Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 15,020
- 3,056
- 290
OK, but whatever the Palestinians do, Israel does more and first.
Oh please, you sound like a child.
(and don't bother with the next line I know is coming: "Its true. Look it up.")
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, but whatever the Palestinians do, Israel does more and first.
OK, but whatever the Palestinians do, Israel does more and first.RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,
Well, I sure do. It is a matter of intensity and magnitude.
(COMMENT)Do you have a point?
There is (clearly) a world of difference between the few instances wherein the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) called a fire mission of white phosphorus - and - the multiple uses of incendiary devices nearly every day.
BTW: While the UN did look into the IDF incidents involving white phosphorus (WP) and recommended against it, No treaty specifically prohibits the use of WP. However, there are several treaties that regulate munitions containing white phosphorus (WP). I recommend you look at the • 1980 Protocol on Incendiary Weapons • (Protocol III on Incendiary Weapons of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons) before making too many sweeping remarks. Again, the is a world of difference between using WP in the lumination (to mark targets).
The IDF prohibited (in all circumstances) the use of WP to make the civilian population as such, individual civilians or civilian objects the object of attack by incendiary weapons. I believe the IDF further made the use of WP to illuminate legitimate targets in target areas where the HoAP use civilian persons and objects by the placement of them in the vicinity of legitimate HAMAS hostile objectives and activities.
The UN objected as (a matter of media amplification and circus ride) the IDF use of WP located within a concentration of civilians (protected persons). I think there were a total of five incidents involving the IDF use of WP. It was, in the aftermath of those responses to Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) activity that - the IDF would discontinue the use of WP under those conditions where the HoAP are intentionally locating legitimate objectives within or near densely populated areas.
Most Respectfully,
R
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,
You might want to keep this in the back of your mind; relative to these "Incendiary Weapons." Pull it out every time people like our friend "P F Tinmore" asks the question: "What law did they commit?" Technically, the leaders of HAMAS are guilty of Plotting and Planning plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful, while the Gazan Launchers are each in violation for every act committed.
(REFERENCE)
International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing New York said:[LINK: UN Resolution and the International Convention as the Annex: A/RES/52/164]
Article 1
For the purposes of this ConventionArticle 2
3."Explosive or other lethal device" means: a.An explosive or incendiary weapon or device that is designed, or has the capability, to cause death, serious bodily injury or substantial material damage;
1.Any person commits an offence within the meaning of this Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility:Article 9
a.With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or2.Any person also commits an offence if that person attempts to commit an offence as set forth in paragraph 1 of the present article
b.With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.
The offences set forth in Article 2 shall be deemed to be included as extraditable offences in any extradition treaty existing between any of the States Parties before the entry into force of this Convention. States Parties undertake to include such offences as extraditable offences in every extradition treaty to be subsequently concluded between them.(COMMENT)
Yes, it has been a principle weapon of criminals and terrorist since before the time of the Roman Empire.
Most Respectfully,
R
There is quite a consortium of Islamic terrorist misfits aligning.
I'm just curious to know when these angry throwbacks are going to turn on each other.
Good idea. Put Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Palestinian Communist Party and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in close contact with each other to "brainstorm". What could go wrong?
Scorn for US peace plan brings Hamas, Hezbollah closer
The Lebanon-based Alliance of Palestinian Forces — comprised of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Palestinian Communist Party and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — recently requested a meeting with Hezbollah. According to Ataya, the process is at a preliminary stage, but is being pursued. The goal will be to agree on practical measures to resist Trump's plan and protect Lebanese and Palestinian interests. He remarked that converting Palestinian and Lebanese rejection of naturalization into practical steps will require brainstorming on the political and legal dimensions of the issue.
The mere presence of Jews in the Middle East is an affront to Arabs-Moslems and to the Shia Iranians. It is the Shia Iranian occupation army in Lebanon; Hezbollah, that is the greatest threat to Lebanon.There is quite a consortium of Islamic terrorist misfits aligning.
I'm just curious to know when these angry throwbacks are going to turn on each other.
Good idea. Put Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Palestinian Communist Party and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in close contact with each other to "brainstorm". What could go wrong?
Scorn for US peace plan brings Hamas, Hezbollah closer
The Lebanon-based Alliance of Palestinian Forces — comprised of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Palestinian Communist Party and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — recently requested a meeting with Hezbollah. According to Ataya, the process is at a preliminary stage, but is being pursued. The goal will be to agree on practical measures to resist Trump's plan and protect Lebanese and Palestinian interests. He remarked that converting Palestinian and Lebanese rejection of naturalization into practical steps will require brainstorming on the political and legal dimensions of the issue.
Israel withdrew from all of Lebanon in the year 2000. So what exactly are the Lebanese resisting?
While there were rumors of a ceasefire with the islamic terrorists in Gaza, not so much.
While there were rumors of a ceasefire with the islamic terrorists in Gaza, not so much.
![]()
While there were rumors of a ceasefire with the islamic terrorists in Gaza, not so much.
![]()
The recent delivery by the IDF of some islamic terrorist behavioral modifications, (as'plodins in Gaza'istan), seems to have had the desired effect on the islamic terrorists.
It seems odd that the islamic terrorists call for saving a truce amid Islamic terrorist rocket and incendiary attacks.
AMID INCREASED TENSIONS, HAMAS CALLS ON MEDIATORS TO SAVE GAZA TRUCE
Hamas calls on mediators to save Gaza truce
Arab-Israeli Conflict
19:36 | 06/13/19
![]()
Holding Israel responsible for failing to fully implement the understandings, Khalil al-Haya, a senior Hamas official, warned that Hamas may be forced to respond to the alleged foot-dragging.
Egyptian security officials are expected to visit the Gaza Strip to discuss ways of preserving the truce understandings between Hamas and Israel.
The planned visit comes amid increased tensions in light of continued projectile and incendiary balloon attacks from the Gaza Strip towards Israel.
Hamas officials claimed that Israel was searching for excuses to avoid the implementation of the truce understandings that were reached earlier this summer under the auspices of Egypt, the UN and Qatar.
They didn't mention what that was.Holding Israel responsible for failing to fully implement the understandings, Khalil al-Haya, a senior Hamas official, warned that Hamas may be forced to respond to the alleged foot-dragging.