Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
they hate regulation but love when they regulate people's private lives.... loons
What does that have to do with less regulations? Explain
Once you grow a few more brain cells, then I might.....
They had to write that rule because a libtardo went nuts and there was a fist fight. Oh, and the libtardo lost.
Her free speech was not infringed.If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
If you are, then tell turtle-necked McConnell that section 19 sucks in the senate. To NOT be allowed to openly criticize a senator on the senate floor is, first of all, an infringement of free speech, and second, kind of hypocritical for right wing morons to bitch and moan about "too many regs."...LOL
Wait till they use it to make an end run around the filibuster and not have to invoke the nuclear option to get Groshuch confirmed.
Wait till they use it to make an end run around the filibuster and not have to invoke the nuclear option to get Groshuch confirmed.
Well, what do you think of Gorsuch criticizing Trump, calling the orange clown's comments against other judges "demoralizing"???
Rickytardo, the snowflake, ran away to his safe space.They had to write that rule because a libtardo went nuts and there was a fist fight. Oh, and the libtardo lost.
Once again, someone who doesn't know what they are talking posts a remark that shows not only that, but also that they made no effort to know what they were talking about.
Senate Rule 19 was enacted in the early 20th century as a result of a heated series of scathing remarks levied by one Democratic senator against another Democratic senator.
If you were to actually know something about U.S. political history, you'd know that Democrats of that era were the conservatives, not the liberals, and you would not have made that inane remark. Applying the actual circumstances of Rule 19's creation to your ignorant remark, "they" created to rule because two conservatives "went nuts" on each other.
- A Brief History of the Senate Rule That Silenced Elizabeth Warren
- Here’s the History Behind the Senate Rule Invoked to Shut Down Elizabeth Warren
- What is ‘Rule 19?’ It was created after a fistfight in the Senate in 1902 - The Boston Globe
- HOW THE DEMOCRATS BECAME LIBERALS AND HOW THE REPUBLICANS BECAME CONSERVATIVES - The Complete Pilgrim - Religious Travel Sites
- Republicans Used to Be Liberal, Democrats Conservative. Here's What Happened. | Weekend Collective
- The Twentieth-Century Reversal: How Did the Republican States Switch to the Democrats and Vice Versa?
- Ideological Realignment in Contemporary American Politics
Sure as you likely wouldn't have written what you did. I have little doubt that you yet would have written something else that's mighty ignorant, but you wouldn't have written exactly what you did. Why am I confident that you'd have merely made some other ignorant statement? Because it's obvious that that you are so convinced of your omniscience and infallibility that you don't confirm the literal and contextual veracity of the comments you choose to publicly share. Good thing you're anonymous; that way nobody can be as sure as we are of just what a prole you are.
This is the first I've heard of it, but it sounds like a smart move to me. Proves to you regressives he thinks for himself. Of course you hypocritical regressives didn't mind the president bad mouthing judges when it was your dear leader doing it.
This is the first I've heard of it, but it sounds like a smart move to me. Proves to you regressives he thinks for himself. Of course you hypocritical regressives didn't mind the president bad mouthing judges when it was your dear leader doing it.
Actually, Gorsuch is trying to con a few democrat senators to win favor that he's a free-thinker; trying to be charming like that snake Scalia.
(btw, you used "regressive" ONLY twice......You and other moronic right wingers were instructed to use that term 4-5 times in every post....this is your last warning.....LOL)
