- Thread starter
- #141
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Who is to blame for Trump? You really want to know?
- Thread starter TemplarKormac
- Start date
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
lol, what shit.
The union people, along with those sympathetic to their views, in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania made Trump president.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
- Thread starter
- #144
Unlike you, I cared enough to get the facts.
Where are they? Where are these "facts" you speak of?
You want to argue that Trump won Ohio by moving further to the right than Romney?
Yes, I can. You often attribute "anger" and "fear" to conservatives and Republicans. What motivated the vote in Ohio was anger and fear. Not so much any of Trump's policy positions.
- Thread starter
- #145
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
So then, why are you arguing that he moved them left when the party has taken that position previously?
Why don't you keep up, Carbine?
- Thread starter
- #146
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
So then, why are you arguing that he moved them left when the party has taken that position previously?
Why don't you keep up, Carbine?
Silence.
- Thread starter
- #147
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
By the way, who cares what you did or didn't do elsewhere in on this board?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
So then, why are you arguing that he moved them left when the party has taken that position previously?
Why don't you keep up, Carbine?
Silence.
Because they haven't been on that left in 40 years.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
By the way, who cares what you did or didn't do elsewhere in on this board?
You implied I hadn't read it, or didn't know what it was.
- Thread starter
- #150
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
By the way, who cares what you did or didn't do elsewhere in on this board?
You implied I hadn't read it, or didn't know what it was.
Apparently you didn't read it well enough. How can a man move a party to the left when the party has previously taken a pro union position before?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Trump won with votes that Republics have not been getting in the past.
And that somehow surprises you?
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
So then, why are you arguing that he moved them left when the party has taken that position previously?
Why don't you keep up, Carbine?
Do you know that the GOP platform in 2012 supported the passage of TPP?
Could you stop being a weasel for 5 minutes?
- Thread starter
- #152
Do you know that the GOP platform in 2012 supported the passage of TPP?
Why do I care about the TPP again?
You're so stupid and presumptive enough as to assume I support every position the party takes.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
he made a legitimate appeal to labor, Big Labor, small labor, and all the labor in between. That is the biggest move to the left by a major Republican candidate we've seen in memory.
You need to read the Republican Party platform from 1956 from Eisenhower's campaign. In essence, and if you insist on putting it that way, he moved the Republican party back to it's roots. Which would be "left" if put that way.
I was the first one to post the 1956 platform on this board. Keep up.
Those fiscally responsible Democrats...
Post 138.
By the way, who cares what you did or didn't do elsewhere in on this board?
You implied I hadn't read it, or didn't know what it was.
Apparently you didn't read it well enough. How can a man move a party to the left when the party has previously taken a pro union position before?
So if you are living in Atlanta, then move to NY, and then 30 years later you move back to Atlanta,
you never moved?
WTF is wrong with you?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Do you know that the GOP platform in 2012 supported the passage of TPP?
Why do I care about the TPP again?
You're so stupid and presumptive enough as to assume I support every position the party takes.
TPP is the latest NAFTA style trade deal. Please get informed.
- Thread starter
- #155
So if you are living in Atlanta, then move to NY, and then 30 years later you move back to Atlanta,
you never moved?
I went back home.
- Thread starter
- #156
Do you know that the GOP platform in 2012 supported the passage of TPP?
Why do I care about the TPP again?
You're so stupid and presumptive enough as to assume I support every position the party takes.
TPP is the latest NAFTA style trade deal. Please get informed.
I know what it is, I just want you to edify me on why I should care about it.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Do you know that the GOP platform in 2012 supported the passage of TPP?
Why do I care about the TPP again?
You're so stupid and presumptive enough as to assume I support every position the party takes.
TPP is the latest NAFTA style trade deal. Please get informed.
I know what it is, I just want you to edify me on why I should care about it.
Because Romney and Republicans supported it in 2012.
Bernie and Trump oppose TPP.
- Thread starter
- #158
Because Romney and Republicans supported it in 2012.
Bernie and Trump oppose TPP.
Why does that matter so much to you?
I told you in July I was anti-Clinton to the bone..But I know, you have a need to feel superior...You ain't no more superior than a bum on the street..Yes, we did, but that has not given anyone with a rational mind the ability to act like a stupid kunt...And your evil incarnate anti-Christ hatefulness makes you sooo sexy....haahahahhahahh, you suck as a human........
Ooooh that hurt...not. Your middle school antics are just that, antics. You have no power, you lost it and your tears are delicious
Boo hoo a runt insulted me ......We won....suck it
Grow up, runt. Just grow up, you no more voted for Trump than I am the Queen of England.
- Mar 31, 2009
- 94,790
- 71,256
- 3,605
I told you in July I was anti-Clinton to the bone..But I know, you have a need to feel superior...You ain't no more superior than a bum on the street..Yes, we did, but that has not given anyone with a rational mind the ability to act like a stupid kunt...And your evil incarnate anti-Christ hatefulness makes you sooo sexy....Ooooh that hurt...not. Your middle school antics are just that, antics. You have no power, you lost it and your tears are delicious
Boo hoo a runt insulted me ......
Grow up, runt. Just grow up, you no more voted for Trump than I am the Queen of England.
Meh....relax, runt and your butthurt is showing
Similar threads
- Replies
- 295
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 248
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 238
- Views
- 918
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 56
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8088
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-