Who Will Be The First Republican AG To Indict Hillary Or Obama?

[busybee01]

That is an excellent point.....I mean, stealing an election would be a state crime.....the Georgia AG should get right on it...or the Texas AG can charge Biden...any day now

The Secretary of State in Georgia said the election was fair. End of case.
Texas Republicans say they saw no election crimes. End of case.

 

[busybee01]

Obama should be indicted for his use of drone strikes...he killed many many innocent people..some Americans.....that is a murder charge....

He is also involved in a large drug trafficking gang., run by Hunter Biden....they have sold drugs in many states like Alabama and Nebraska, etc....he can be charged for that....



Hillary is involved in child sex-trafficking as well as ordering the murder of at least 100 people in Arkansas...time to bring charges...

Killing terrorists is not a crime. That is a issue where Obama was right.

 

[busybee01]

As the great political philosopher Charlie Kirk said....figure it out

That is not the way our legal system works. That is how Nazi Germany worked.

 

[busybee01]

The trumped up charges are the ones being brought against Trump.

You lose. Trump tries to use corporate money as hush money and filed a false report with the state of NY. That much is certain.

 

[busybee01]

Well....I didn't know Mitch can stop the AG of Arkansas from indicting any Democrats

Why can't DeSantis instruct his AG to indict Hunter's laptop?

You can't take your country back without strength


If Libs are a bunch of soy boy cucks, why are Reps so weak to stop them?

That is exactly what Adolph Hitler would say.

The AG of Arkansas can only prosecute individuals who commit crimes in the state of Arkansas. NY has jurisdiction because Trump's corporation is domiciled in NY and he filed the false paperwork in NY.

 

[BackAgain]

You lose. Trump tries to use corporate money as hush money and filed a false report with the state of NY. That much is certain.

You’re dull.

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

You have no clue what the charges are yet. You don’t know what the actual evidence might be, yet.

 

[busybee01]

Why? Bragg didnt. He is a state attorney trying to get Trump on an election crime, which is a federal crime because it was a national election. That isnt his jurisdiction as a state attorney. That didnt stop him from indicting Trump. The ACTUAL Feds already passed on this case years ago because there was nothing there. Its an unwinnable case that looks terrible when youre targeting a fucking president. It smacks of political retribution.

Wrong. The Feds passed on this case because AG Bob Barr ordered them to close the investigation. Trump's corporation is domiciled in NY. Trump used corporate funds and filed a false report with the state of NY. That is a crime. To look the other way would send the message that politicians are above the law. That reek of politics.

 

[busybee01]

While I can appreciate this person's frustration with the latest attack on the rule of law and our Constitutional Republic by the Demafascist, I don't expect any Republican to indict Clinton, or Obama....the GOP Govs and AGs, and DAs respect the rule of law too much and will not abuse their office to prosecute or attack others for political purposes.

Republicans only respect the rule of law when they can use it against their political enemies. When Republicans are held accountable, Republicans attack the rule of law. The reason no Republican will issue any false indictments is that they could be jailed for abuse of power.

 

[August West]

I think that the red hats should take to the streets and scream Brandon! That`ll show `em.

 

[busybee01]

No, no administration has ever done this to the previous president. Every administration has held this tradition since our first president, until democrats in 2023. You set the precedent, so yeah, you can expect us to put all the Biden's in prison, or at the very least tie them up in courts for years. Dont go whining about it when it happens.

No one is going to be tied up in court. No federal court will uphold any phony indictments.

 

[busybee01]

Biden and Hillary should be a piece of cake to convict for anyone really trying. Obama would be harder because he was a little sneakier.

No conviction would be upheld in any federal court.

 

[busybee01]

The only person running for President in 2016 that broke campaign fin laws, was Clinton and the DNC....at least according to those that enforce Federal election law.

That is their opinion. That could be contested in court if a party desired. However most campaigns pay the fine and move on.

 

[busybee01]

Hucakabee Sanders is governor now

So what.

 

[busybee01]

Hillary, Obama, Biden, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Wray, Pelosi, Schiff, Swalwell, ....

Now that new partisan precedence is being set by Democrats, the list of criminal, treasonous Democrats who deserve to / should be indicted and prosecuted is damn-near endless.

The number of jailed Trumpies will grow.

 

[sealybobo]

Charlie Kirk had better watch that he doesn't get charged. There is a word for that. Accessory to kidnapping. Any AG that tries it will find themselves charged. The crime has to be committed in the state not in another state. Since Hillary Clinton has never been in Idaho, she cannot be charged for anything in Idaho.

In three polls released since word of the indictment broke on Thursday, pluralities or majorities of the public have approved of the grand jury’s decision to indict — 51% of voters in a Morning Consult poll, 45% of Americans in a ABC News/Ipsos poll and 60% of Americans in a CNN/SSRS poll. In all three, between 30% and 40% of respondents disapproved of the decision.

It was the right thing to do and Americans know it. Trump is a criminal. Let him run as one. Let Republicans own that.

 

[struth]

Republicans only respect the rule of law when they can use it against their political enemies. When Republicans are held accountable, Republicans attack the rule of law. The reason no Republican will issue any false indictments is that they could be jailed for abuse of power.

You are right about the last point...that's why they don't do it....clearly your demafasicst klan doesn't seem to care about that.

 

[busybee01]

This whole charade is just embarrassing. The fact that this kind of total bullshit can actually go this far is proof that our justice system is totally rigged. NYC and the Democrat party are making total assholes out of themselves, and it looks so natural.

The fact that Trumpies like you believe that the system is rigged if your guy is held accountable is proof of your craziness. You are the ones acting like assholes.

 

[struth]

That is their opinion. That could be contested in court if a party desired. However most campaigns pay the fine and move on.

well, yes it's the folks that actually ENFORCE the laws opinion, based on the evidence and law, and yes the DNC, Clinton and even Obama had to pay the price for violating the law.

In other news, they formed no such opinion based on the law, and the evidence on Trump.

 

[busybee01]

I can't wait fotlr that day. In the meantime Democrats wil continue to violate the Constitution and law attempting to MANUFACTURE crimes with which to accuse Trump.

Republicans are too busy violating the Constitution and allowing school shootings to take place.

 

[busybee01]

You’re dull.

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

You have no clue what the charges are yet. You don’t know what the actual evidence might be, yet.

Undoubtadly those incidents are part of the charges. Anything beyond that is unknown.