While it is futile to suggest that anyone hold you to a consistent, rational, linear progression of assertions and facts that will form a coherent argument, we see you have again refuted your own argument. With regard to your buffoonish claim that the Treaty of Lausanne invented your imaginary 'country of Pal'istan', resolve that argument with how you frame the nonsense claims related to the links you posted.No place called Israel mentioned.The links where you said Israel isn't mentioned?Do I have to post those links again?Do you have amnesia or Alzheimer's? Both?Not true but carry on.Remember when you said none of the Armistice Agreements mentioned IsraelHas nothing to do with Palestine.Today, it is no longer a conflict which is an extension of the 1948 War. The Armistice Agreements (from which the Armistice Lines were derived) were only to "remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved."
and I showed that all of them did?
That was great, wasn't it?
Yes, that would be great!!!
The Treaty of Lausanne does not identify ''Palestine''. Consider that in the context of your silly excuse for an argument above.
No place called "Palestine" mentioned.