Who Was Ruth Bader-Ginsburg?

for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
Of course it is the GOP who are changing their tune about not confirming a supreme court justice in an election year. It seems to the GOP it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic


What does that have to do with whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
 
for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
Of course it is the GOP who are changing their tune about not confirming a supreme court justice in an election year. It seems to the GOP it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
What does that have to do with whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
Absolutely nothing so why did you include it in your post about whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
 
for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
Of course it is the GOP who are changing their tune about not confirming a supreme court justice in an election year. It seems to the GOP it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
What does that have to do with whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
Absolutely nothing so why did you include it in your post about whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?


You should try harder to focus on the subject.

Of course, if the source of your inability is a neurological disorder, it becomes undertandable.
 
for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
Of course it is the GOP who are changing their tune about not confirming a supreme court justice in an election year. It seems to the GOP it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
What does that have to do with whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
Absolutely nothing so why did you include it in your post about whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?


You should try harder to focus on the subject.

Of course, if the source of your inability is a neurological disorder, it becomes undertandable.
So you're advising me to ignore what you post? If one of us has a neurological disorder I'd think it would be the first one to post some out of focus as you did.
 
for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
Of course it is the GOP who are changing their tune about not confirming a supreme court justice in an election year. It seems to the GOP it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic
What does that have to do with whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?
Absolutely nothing so why did you include it in your post about whether or not Justice Ginsburg abandoned her religion?


You should try harder to focus on the subject.

Of course, if the source of your inability is a neurological disorder, it becomes understandable.
So you're advising me to ignore what you post? If one of us has a neurological disorder I'd think it would be the first one to post some out of focus as you did.

Just stick to what you learned at Abilene Agriculture and Mining.
 
1. When I reviewed how little Obama actually did for his racial brethren, it is not possible to come away with other than the conclusion that, for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic, and that, in this case, being black is nothing more than vote-accruing ploy.

So, one would be more accurate in saying that Obama is a Liberal, or a Democrat, rather than pointing to any importance being black is to him.




Which brings up a similar question in identifying the past Justice Ginsburg....Jewish....or Liberal/Democrat???

2. The following was of Ginsburg's obituary, as published in the Guardian.

Born in Brooklyn, New York, she was the younger daughter of Jewish parents, Celia (nee Amster) and Nathan Bader, a furrier, and grew up in the Flatbush neighbourhood. She was originally called Joan, but her mother preferred her middle name, Ruth, as there were so many Joans at her high school, James Madison. Ruth was brought up in a Conservative Jewish tradition and learned Hebrew as a child, but abandoned her religion because she was not allowed to join a minyan (a group of men) to mourn her mother’s death when she was 13.

Her husband played an important part in quiet lobbying for Clinton to nominate her for the supreme court. This was by no means a likely choice. Clinton was working with a list of more than 40 candidates, all men. Clinton was anxious to make the supreme court more diverse, so Ginsburg’s Jewish religion, which she had abandoned 46 years earlier, may have counted for more than a lifetime of commitment to women’s equality before the law. Still, once her name was in the ring, Clinton was enthusiastic.”
Ruth Bader Ginsburg obituary


3. WHAT????
Not really Jewish.....but the Democrats simply pretended same to provide the illusion of diversity?????


4. And even more interesting is the Guardian doctoring that obituary when truth became....uncomfortable.
Here is what you will find now, if you tried to research the quote:


"Born in Brooklyn, New York, she was the younger daughter of Jewish parents, Celia (nee Amster) and Nathan Bader, a furrier, and grew up in the Flatbush neighbourhood. She was originally called Joan, but her mother preferred her middle name, Ruth, as there were so many Joans at her high school, James Madison. Ruth was brought up in a Conservative Jewish tradition and learned Hebrew as a child, but moved away from strict religious observance after she was not allowed to join a minyan (a group of men) to mourn her mother’s death when she was 17. Indignant at that exclusion, she nevertheless remained deeply committed to her Jewish identity.

Her husband played an important part in quiet lobbying for Clinton to nominate her for the supreme court. This was by no means a likely choice. Clinton was working with a list of more than 40 candidates, all men. Clinton was anxious to make the supreme court more diverse, and both Ginsburg’s lifetime of commitment to women’s equality before the law and Jewish identity may have been significant factors. Once her name was in the ring, Clinton was enthusiastic."

5. When questioned, the Guardian was pressed to explain the 'alteration' as follows:
"This article was amended on 22 September 2020 to clarify that while Ruth Bader Ginsburg moved away from strict religious observance at 17, her Jewish identity remained important throughout her life. Furthermore, her Jewish identity may have been a factor in President Clinton’s appointment of her to a supreme court that lacked diversity, if not so much as her commitment to women’s equality. "

After all.....one cannot embarrass the Democrats, especially the Clintons.

I do not see that "Liberal/Democrat" is a bad thing. I see what is happening in this country connected with Republicans in power. The underprivileged and disenfranchised are not helped, and become worse off. Big business benefits, and the rich get richer. The rest suffer through the issues of the COVID outbreak, that could have been dealt with earlier and much better. And how many among the Republicans in power are caring for the destructiveness to this earth? Go ahead, name which ones. What's wrong with that? Revelation 11:18
 
Who Was Ruth Bader-Ginsburg?
An activist liberal SCOTUS justice that stayed on the bench years longer than necessary.
 
1. When I reviewed how little Obama actually did for his racial brethren, it is not possible to come away with other than the conclusion that, for the Left, the Militant Secularists, it is power and ideology that supplant every other characteristic, and that, in this case, being black is nothing more than vote-accruing ploy.

So, one would be more accurate in saying that Obama is a Liberal, or a Democrat, rather than pointing to any importance being black is to him.




Which brings up a similar question in identifying the past Justice Ginsburg....Jewish....or Liberal/Democrat???

2. The following was of Ginsburg's obituary, as published in the Guardian.

Born in Brooklyn, New York, she was the younger daughter of Jewish parents, Celia (nee Amster) and Nathan Bader, a furrier, and grew up in the Flatbush neighbourhood. She was originally called Joan, but her mother preferred her middle name, Ruth, as there were so many Joans at her high school, James Madison. Ruth was brought up in a Conservative Jewish tradition and learned Hebrew as a child, but abandoned her religion because she was not allowed to join a minyan (a group of men) to mourn her mother’s death when she was 13.

Her husband played an important part in quiet lobbying for Clinton to nominate her for the supreme court. This was by no means a likely choice. Clinton was working with a list of more than 40 candidates, all men. Clinton was anxious to make the supreme court more diverse, so Ginsburg’s Jewish religion, which she had abandoned 46 years earlier, may have counted for more than a lifetime of commitment to women’s equality before the law. Still, once her name was in the ring, Clinton was enthusiastic.”
Ruth Bader Ginsburg obituary


3. WHAT????
Not really Jewish.....but the Democrats simply pretended same to provide the illusion of diversity?????


4. And even more interesting is the Guardian doctoring that obituary when truth became....uncomfortable.
Here is what you will find now, if you tried to research the quote:


"Born in Brooklyn, New York, she was the younger daughter of Jewish parents, Celia (nee Amster) and Nathan Bader, a furrier, and grew up in the Flatbush neighbourhood. She was originally called Joan, but her mother preferred her middle name, Ruth, as there were so many Joans at her high school, James Madison. Ruth was brought up in a Conservative Jewish tradition and learned Hebrew as a child, but moved away from strict religious observance after she was not allowed to join a minyan (a group of men) to mourn her mother’s death when she was 17. Indignant at that exclusion, she nevertheless remained deeply committed to her Jewish identity.

Her husband played an important part in quiet lobbying for Clinton to nominate her for the supreme court. This was by no means a likely choice. Clinton was working with a list of more than 40 candidates, all men. Clinton was anxious to make the supreme court more diverse, and both Ginsburg’s lifetime of commitment to women’s equality before the law and Jewish identity may have been significant factors. Once her name was in the ring, Clinton was enthusiastic."



5. When questioned, the Guardian was pressed to explain the 'alteration' as follows:
"This article was amended on 22 September 2020 to clarify that while Ruth Bader Ginsburg moved away from strict religious observance at 17, her Jewish identity remained important throughout her life. Furthermore, her Jewish identity may have been a factor in President Clinton’s appointment of her to a supreme court that lacked diversity, if not so much as her commitment to women’s equality. "



After all.....one cannot embarrass the Democrats, especially the Clintons.
So you hate Jews as well. WHAT A SHOCK!!!!

Not.
 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
She was a pioneering fighter for women's rights and a brilliant and compassionate human being. Trump just highlights how she is everything he is not.
 
Ms Bader-Ginsburg should never have been seated on the American Supreme Court.

If being Jewish was her wedge, it was false.

She was not Jewish, as revealed in this thread, she was simply one more boilerplate Militant Secularist who gave up Judaism for the adoration of the Democrat mob.


But more to the point, no individual who despises the United States Constitution should be on the Court.


 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
Bader did a lot for women's rights, among other things. What exactly is your problem with that? Afraid of women?
 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
Bader did a lot for women's rights, among other things. What exactly is your problem with that? Afraid of women?
Statistically about half of the babies that got aborted were women. Even Margaret Sanger knew that was wrong.
 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
Bader did a lot for women's rights, among other things. What exactly is your problem with that? Afraid of women?
Statistically about half of the babies that got aborted were women. Even Margaret Sanger knew that was wrong.
So you're against women's rights. Why am I not surprised?
 
Let's tell it as it is.

If Donald J. Trump were not President, there would never have been all this fuss over the passing of the late Justice.

The liberal politicians & liberal media elevated her to the status of a demi-god.

People are not that stupid. They know the Dems wanted to emphasize how horrible Trump is by eulogizing the late Justice.
Bader did a lot for women's rights, among other things. What exactly is your problem with that? Afraid of women?
Statistically about half of the babies that got aborted were women. Even Margaret Sanger knew that was wrong.
So you're against women's rights. Why am I not surprised?
No. I'm for human rights.
 

Forum List

Back
Top