Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
Who should rule Syria? Nobody
Or at least not all of it. Grasp that and you can see a clear strategy for the West
The long civil war in Syria is still far from conclusion. Any real possibility of rebel victory ended with the entry of Russian forces last autumn — but while the initiative is now with the Assad regime, the government’s forces are also far from a decisive breakthrough. So who, if anyone, should the UK be backing in the Syrian slaughterhouse, and what might constitute progress in this broken and burning land?
It ought to be fairly obvious why a victory for the Assad regime would be a disaster for the West. Assad, an enthusiastic user of chemical weapons, against his own people, is aligned with the most powerful anti–western coalition in the Middle East. This is the alliance dominated by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Shia militias of Iraq, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. If Assad won, the Iranian alliance would consolidate its domination of the entire land area between the Iraq-Iran border and the Mediterranean Sea — a major step towards regional hegemony for Iran. So an Assad victory would be good for Islamism — at least of the Shia variety — and bad for world peace. It should be prevented.
The controversy begins when one starts to look at the alternative to an Assad victory.
In November last year, David Cameron claimed to have identified 70,000 ‘moderate’ rebels ready to challenge Islamic State in the east of Syria. That figure was a myth. Yours truly was among the very first western journalists to spend time in Syria with the rebels. I recently returned from a trip to southern Turkey, where I interviewed fighters and commanders of the main rebel coalitions. With no particular joy but a good deal of confidence, I can report that the Syrian rebellion today is dominated in its entirety by Sunni Islamist forces. And the most powerful of these are the most radical.
The most potent rebel coalition in Syria today is called Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest). It has three main component parts: Ahrar al-Sham (Free Men of the Levant), a Salafist jihadi group; Jabhat al-Nusra, until recently the official franchise of al–Qaeda in Syria, now renamed Jabhat Fatah al-Sham; and Faylaq al-Sham (Legion of the Levant), whose ideology derives from the Muslim Brotherhood branch of Sunni political Islam.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
Bashar will smash all enemies of Syria.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
No you (plural?) won't.
First Assad, user of chemical weapons against its own people= is probably just an excuse to tear his government down. The real reason is Iran, Lebanon and Syria, the terrible 3's for Israel, has to be broken up. Make no mistake that is what this is about. Saudi Arabia is so jealous of Iran as well.
Lets see Shia or radical Sunni's. Or the Kurds. Whatever happens it will be better for Israel to take part of a war torn country.
The author is the director of the : ( so its probably a little bias )
The Rubin Center for Research in International Affairs (formerly the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center), founded by the late Professor Barry Rubin, is a research center located at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel’s first private institution of higher learning.
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
So when you post an islamonazi terrorist based article do we have to assume that you are a follower of islamonazi terrorism ?
Is there a reason you cannot leave Israel out of every list you put up here?
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
No you (plural?) won't.
Well I do, anything most Zionist write is bias, and puts a favorable light on Israel and a bad light on everyone else.
Well when you post an article from an Israeli and about the area surrounding Israel, no I can't. Its relevant. Israel plays a huge role in that area, and we know they have a huge farm on the illegally occupied Golan Heights.
You're blaming me for your behaviour?
Have you no free will?
You posted it, and well if you post a jewish wrote article, we have to assume its bias.
No you (plural?) won't.
Well I do, anything most Zionist write is bias, and puts a favorable light on Israel and a bad light on everyone else.
By Zionist, you mean Jew?
