DukeU
Diamond Member
If it's 21. What about the 22 year old killers?????Still waiting for your magic age to purchase AR's...19 years and 3 months?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it's 21. What about the 22 year old killers?????Still waiting for your magic age to purchase AR's...19 years and 3 months?
Serious question.I know.
But this actually does have some Republican support.
So you support a national database of guns and their owners? Agreed.
A little silly to blame someone before all the facts are in. AR15 armed shooters scare the shit out of cops as they penetrate the body armor used by most, and can kill 20 people in 20:seconds in school environments. Really, the rapid fire, low recoiled, high velocity with the fire power cops normally don’t carry, makes them sitting ducks. Even if four of them enter a room, the people behind can as easily be killed as those in front in seconds, even if everyone is wear body armor. 3000 ft per second is hunting rifle velocity with minimal recoil making it an ideal cop killer. It’s not about the. Ops, it’s about the LEADERSHIP and the la k there of. Everyone would have laid their life in the line if ordered to.The system failed. He was not supposed to be able to own firearms but schools and cops did not do their job reporting him. So legally he was allowed to buy them simple as that.
Why important ?Serious question.
In the history of this country, how many teenage killers have existed?
Based on what is known about him now? Of course not. What is your point?It's a simple question, people. Do you support Ramos's right to buy, keep and bear arms?
I don’t know and I don’t think it’s relevant.Serious question.
In the history of this country, how many teenage killers have existed?
You totally missed the point.
In the dictatorship you describe, all the corrupt have to do is declare any honest person as being insane and prevented from then owning any weapons.
If a person really IS a lunatic, you do not pass universal bans on millions of firearms.
Instead you have a sanity trial to have them confined to an institution that can help them while protecting us.
The point is that all people who have not been legally declared incompetent by the judiciary, have to have equal rights.
You can't have a democracy with arbitrary levels of rights as dictated by the executive.
I didn't say it was, just curious. Why are you opposed to the question?Why important ?
There are no background checks for individual sellers, dumb ass.Joe Biden's crackhead son Hunter lied on his background check form to buy a gun and he has not been prosecuted.
He swore under penalty of a $250,000 fine and ten years imprisonment that he was not a drug addict.
So, these background checks are flawed.
BTW, the Democrats are saying that there are no background checks.
Nobody wants a wacko to have access to anything that could cause harm to others. That is pretty much a given.I'm pro 2A. But I don't support whacko's having the right to buy a gun. In the other thread I started, meant to just have a conversation, so many retards saying "shall not be infringed," didn't seem to have a clue as to what having a conversation even meant.
Those are the right wing radicals that would support someone like Ramos and his "right to keep and bear arms." Which is a total slap in the face for Americans who lost loved ones due to gun violence. Yall should be ashamed.
There's also a pattern of people dying from mandated vaccination the last two years. I noticed no one from the gun grabbing side wanting to talk about that.I don’t know and I don’t think it’s relevant.
What 18-year-olds were doing 60 years ago has little to no impact on what 18-year-olds are doing now. Times are different. There’s now a pattern of death coming from young men.
Your conspiracy theory deflection is noted.There's also a pattern of people dying from mandated vaccination the last two years. I noticed no one from the gun grabbing side wanting to talk about that.
Nobody wants a wacko to have access to anything that could cause harm to others. That is pretty much a given.
However, the last thing I would want is for Liberals to decide who can and who cannot possess firearms. They are crazy about things like this and you simply can't trust them to be reasonable.
For instance, remember when the Obama Administration came out with a paper from the Justice Department saying that veterans and people that believe in God are potential terrorists? I do.
Later veterans receiving benefits were subject to having firearms taken away or else lose benefits.
How friggin stupid is that?
In New York with that oppressive SAFE Act, which was touted as "reasonable gun control", a veteran had his firearms confiscated because he went to see a doctor about insomnia. Many more examples.
The agenda of the Left is to do away with the right to keep and bear arms because they feel it is a threat to making the US a Socialist shithole. You can't trust them to determine who can enjoy the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms and who can't.
The crime should be the illegal thing that is done with a firearm. Not the possession of the firearm.
Your ability to accept reality is also.Your conspiracy theory deflection is noted.
My ability to accept reality? Why thank you.Your ability to accept reality is also.
The guy was a loner. It’s not going to be easy to get a gun from someone else.
Raise the age limit on long guns to 21 and severely punish anyone who participates in a straw purchase.
Raise the age limit on long guns to 21
severely punish anyone who participates in a straw purchase.
The benefit to society in having free access for everyone to mental health care is something I will support. We blow so much fucking money on useless shit. We could make the cuts and find the money.Wrong.
We need public health care, so that troubled people will have someplace to go and either get help, or at least be detected before they start to murder people.