Here yet again we are confronted with an ideological strain of cognitive-dissonance: because no ( DEPENDENT ) Israel was in existence one cannot logically use the terminology INDEPENDENT ISRAEL...you cannot appear to grasp the significance of Zionist statements prior to and following the criminal declaration of statehood...the public statements categorically refute the propaganda vessel which follows...
Are you telling us that the UN is a criminal organization?
Because it was that very same United Nations, which agreed for Israel to become Independent and declare that Independence in the absence of the Arabs also accepting the Partition of 1947
Either the UN organization IS responsible to accepting which places can become new countries and be welcomed to the UN, as Israel was, or it is not.
The Mandate for Palestine was the same as the other three Mandates. Created to help those separate areas become countries with their own infrastructure, government, etc.
Iraq and Syria and Lebanon achieved that in the 30s.
If Israel does not have the right to be an independent State on its own ancient homeland, unlike the Hashemites who took over 78% of
the Jewish homeland which was part of the Mandate for a Jewish Home/State, than NONE of those countries has a right to exist.
All of them must be dissolved.
And then what?
Is it time for the Kurds to finally have their independent country, where they have always been, or are the Arabs and Turks going to continue to fight them and call the Kurds "terrorists" because they are fighting legally and any other way to become independent from Iraq and Turkey, for now?
Or do the Kurds not have any rights and must be under Sunny or Shia Arab power, and terrorism, for as long as the Arab and Turkish leaders decide it should go on?
Wrong again dummy...the UN sponsored a ridiculously one-sided partition plan which proposed to cede 56% of Palestine to a Jewish minority that legally owned less than 5% of the lands...the recommendation was rightly voted down by the Arab States and India...when the organization later granted 'recognition' to the illegally established state of Israel the UN violated the letter and spirit of its own Charter, sworn to protect the property rights of native peoples. You next invoke this ridiculous sentence:
"If Israel does not have the right to be an independent State on its own ancient homeland"
Here again your ignorance leads...Ashkenazi Jews have no genetic relation to the ancient Hebrews, therefore they cannot 're-claim a homeland' which never belonged to them...your argument is with those Zionist leaders and politicians who plotted to steal the lands...
Guess What !!!!!
The VICTORS of WWI made the decisions.
Why? Because they were the victors.
The Arabs had no say, except to agree to live in peace with the Jews under Jewish Sovereignty.
Just as the Kurds, Yazidis, Assyrians, etc have had to live under Arab Muslim sovereignty.
Same UN.
The Jews earned recreating sovereignty over their ancient homeland the LEGAL way, you accept Jewish rights or not.
The Ashenazi Jews ARE descendants of the 12 tribes. You accept it or not.
No Jew in their right mind, and there are very few who are out of their minds, would agree that Israel has no right to exist.
You lose with the Ashkenazi Jews.
You lose with the Mizrahi Jews.
You lose with the Sepharadic Jews.
And that makes basically MOST of the 15 Million Jews on the planet.
Jews agreed to allow the Hashemites to truly steal 78 % of their ancient homeland, then.....there is nothing else that the Arabs have to belly ache about.
They now have 80% of the ancient Jewish Homeland.
They wish to undo it and return most if not all of the land to the rightful owners, the Jewish Nation, the Jewish Nation will be more than happy to accept all of that land back.
Am Israel Chai !