BuckToothMoron
Gold Member
- Apr 3, 2016
- 9,909
- 1,908
- 290
I gotta say, I take exception to Manning and Marino in that group. They were legendary passers, Marino had the quickest release all time, Manning was like a computer. However neither had the ability to really change a play or create something when the play failed. The farves, Youngs and Elways had the ability to extend a play, give their team a chance on a play that they created.
Is running ability a requirement for a great QB? And why not take exception to Brady, as well?
Brady, Montana, and Marino were/are all pretty slow as QBs go....but all did/do a very good job avoiding pressure and getting rid of the ball when necessary.
Montana was fairly nimble in the pocket, and Brady is a master at getting a yard when needed with the QB Sneak. Besides, Brady and Montana have 9 Super Bowl wins between them, and winning trumps everything. If Marino, or someone like Dan Fouts had won multiple superbowls or even gone to multiple superbowls then they’d be in the conversation.
While I don't think Super Bowls are the be all, end all of determine how good a QB was, I understand it as a measuring stick.
But winning championships is the best delineator of the greatest QB of all time
Performance under pressure and delivering cannot be ignored
It is like a closer in baseball
Compiling saves throughout the year is one thing
But shutting down a rally in game 7 of the World Series establishes greatness
Football is still a team sport. Marino is an all time great, regardless of not winning a Super Bowl, IMO.
He absolutely is, just not one of the top 5.