Indeed, what new states?E: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: We've come full circle several times now.
(COMMENT)So prove otherwise, why can't you?
The problem here is that our friend "PF Tinmore" does NOT actually believe in any authority other than that which supports his contention.
◈ He does NOT believe in the "Right of Self-Determination."◈ He does NOT believe in the "Convention on Rights and Duties of States."◈ He does NOT believe in the "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties."
Without a true belief in the language and the meaning of the reality of the day, he is hopelessly locked on this fallacy that concludes he is correct. And in his world, it is possible for his fallacious deductive powers to establish premises • such that • argument are true. He reshapes history by going back more than a century, to a time when the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers made its decisions and facilitated immigration into the territory for the purpose of establishing a Jewish National Home. And he believes that the immigration was an invasion (an attack) and not part of the larger outcome of the Great War.
Most Respectfully,
RI am curious as to how you draw your conclusions.◈ He does NOT believe in the "Right of Self-Determination."◈ He does NOT believe in the "Convention on Rights and Duties of States."◈ He does NOT believe in the "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties."
I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Other than breaking up the Turkish Empire allowing for the creation of new states, what did the war have to do with anything?And he believes that the immigration was an invasion (an attack) and not part of the larger outcome of the Great War.
How do you define immigration?
Indeed, shall we call that an islamist talking point?
Indeed, you cannot identify these ''new states''. It seems you have ducked this question every time posed to you.