Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 15,003
- 3,048
- 290
For Tinmore, the "occupation" started somewhere in the mid 1800s when the mere presence of Jews on Jewish ancestral land was a violation of inviolable Arab sovereignty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For Tinmore, the "occupation" started somewhere in the mid 1800s when the mere presence of Jews on Jewish ancestral land was a violation of inviolable Arab sovereignty.
[But, but, but....the Jews started it. It is all the Jew's fault....but, but, but....]
You are mixing stories. That is why you are confused.
For Tinmore, the "occupation" started somewhere in the mid 1800s when the mere presence of Jews on Jewish ancestral land was a violation of inviolable Arab sovereignty.
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
Okaay. So, I've only watched about 48 seconds of that video and the speaker states, "We should not boycott Israel because of the debt we owe to the Jewish people."
Right away this marks this video as propaganda. The Jewish people are not asking for special consideration because of the Shoah. That is a false notion and NOT one ever put forth by the Jewish people or Israel.
We are asking simply to be treated on equal footing to all other ethnic and national groups. That means you treat us with the SAME brush that you paint all other nations.
Antisemitism is NOT the rejection of special treatment for Jews. It is the rejection of double and different standards for Jews. Learn the difference.
I am going to try to go back and stomach some more of that video. But only because I'm waiting for my hair dye to set.
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
Okaay. So, I've only watched about 48 seconds of that video and the speaker states, "We should not boycott Israel because of the debt we owe to the Jewish people."
Right away this marks this video as propaganda. The Jewish people are not asking for special consideration because of the Shoah. That is a false notion and NOT one ever put forth by the Jewish people or Israel.
We are asking simply to be treated on equal footing to all other ethnic and national groups. That means you treat us with the SAME brush that you paint all other nations.
Antisemitism is NOT the rejection of special treatment for Jews. It is the rejection of double and different standards for Jews. Learn the difference.
I am going to try to go back and stomach some more of that video. But only because I'm waiting for my hair dye to set.
Interesting, the speaker talks about boycotting or not boycotting Israel, and tin man posts the video on this thread and not the boycott one.
Is there anything on the video about the Palestinians? Showing who they are?
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
Okaay. So, I've only watched about 48 seconds of that video and the speaker states, "We should not boycott Israel because of the debt we owe to the Jewish people."
Right away this marks this video as propaganda. The Jewish people are not asking for special consideration because of the Shoah. That is a false notion and NOT one ever put forth by the Jewish people or Israel.
We are asking simply to be treated on equal footing to all other ethnic and national groups. That means you treat us with the SAME brush that you paint all other nations.
Antisemitism is NOT the rejection of special treatment for Jews. It is the rejection of double and different standards for Jews. Learn the difference.
I am going to try to go back and stomach some more of that video. But only because I'm waiting for my hair dye to set.
Interesting, the speaker talks about boycotting or not boycotting Israel, and tin man posts the video on this thread and not the boycott one.
Is there anything on the video about the Palestinians? Showing who they are?
This was in response to a post about supposed antisemitism in the Labour Party.
Do try to keep up.
And this is why everyone is running into trouble. In the Labour mainstream, ‘Palestine solidarity’ is being confused with a movement of peace. This is a dangerously false appraisal, that has allowed for maximalist Arab political demands, to become the basis for acceptance into the Labour fold.
(full article online)
Facing raw antisemitism at the Labour Party Conference 2017
Okaay. So, I've only watched about 48 seconds of that video and the speaker states, "We should not boycott Israel because of the debt we owe to the Jewish people."
Right away this marks this video as propaganda. The Jewish people are not asking for special consideration because of the Shoah. That is a false notion and NOT one ever put forth by the Jewish people or Israel.
We are asking simply to be treated on equal footing to all other ethnic and national groups. That means you treat us with the SAME brush that you paint all other nations.
Antisemitism is NOT the rejection of special treatment for Jews. It is the rejection of double and different standards for Jews. Learn the difference.
I am going to try to go back and stomach some more of that video. But only because I'm waiting for my hair dye to set.
Interesting, the speaker talks about boycotting or not boycotting Israel, and tin man posts the video on this thread and not the boycott one.
Is there anything on the video about the Palestinians? Showing who they are?
This was in response to a post about supposed antisemitism in the Labour Party.
Do try to keep up.
It is not supposed. Everyone knows that the Labour Party in England has too many anti Israel/ anti-Jewish problems.
And I was answering Susha. Thank you so much.