Who Is Mike Johnson Protecting In The Pedo Files?

[Lesh]

Mikey knows that actually works on the Trump horde. They are all schizo.

Amazing

 

[Captain Creeper]

Read the link, clown.

There is no evidence supporting any of these allegations.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Oh no
Another crazy left wing conspiracy lol

 

[dudmuck]

Baloney. Johnson has been clear that Grijalva will be sworn in immediately when the government is reopened and the House is back in session--this is a precedent set by Nancy Pelosi by the way who refused to seat Republican members when the House was out of session.

So the only one holding up Grijalva's seating is Chuck Shumer.

It has nothing to do the with the Epstein files but the people being protected by the Republicans and Administration are the victims in those photos and videos who don't deserve to be splashed all over the internet. And shame on you who demand to see those salacious photos and videos.

a house rep can be sworn in at a pro-forma session.

this is today's summary of the files the DOJ is keeping -->

• Rumors about Donald Trump’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein have gripped the Republican Party.
• A few conservative representatives with ties to the FBI and the Justice Department have spilled that the true details of the Epstein files are “worse” for Trump than previously reported, according to journalist David Schuster.
• Michael Wolff, a longtime chronicler of Trump’s White House who conducted extensive interviews with Epstein prior to his death, told The Daily Beast last month that Epstein had shown him photos of Trump with half-naked “young girls” in his lap.
• These rumors have galvanized into a legitimate movement amongst Republicans, who are now, Schuster wrote on X Wednesday night, clamoring for the files’ full release.
• For months, just four Republicans had penned their signatures on a discharge petition demanding transparency into the investigation of the pedophilic sex trafficker and his potential associates. Those conservative lawmakers include Representatives Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert.
• Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva, who won the special election in Arizona in September, has also vowed to sign the bipartisan petition. She’s the last signature that the House needs to force a vote on the issue—and Speaker Mike Johnson has conveniently refused to swear her in for more than a month.
• But the disturbing new rumor has drudged up far more support, with “more than 100 Republicans” planning to vote alongside Democrats in an effort to “get in front of what’s coming,” reported Schuster.

 

[Lesh]

a house rep can be sworn in at a pro-forma session.

this is today's summary of the files the DOJ is keeping -->

• Rumors about Donald Trump’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein have gripped the Republican Party.
• A few conservative representatives with ties to the FBI and the Justice Department have spilled that the true details of the Epstein files are “worse” for Trump than previously reported, according to journalist David Schuster.
• Michael Wolff, a longtime chronicler of Trump’s White House who conducted extensive interviews with Epstein prior to his death, told The Daily Beast last month that Epstein had shown him photos of Trump with half-naked “young girls” in his lap.
• These rumors have galvanized into a legitimate movement amongst Republicans, who are now, Schuster wrote on X Wednesday night, clamoring for the files’ full release.
• For months, just four Republicans had penned their signatures on a discharge petition demanding transparency into the investigation of the pedophilic sex trafficker and his potential associates. Those conservative lawmakers include Representatives Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert.
• Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva, who won the special election in Arizona in September, has also vowed to sign the bipartisan petition. She’s the last signature that the House needs to force a vote on the issue—and Speaker Mike Johnson has conveniently refused to swear her in for more than a month.
• But the disturbing new rumor has drudged up far more support, with “more than 100 Republicans” planning to vote alongside Democrats in an effort to “get in front of what’s coming,” reported Schuster.

Not only CAN a Rep be sworn in during a pro forma session but Johnson has done just that

He’s gaslighting folks

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Cowardly Mike Johnson won't swear in a member of the House who was duly elected five weeks ago. There are two reasons for this.

1. She's a Democrat.

2. She will be the deciding vote on a discharge petition to force the Justice Department to release the Pedo Files.

During a shutdown or other excuse, the Speaker can hold a "pro forma" session to swear in a new member.

Here's the thing. Mike Johnson used a pro forma session to swear in two Republicans, Jimmy Patronis and Randy Fine, less than 24 hours of being elected.

Even more insane, the schizophrenic has been criticizing the Democrat for not being in her office and doing her job! I shit you not.

"Let me say this right now though, Jake. Rep. Grijalva should be working for her constituents right now. I don't know what she's doing. I keep seeing their political stunt videos. She should be in her office. She should be working or in the district for her constituents."

Someone needs to give Speaker Johnson a cognitive test like the guy he is protecting did.


Clearly, Mike Johnson is protecting someone named in the Pedo Files. He is doing flips and twists to avoid their release.

The thing is, the Pedo Files are going to come out sooner or later, and the more Mikey is seen covering up, the harsher the backlash is going to be when the inevitable happens.

Johnson is not the sharpest bulb.

Mike Johnson Gets Brutal Instant Fact Check Over The Rep He Still Refuses To Swear In​

​

Hypocrisy in the extreme:

User Clip: Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis sworn into office.

Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis sworn into office.

www.c-span.org

Its not Mike. Its his faith telling him to protect paedos.