Who is right? Gabbard or Trump?

[Luckyone]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS and EGO, but it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

 

[imawhosure]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

Israel, and that is all that matters. The Mossad had their nose up the Iranians rearends, and knew exactly what was going on. And so, in this case, Trump is correct.......not because he 100% knew, but because of what is coming out as facts.

 

[Mac1958]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

We may not know until after the decision is made. You have to follow available intelligence and you have to listen to advisors, but it's not good when there are disagreements at the top levels.

They have to be pretty sure. I still have visions of Colin Powell, a good man, testifying on Iraq with bad information.

 

[MarcATL]

Gabbard's job is to be right, so she is.

 

[lg325]

Listen to Gabbard! Our President is reactonary on somethings he is influenced by who is talking to him at the moment. It is a serious situation but when it comes down to it listen to those with the experience and back ground.

 

[playtime]

Gabbard's job is to be right, so she is.

& MAGA has a fissure over it.

 

[JLW]

Neither Trump or Gabbard have any credibility in my book.

Based on other information from IAEA and other agencies, including previous findings from US intelligence agencies, Gabbard is right.

 

[MarathonMike]

Gabbard is talking about a nuclear missile which is currently beyond the capability of the Iranian scientists and engineers. But Iran can fashion a crude nuclear device with the material and assets they have now. That is the bigger threat.

 

[JLW]

Gabbard is talking about a nuclear missile which is currently beyond the capability of the Iranian scientists and engineers. But Iran can fashion a crude nuclear device with the material and assets they have now. That is the bigger threat.

Yeah, and Iraq had WMD.

 

[gipper]

We’ve seen the picture show before. One would have to be a total dupe of the state to believe the state.

 

[MarathonMike]

Yeah, and Iraq had WMD.

Wut? Do you not believe the IAEA reports on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium?

 

[Muhammed]

Yeah, and Iraq had WMD.

Not only did Iraq have WMD made post-1998, Al Qaeda was also producing WMD in Iraq.

 

[Luckyone]

We may not know until after the decision is made. You have to follow available intelligence and you have to listen to advisors, but it's not good when there are disagreements at the top levels.

They have to be pretty sure. I still have visions of Colin Powell, a good man, testifying on Iraq with bad information.

One thing that is "for sure" here. Evidently, Trump doesn't trust his OWN Intelligence Director to come up with the right information. Why did he choose HER? and Hegseth? They are both either incompetent or Trump is incompetent in choosing them.

 

[Luckyone]

Israel, and that is all that matters. The Mossad had their nose up the Iranians rearends, and knew exactly what was going on. And so, in this case, Trump is correct.......not because he 100% knew, but because of what is coming out as facts.

You mean to say that Trump's OWN Director of Intelligence is not in contact and up to date with the Mossad? What kind of a Director of Intelligence is she? Incompetent? or is Trump incompetent for choosing her?

Can you answer this question?

 

[Muhammed]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS and EGO, but it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

Another case of the fake news media trying to create a controversy where none exists.

And you are so ******* stupid that you fell for it again, low IQ TDS afflicted moron.

 

[imawhosure]

You mean to say that Trump's OWN Director of Intelligence is not in contact and up to date with the Mossad? What kind of a Director of Intelligence is she? Incompetent? or is Trump incompetent for choosing her?

Can you answer this question?

Sure can answer it---------------->diplomatic missions deal with each other. Trump and BiBi deal directly with each other instead. Therefore, Trump would know before Tulsi.

Is Tulsi incompetent? Not by a long shot according to Democratic standards for sure, look who they thought was AOK-)

 

[Luckyone]

Another case of the fake news media trying to create a controversy where none exists.

And you are so ******* stupid that you fell for it again, low IQ TDS afflicted moron.

Media creating controversy?

What the **** are you talking about? there is no media involved here!!!!!

Tulsi Gabbard stated "Iran is nowhere near a nuclear weapon", and Trump said "I don't care what she said (his OWN Director of Intelligence), she is wrong!"

Where in those two statements made by each person is the media involved?

 

[Sunni Man]

Gabbard's job is to be right, so she is.

Trump was elected to be right, so he is.
Tulsi Gabbard is subordinate to Trump.
Checkmate, she loses.

 

[Luckyone]

Sure can answer it---------------->diplomatic missions deal with each other. Trump and BiBi deal directly with each other instead. Therefore, Trump would know before Tulsi.

Is Tulsi incompetent? Not by a long shot according to Democratic standards for sure, look who they thought was AOK-)

View attachment 1126188

Hold on a second! Using your own post, you said "diplomatic missions deal with each other. Trump and BiBi deal directly with each other instead. Therefore, Trump would know before Tulsi.".

Tulsi stated through her own investigations and intelligence that Iran is not near having a nuclear weapon" and you think that diplomatic missions can decipher that information better than Tulsi?

Explain HOW that can happen. Do diplomatic missions have permission from Iran to inspect the nuclear facility? You think that if Iran does have nuclear bombs that they would allow the Diplomats to discover that?

Are you sane?

 

[citygator]

Gabbard reported what she knew. Trump reported what he made up. Hmmm..