why are liberals so afraid of the 1st amendment?

[Siete]

Birmingham being a Muslim city. Beating people for not wearing Muslim attire. 175 no-go zones in Paris.

******* assholes.

These lies Fox News and the other partisan hacks tell about Muslims remind me of one time when I was stationed in Puerto Rico.

I went to a local festival and had a great time. The next day, one of the bigots on base was telling a roomful of people about the same festival. He said they had shouted over the microphone, "Yankees go home!" and that the crowd had joined in. And then he pulls out his big knife and says he had to pull it at the festival to fight for his life to get out of there.

It was all completely made up, and I took some joy in telling him that I had been there and he was full of shit.

He didn't say that, you ******* liar.

He referenced and attack in London that I have already documented.

You ******* leftists have no integrity at all.

post #157 ... London BS debunked by Fox themselves.

******* RW;s have no integrity.. NONE.

 

[EricJ]

Why do right-wingers love straw men?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why do right-wingers love straw men?

It's all they can manage to knock down.

 

[Syriusly]

Why do they talk so much about Fox news and talk radio?

What are they really afraid of?

If I don't like something I just change the channel.

What's so hard about it?

Just saying..


Timeline Photos

Which liberals would those be? Not me.

I think Fox News is pretty biased, but they have every right to be biased anyway they want to- I just don't watch them.

Just saying- you seem to be generalizing........why do Conservatives do that (intentionally ironic generalization)

 

[BlindBoo]

Classic projection. Faux News listeners and viewers can't stand the fact that Americans can and do voice opposition to the endless parade of lies and deceits they produce.

Dude, your fuckwad of a party actually tried to repeal the 1st last September.

Deep down in yer gut you feel that's true don't-cha?

The poster child of Truthiness.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Deep down in yer gut you feel that's true don't-cha?

Here' the thing BlindFool, I know you're a "party above all" kind of hack, but I already documented that your party did as verified fact, seek to revoke the 1st Amendment. Click the provided link.

The poster child of Truthiness.

If you had even a shred of integrity - you couldn't be a democrat.

{ Forty-one Democrats have signed on to co-sponsor New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall's proposed amendment to give Congress plenary power to regulate political speech. The text of the amendment says that Congress could regulate "the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal elections." The amendment places no limitations whatsoever on Congress's new power.}

Ted Cruz The Democratic Assault on the First Amendment - WSJ

 

[Uncensored2008]

post #157 ... London BS debunked by Fox themselves.

******* RW;s have no integrity.. NONE.

Look, you're stupid - it's why you're a leftist.

The perps were arrested and put in prison. buy a clue.

 

[BlindBoo]

[
Deep down in yer gut you feel that's true don't-cha?

Here' the thing BlindFool, I know you're a "party above all" kind of hack, but I already documented that your party did as verified fact, seek to revoke the 1st Amendment. Click the provided link.

The poster child of Truthiness.

If you had even a shred of integrity - you couldn't be a democrat.

{ Forty-one Democrats have signed on to co-sponsor New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall's proposed amendment to give Congress plenary power to regulate political speech. The text of the amendment says that Congress could regulate "the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal elections." The amendment places no limitations whatsoever on Congress's new power.}

Ted Cruz The Democratic Assault on the First Amendment - WSJ

See. You do don't cha!

Democrat were seeking to overturn the Citizens United decision by the Roberts Court and the Republican want it to stand.

But your media gods told you it was an assault on the 1st and you bought it hook line and sinker.

You're a parrot!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why do they talk so much about Fox news and talk radio?

What are they really afraid of?

If I don't like something I just change the channel.

What's so hard about it?

Just saying..


Timeline Photos

This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.

First Amendment jurisprudence applies solely to the relationship between the government and those governed, not between two private persons, or a group of private persons being critical of a private company such as Fox.

Consequently, liberals ridiculing Fox and its viewers – because both are in fact ridiculous – in no way 'violates' the First Amendment, nor does it demonstrate a 'fear' of the Amendment on the part of liberals, the notion is idiocy.

It's remarkable how most conservatives are ignorant of this fact and make the same mistake, not just the OP.

 

[elektra]

Liberal's are not afraid of the 1st Amendment, they simply do not agree with Free Speech.

Given a chance, the Democrat Socialist Liberals will be no different than any other Socialist Party, Like the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NAZI) or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

Today I can state this, tomorrow I will be jailed, when my children mention this in front of a Teacher working for the Democrat Socialist Liberals, that is when I will be arrested, convicted without a trial, and sent to the New Gulag of America.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why do they talk so much about Fox news and talk radio?

What are they really afraid of?

If I don't like something I just change the channel.

What's so hard about it?

Just saying..


Timeline Photos

The explanation is relatively so simple it is almost unnoticed: Liberals are people who demand their constitutional rights in order to deprive you of your constitional rights. No other definitions apply.

And yet another conservative exhibits his ignorance and stupidly.

Again, private citizens being critical of a private company does not constitute 'hostility' toward the First Amendment or free speech; only government can potentially violate the rights enshrined in the First Amendment by seeking prior restraint, preempting free speech, or subjecting those who engage in speech the government wishes to silence to punitive measures.

Liberals aren't petitioning Congress to pass a law making Fox 'illegal,' or enact a measure subjecting Fox viewers to 'arrest and imprisonment,' where absent such government actions no free expression is 'restricted.'

Indeed, to point out the errors, idiocy, and lies common to Fox 'news' in no way diminishes the First Amendment rights of conservative viewers of Fox.

 

[Uncensored2008]

See. You do don't cha!

Democrat were seeking to overturn the Citizens United decision by the Roberts Court and the Republican want it to stand.

So the democrat scum attempted to repeal the 1st Amendment.

Seriously, you CAN'T BRING YOURSELF TO BE HONEST, can you?

The scum sucking democrats tried to repeal the 1st - absolute and irrefutable fact. There motive is they don't like little people having political speech? Who cares, they tried to repeal the 1st Amendment - that makes them scum.

But your media gods told you it was an assault on the 1st and you bought it hook line and sinker.

You're a parrot!

You're a hack, party above all.

You of the left are at war to end civil rights, and you know it.

 

[Hossfly]

Why do they talk so much about Fox news and talk radio?

What are they really afraid of?

If I don't like something I just change the channel.

What's so hard about it?

Just saying..


Timeline Photos

The explanation is relatively so simple it is almost unnoticed: Liberals are people who demand their constitutional rights in order to deprive you of your constitional rights. No other definitions apply.

And yet another conservative exhibits his ignorance and stupidly.

Again, private citizens being critical of a private company does not constitute 'hostility' toward the First Amendment or free speech; only government can potentially violate the rights enshrined in the First Amendment by seeking prior restraint, preempting free speech, or subjecting those who engage in speech the government wishes to silence to punitive measures.

Liberals aren't petitioning Congress to pass a law making Fox 'illegal,' or enact a measure subjecting Fox viewers to 'arrest and imprisonment,' where absent such government actions no free expression is 'restricted.'

Indeed, to point out the errors, idiocy, and lies common to Fox 'news' in no way diminishes the First Amendment rights of conservative viewers of Fox.

It's not the private citizens I'm talking about, it's about the Leftbrain idiots in Congress.