Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[Toddsterpatriot]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

United Nations Maintenance Page

unispal.un.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

 

[Hollie]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

The above Armistice agreement was provided earlier. It provided precisely what you chose to deny it provided.

Is it your intention to make yourself a complete buffoon?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

Do you need more than the one in #17,621?

 

[Hollie]

One really gets the impression that the Pals have traded on false grievances and a presumed entitlement that the Arab world is quickly losing interest in.

Do Arabs Really Want to Mortgage Their Future to the Palestinians?

More than 70 years after the creation of the "Palestinian problem," the Arab world is fed up, finally realizing that there is no solution that will satisfy the naysaying Palestinians.

www.newsmax.com

So you think the Arab world wants to give the Palestinians a state?

In September, the 22-member Arab League rejected the Palestinian request to condemn the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for its peace deal with Israel, confirming the political reality that, in the Mideast today, Palestinians are no longer the central concern.

Palestinian terrorism, their willingness to take military action against their Arab brothers and their alliance with Iran and Syria have fostered a belief among states like Jordan, Kuwait, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia that an independent Palestinian state would threaten the region.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

The above Armistice agreement was provided earlier. It provided precisely what you chose to deny it provided.

Is it your intention to make yourself a complete buffoon?

Still no quote,huh?

 

[Hollie]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

The above Armistice agreement was provided earlier. It provided precisely what you chose to deny it provided.

Is it your intention to make yourself a complete buffoon?

Still no quote,huh?

You mean aside from the citation you requested? The one provided to you?

No dignity, huh?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

I posted the agreements between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.

No quote, huh?

Didn't think so.

Nice duck.

The above Armistice agreement was provided earlier. It provided precisely what you chose to deny it provided.

Is it your intention to make yourself a complete buffoon?

Still no quote,huh?

DURR

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

Thanks for the link.

Interesting title.........

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

Thanks for the link.

View attachment 402069

Interesting title.........

Indeed. Israeli is not a place.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

Thanks for the link.

View attachment 402069

Interesting title.........

Indeed. Israeli is not a place.

What is Israeli?

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

Thanks for the link.

View attachment 402069

Interesting title.........

Indeed. Israeli is not a place.

You're just mindlessly spamming the thread.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Obviously, you are having trouble reading.

​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

(COMMENT)

The Agreement is an enclosure to the Letter of Transmittal. Look at it again!

Indeed. Israeli is not a place.

(COMMENT)

You can say The Israeli Government - or - You can say The Government of Israel. It means the same thing (a distinction without a difference). To attempt to argue or raise objections about a trivial matter (Israel vs Israeli)... also known as "quibbling"... is merely an attempt to change or divert the discussion. Like I've said before, this is a known tactic of yours.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

More of the mental disorder that appears so frequently from the Pals.

For some reason, we in the west still shower this illness with welfare money.


OK to murder Israeli civilians because they are all “criminals” - Hamas’ message in ‎TV series

Nan Jacques Zilberdik | Oct 16, 2020

Murdering Israeli/Jewish civilians is legitimate according to TV series produced and ‎broadcast by Hamas. ‎

In a scene on the show Self-Sacrificing Fighter (Fida’i), which was produced by Hamas’ ‎Al-Aqsa TV and rebroadcast recently, an armed terrorist enters a restaurant in Tel Aviv ‎and shoots and murders Israeli/Jewish diners.

Following the attack, a Palestinian ‎woman is being interrogated by an Israeli investigator. She explains that while Islam ‎forbids murdering civilians, killing Israelis/Jews is justified because Israelis/Jews are all ‎‎“criminals”: ‎

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is just one more meaningless question; for which you will ignore the answer.

You make a claim.
I ask you to prove your point.

Like when you claimed Israel isn't in any of the armistice agreements, eh?

Post the quote where the place called Israel is mentioned.

(COMMENT)

Each of the Armistice Agreements has a heading. Each of the Armistice has a signature of the parties to the Armistice.

• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice S/1353/Add.2 of 27 July 1949
• Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

Formal Heading: Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT​

Article V91): "Armistice Demarcation Line between the Israeli and Syrian armed forces"​

• LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE 23 March 1949

Formal Heading: LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

• Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (3 April 1949)

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: For and on behalf of the Government of Israel​

Article VI (5) "the Government of Israel agrees to pay to the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom"​

• EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT 23 February 1949

Formal Heading: EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT​

Formal Signature: FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL​

Article VI (2) "surrounding area from which Israeli forces shall be withdrawn to north of the Armistice Demarcation Line"​

This is an absolute frivolous claim you have put forth. It is neither a claim in good faith nor does it have any relevance to contemporary time. I only bother to respond to demonstrate just how inept your arguments are. This is not unlike answers I have given before in previous commentaries over the last decade. You have been given this information several times. I can only surmise that this is just another attempt at misleading the discussion.


Most Respectfully,
R

Formal Heading: HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

That is a letter. This is the agreement.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949

avalon.law.yale.edu

Thanks for the link.

View attachment 402069

Interesting title.........

Indeed. Israeli is not a place.

Indeed. You're just spamming the thread with your usual piffle.

HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL:
GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT

S/1302/Rev.1 of 3 April 1949

 

[Hollie]

It seems to be something of a nebulous argument to suggest that there is any real distinction between so much of the Pal civil society and the component Islamic terrorist promoting leadership.

‘Only terrorists need apply’ for Palestinian NGOs

It is both damning and revealing that many Palestinian civil-society organizations either have links to, or vocally support, those whose stated aim is the destruction of world’s sole Jewish state.

www.jns.org

It is both damning and revealing that many Palestinian civil-society organizations either have links to, or vocally support, those whose stated aim is the destruction of world’s sole Jewish state.

The P.A., which rules over the majority of Palestinians, has prohibited all Palestinian NGOs from cooperating with foreign funders who want to put anti-terror clauses in their funding. And, as the blogger Elder of Ziyon has documented, “if any Palestinian NGO signs a clause” saying “that they will not hire or fund terrorists, they will be prosecuted under Palestinian law.” In an Oct. 13 blog, the blogger highlights a story that many missed.

 

[Hollie]

Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan is not, how shall we say, ''a fan of the Pals'' when it comes to critique of Pal failures and inadequacies regarding peace efforts.

Yasser Arafat passed up Palestine peace deals from two US presidents: Prince Bandar

Yasser Arafat and other Palestinian leaders passed up and hindered offers to secure a lasting peace process to the Israel-Palestine conflict, said Saudi

english.alarabiya.net

Yasser Arafat and other Palestinian leaders passed up and hindered offers to secure a lasting peace process to the Israel-Palestine conflict, said Saudi Arabia’s former Ambassador to the US Prince Bandar bin Sultan on Tuesday.

In the second episode of a three-part exclusive interview with Al Arabiya, Prince Bandar shared inside information into the difficulties of the Palestinian peace process, as a veteran Saudi diplomat who served for more than 20 years in Washington.


According to Prince Bandar, who later became the Kingdom’s intelligence chief and head of national security, the Palestinian leadership undermined the peace negotiations at several stages despite Saudi Arabian efforts to secure a deal.

 

[P F Tinmore]

It seems to be something of a nebulous argument to suggest that there is any real distinction between so much of the Pal civil society and the component Islamic terrorist promoting leadership.

‘Only terrorists need apply’ for Palestinian NGOs

It is both damning and revealing that many Palestinian civil-society organizations either have links to, or vocally support, those whose stated aim is the destruction of world’s sole Jewish state.

www.jns.org

It is both damning and revealing that many Palestinian civil-society organizations either have links to, or vocally support, those whose stated aim is the destruction of world’s sole Jewish state.

The P.A., which rules over the majority of Palestinians, has prohibited all Palestinian NGOs from cooperating with foreign funders who want to put anti-terror clauses in their funding. And, as the blogger Elder of Ziyon has documented, “if any Palestinian NGO signs a clause” saying “that they will not hire or fund terrorists, they will be prosecuted under Palestinian law.” In an Oct. 13 blog, the blogger highlights a story that many missed.

Indeed, they do not want to fall into the foreign name calling trap.