Who supports the ceasefire, and why?

[TimFitz]

Nonsense.

Based on what?

oh, you made it up (again).

 

[TimFitz]

Why do we want to bring down russia?

And how does bringing down the Islamic Republic bring down russia?

It doesent

The russian economy is a mere fraction of the US and NATO

Its a paper tiger

Well, our tacit support of the Russians have kept them in their war.

 

[TimFitz]

Many loose ends

maybe it is dawning on you that an unprovoked attack with no plan might not be a good idea.

 

[j-mac]

America's aggression towards Iran via Israel's rule is only encouraging them to build nuclear weapons.

Because the only countries America doesn't EFF w/are those w/nuclear weapons, e.g. North Korea.

Obama's deal was the best thing going, but the dunce had to prance in and tear it up, because..."Obama bad."

Oh, poor, poor Marc....I guess you think Marc, that writing up a deal that allows Iran to continue to enrich Uranium, where it expired in 10 years altogether, and paying them Billions in cash, that they used to bolster their proxy terrorists attacking Israel, and all the while deny IAEA inspectors, and continue to violate their word....

Why would you be so dumb about it? Living in Atlanta explains some, but not totally.

 

[PeterPilot]

Mac-7

Considering the sad state of Israel's Iron Dome and the low supply of missiles and the damage done so far, it would be easy to say that Israel needs it more than Iran.....

 

[j-mac]

maybe it is dawning on you that an unprovoked attack with no plan might not be a good idea.

Quit talking out of your ass. You don't know shit.

 

[Mac-7]

Well, our tacit support of the Russians have kept them in their war.

Thats insane

The US has never given approval of russia invasions

And we have given much aid to ukraine

 

[konradv]

So who supports the ceasefire?

As the song says “it aint me babe”

The ceasefire is only good for Iran, russia snd china

From America and Israel’s point of view it is pointless

The goal should be regime change in Iran

Otherwise bombing the nuke facilities was just a waste of time

Trump is totally out to lunch on this one

Regime change should come from within. Working behind the scenes with democratically-minded Iranians can avoid another Iraq.

 

[j-mac]

Thats insane

The US has never given approval of russia invasions

And we have given much aid to ukraine

Very true Mac, and I'll say this....I agree with the cease fire. Think about it....Israel took out many of their missiles, air defenses, and the US took out 3 major nuke plants...Now, maybe they didn't take out the entire program in one strike, but, we certainly set it back, not by months, but years, maybe decades....

And none of Iran's allies, are stepping up to help them, and now Iran want's to talk....

It's amazing.

 

[Mac-7]

Regime change should come from within. Working behind the scenes with democratically-minded Iranians can avoid another Iraq.

Yes, I agree

We should assist the Shah and his allies within Iran to topple the Islamic Republic

And to me that means continuing the military pressure

 

[j-mac]

Regime change should come from within. Working behind the scenes with democratically-minded Iranians can avoid another Iraq.

I actually agree....The Iranians are in charge of their destiny...And we should support them.

 

[konradv]

I actually agree....The Iranians are in charge of their destiny...And we should support them.

That’s what I wanted in Iraq and Ukraine, support allies with equipment, ammunition and intelligence, but don’t bomb or put boots on the ground.

 

[Mac-7]

And none of Iran's allies, are stepping up to help them,

Thats true

Iran is very isolated and therefore weak at this point in history

The ceasefire gives them a chance to catch their breath

 

[Blaster]

Well, our tacit support of the Russians have kept them in their war.

Bullshit. How many lies are you going to spread here?

 

[Mac-7]

Bullshit. How many lies are you going to spread here?

As many as he can get away with

 

[j-mac]

That’s what I wanted in Iraq and Ukraine, support allies with equipment, ammunition and intelligence, but don’t bomb or put boots on the ground.

While I think that the bombing was essential to slowing down, or stopping Iran from obtaining a nuke, I think that the people of that country are essentially responsible for their destiny.

Reports are that the current regime is hated within Iran.

 

[j-mac]

Thats true

Iran is very isolated and therefore weak at this point in history

The ceasefire gives them a chance to catch their breath

Maybe, but it also could be that it gives the powers within to mount an opposition rising up against the regime.

 

[konradv]

While I think that the bombing was essential to slowing down, or stopping Iran from obtaining a nuke, I think that the people of that country are essentially responsible for their destiny.

Reports are that the current regime is hated within Iran.

They’ve been doing the same song and dance for 30 years. Why now? IMO, it’s a “wag the dog” scenario to distract from problems with the economy and immigration.

 

[Independent thinker]

So who supports the ceasefire?

As the song says “it aint me babe”

The ceasefire is only good for Iran, russia snd china

From America and Israel’s point of view it is pointless

The goal should be regime change in Iran

Otherwise bombing the nuke facilities was just a waste of time

Trump is totally out to lunch on this one

I support a ceasefire until we get a good deal with Iran. If not, let the war games begin. If Iran genuinely wants uranium for peaceful purposes then the deal is pretty darn easy.

 

[toomuchtime_]

I support a ceasefire until we get a good deal with Iran. If not, let the war games begin. If Iran genuinely wants uranium for peaceful purposes then the deal is pretty darn easy.

Since there is no peaceful purpose for enriching uranium to 60%, it is clear that Iran wants to have at least viable nuclear threat to protect itself while it wreaks havoc across the ME, there is no possible deal that will remove that threat without ending all enrichment.