Why are Democrat-run Cities Such Cesspits and Environmental Violence?

[DigitalDrifter]

Of course the liberals precious illegals cannot be expected to properly dispose of their filth.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Sections of Los Angeles Blighted with Most Illegal Dumping, Litter, and Decay.

Victor Davis Hanson frequently sees the strange dichotomy of California up close and personal on his family’s farm and neighboring hometown of Fresno. As he has noted on several occasions, the state’s leftwing elites in Sacramento are utterly obsessed with passing more and more environmental laws, which impact primarily its middle-class citizens (ban the shopping bag!) and its business owners (try building anything in California without obtaining a stack of permits first). Which makes for a sharp contrast with their see-no-evil attitude towards illegal immigrants and their crimes.

As he wrote in 2013, along with a photo he took of refuse dumped alongside his family’s vineyard, “The miscreants had already dumped their trash: chemical drums, paints, solvents, oils, concrete, tires, garbage, and lots of broken fluorescent glass tubes — something a bit worse than the usual toxic brew that is left on San Joaquin Valley property. How strange that the California legislature can pass all sorts of new laws over the last six months — transgendered access to either boy or girl restrooms in the public schools, the banning of lead bullets, driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — but it cannot go after the epidemic of destroying the ecology of the San Joaquin Valley countryside. If only there were a spotted toad or a lavender newt native to the vineyard, perhaps the Bay Area intelligentsia would change their views about unchecked illegal immigration. I think the rationale of the dumpers is that there are always enough law-abiding citizens left to pick up after the casual law-breaking of the fewer. But are the fewer still the fewer?”

Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Se…

Moderation Note: Edited Title from ALL CAPS. Please adhere to the rules..

 

[Pogo]

"Democrat-run cities"??

You mean as contrasted with ... what, other Democrat-run cities?

SMH "Democrat-run cities" is like saying "PIN number" or "pizza pie".

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The inhabitants?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Of course the liberals precious illegals cannot be expected to properly dispose of their filth.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Sections of Los Angeles Blighted with Most Illegal Dumping, Litter, and Decay.

Victor Davis Hanson frequently sees the strange dichotomy of California up close and personal on his family’s farm and neighboring hometown of Fresno. As he has noted on several occasions, the state’s leftwing elites in Sacramento are utterly obsessed with passing more and more environmental laws, which impact primarily its middle-class citizens (ban the shopping bag!) and its business owners (try building anything in California without obtaining a stack of permits first). Which makes for a sharp contrast with their see-no-evil attitude towards illegal immigrants and their crimes.

As he wrote in 2013, along with a photo he took of refuse dumped alongside his family’s vineyard, “The miscreants had already dumped their trash: chemical drums, paints, solvents, oils, concrete, tires, garbage, and lots of broken fluorescent glass tubes — something a bit worse than the usual toxic brew that is left on San Joaquin Valley property. How strange that the California legislature can pass all sorts of new laws over the last six months — transgendered access to either boy or girl restrooms in the public schools, the banning of lead bullets, driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — but it cannot go after the epidemic of destroying the ecology of the San Joaquin Valley countryside. If only there were a spotted toad or a lavender newt native to the vineyard, perhaps the Bay Area intelligentsia would change their views about unchecked illegal immigration. I think the rationale of the dumpers is that there are always enough law-abiding citizens left to pick up after the casual law-breaking of the fewer. But are the fewer still the fewer?”

Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Se…

lots of what the guy is saying is true.....but what about the democrat run cities out here that are pretty dam nice places to live?....and there are republican run cities that also have "cesspools" in them.....

 

[Luddly Neddite]

"Dem run cities".

Really?

OP - please post examples of cities where there are no Repubs.

Thanks ever so much.

 

[boedicca]

Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy.

The Democrat Part is far more adept at yoking and looting the serfs via the ever-growing public sector bureaucracy. The things they do to us via regulation are the same type of totalitarian abuses of earlier times, but the thin faux veneer of legality dupes the people they claim to be helping.

The GOP does this as well, but they are not nearly as unified nor advanced in Big Government.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

"Democrat-run cities"??

You mean as contrasted with ... what, other Democrat-run cities?

SMH "Democrat-run cities" is like saying "PIN number" or "pizza pie".

^^^^this when you have nothing, nonsense.

 

[Mr Natural]

You do realize that New York City, the single most imporant place in the world and Center of the Universe is a Democrat run city.

 

[Moonglow]

Live in a GOP state like Kansass and see how you like it...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE?"

Post hoc fallacy, loaded question fallacy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Instapundit”

lol

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Of course the liberals precious illegals cannot be expected to properly dispose of their filth.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Sections of Los Angeles Blighted with Most Illegal Dumping, Litter, and Decay.

Victor Davis Hanson frequently sees the strange dichotomy of California up close and personal on his family’s farm and neighboring hometown of Fresno. As he has noted on several occasions, the state’s leftwing elites in Sacramento are utterly obsessed with passing more and more environmental laws, which impact primarily its middle-class citizens (ban the shopping bag!) and its business owners (try building anything in California without obtaining a stack of permits first). Which makes for a sharp contrast with their see-no-evil attitude towards illegal immigrants and their crimes.

As he wrote in 2013, along with a photo he took of refuse dumped alongside his family’s vineyard, “The miscreants had already dumped their trash: chemical drums, paints, solvents, oils, concrete, tires, garbage, and lots of broken fluorescent glass tubes — something a bit worse than the usual toxic brew that is left on San Joaquin Valley property. How strange that the California legislature can pass all sorts of new laws over the last six months — transgendered access to either boy or girl restrooms in the public schools, the banning of lead bullets, driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — but it cannot go after the epidemic of destroying the ecology of the San Joaquin Valley countryside. If only there were a spotted toad or a lavender newt native to the vineyard, perhaps the Bay Area intelligentsia would change their views about unchecked illegal immigration. I think the rationale of the dumpers is that there are always enough law-abiding citizens left to pick up after the casual law-breaking of the fewer. But are the fewer still the fewer?”

Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Se…

lots of what the guy is saying is true.....but what about the democrat run cities out here that are pretty dam nice places to live?....and there are republican run cities that also have "cesspools" in them.....

The utopia's like Seattle and Frisco ?
Well, they may be nice but they're horrendously expensive to live in.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

"WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE?"

Post hoc fallacy, loaded question fallacy.

Bonus points for two falcalies.
Try for three ?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

You do realize that New York City, the single most imporant place in the world and Center of the Universe is a Democrat run city.

Another place to live, that unless you have some of the myriad of lib handout programs, that is extremely expensive to live in.

And by the way, NYC may be important as far as the worlds economy goes, it's not exactly a clean place to live filled with friendly non-violent people.

 

[guno]

If it wasn't for the blue demo cites your red state welfare would dry up

 

[Intolerant]

If it wasn't for the blue demo cites your red state welfare would dry up

Good that would take care of all the leeches.

 

[Political Junky]

If it wasn't for the blue demo cites your red state welfare would dry up

And Mississippi is gambling with losing $Billions in welfare payments so they can return to last century racism.

 

[chikenwing]

"WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE?"

Post hoc fallacy, loaded question fallacy.

Bonus points for two falcalies.
Try for three ?

Wonder if he speaks the word as he types.

 

[Syriusly]

Of course the liberals precious illegals cannot be expected to properly dispose of their filth.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Sections of Los Angeles Blighted with Most Illegal Dumping, Litter, and Decay.

Victor Davis Hanson frequently sees the strange dichotomy of California up close and personal on his family’s farm and neighboring hometown of Fresno. As he has noted on several occasions, the state’s leftwing elites in Sacramento are utterly obsessed with passing more and more environmental laws, which impact primarily its middle-class citizens (ban the shopping bag!) and its business owners (try building anything in California without obtaining a stack of permits first). Which makes for a sharp contrast with their see-no-evil attitude towards illegal immigrants and their crimes.

As he wrote in 2013, along with a photo he took of refuse dumped alongside his family’s vineyard, “The miscreants had already dumped their trash: chemical drums, paints, solvents, oils, concrete, tires, garbage, and lots of broken fluorescent glass tubes — something a bit worse than the usual toxic brew that is left on San Joaquin Valley property. How strange that the California legislature can pass all sorts of new laws over the last six months — transgendered access to either boy or girl restrooms in the public schools, the banning of lead bullets, driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — but it cannot go after the epidemic of destroying the ecology of the San Joaquin Valley countryside. If only there were a spotted toad or a lavender newt native to the vineyard, perhaps the Bay Area intelligentsia would change their views about unchecked illegal immigration. I think the rationale of the dumpers is that there are always enough law-abiding citizens left to pick up after the casual law-breaking of the fewer. But are the fewer still the fewer?”

Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Se…

Moderation Note: Edited Title from ALL CAPS. Please adhere to the rules..

What a weird quote- what cities?

The quote is about dumping in rural- and Conservative- San Joaquin Valley- a Republican stronghold.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Of course the liberals precious illegals cannot be expected to properly dispose of their filth.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Sections of Los Angeles Blighted with Most Illegal Dumping, Litter, and Decay.

Victor Davis Hanson frequently sees the strange dichotomy of California up close and personal on his family’s farm and neighboring hometown of Fresno. As he has noted on several occasions, the state’s leftwing elites in Sacramento are utterly obsessed with passing more and more environmental laws, which impact primarily its middle-class citizens (ban the shopping bag!) and its business owners (try building anything in California without obtaining a stack of permits first). Which makes for a sharp contrast with their see-no-evil attitude towards illegal immigrants and their crimes.

As he wrote in 2013, along with a photo he took of refuse dumped alongside his family’s vineyard, “The miscreants had already dumped their trash: chemical drums, paints, solvents, oils, concrete, tires, garbage, and lots of broken fluorescent glass tubes — something a bit worse than the usual toxic brew that is left on San Joaquin Valley property. How strange that the California legislature can pass all sorts of new laws over the last six months — transgendered access to either boy or girl restrooms in the public schools, the banning of lead bullets, driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — but it cannot go after the epidemic of destroying the ecology of the San Joaquin Valley countryside. If only there were a spotted toad or a lavender newt native to the vineyard, perhaps the Bay Area intelligentsia would change their views about unchecked illegal immigration. I think the rationale of the dumpers is that there are always enough law-abiding citizens left to pick up after the casual law-breaking of the fewer. But are the fewer still the fewer?”

Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH CESSPITS OF OFFICIAL POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE? Poorest Se…

lots of what the guy is saying is true.....but what about the democrat run cities out here that are pretty dam nice places to live?....and there are republican run cities that also have "cesspools" in them.....

The utopia's like Seattle and Frisco ?
Well, they may be nice but they're horrendously expensive to live in.

yes they are but that is not what the guy who wrote the story was implying.....he was trying to imply that democrat run cities in CA. are cesspools when that is only partially true,since many are pretty dam nice....he forgot to mention the ones run by republicans that are pretty shitty places to live.......