defend the NRA.
it was a Great org Before it became a greedy political tool.
The NRA is a joke but I'm not sure what that has to do with gun violence and gun accidents.
 
15th post
Karl Marx was anti Judaism. And you know that.
Marx and his surviving siblings were baptised into the Lutheran Church on 28 August 1824, and their mother in November 1825.
That doesn’t change the fact he was a Jew.
 
NO. no no. Yet when little school children are murdered, And we double our efforts to defend the NRA.
it was a Great org Before it became a greedy political tool.
What laws have been passed that of strengthened the NRA please list them. I’d like to know.
 
I think that the committee that heads up the party represents the views of the majority of that political party. Again... it's not the evidence, it's your kneejerk dismissal of the evidence.


All Dems, no, a majority of Dems, probably.


So I guess we can agree that a minority of the GOP oppose the political violence of Jan 6.
No one cares about Muh Jan 6th save a bunch of dilts who view the state as a false god.
 
Back
Top Bottom