U.S. Congresswomen Ilhan Omar And Rashida Tlaib Set To Visit Israel
Is she going to dress in a Pirates of the Caribbean outfit and captain a flotilla of cargo boats?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
U.S. Congresswomen Ilhan Omar And Rashida Tlaib Set To Visit Israel
Today at Harvard Law School we did a WALKOUT on Israeli ambassador’s talk - “The Legal Strategy Of Israeli Settlements” (I kid you not. He came to Harvard to legitimize a war crime...).
Proud of each and every one that came and did this! The racist Israeli official had to do his talk in front of an almost empty room!
And, we kept protesting outside of course.
Coverage features a program from the “Breaking a Generation” conference: Sahar Vardi
Today at Harvard Law School we did a WALKOUT on Israeli ambassador’s talk - “The Legal Strategy Of Israeli Settlements” (I kid you not. He came to Harvard to legitimize a war crime...).
Proud of each and every one that came and did this! The racist Israeli official had to do his talk in front of an almost empty room!
And, we kept protesting outside of course.
RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ rylah, et al,
I have a difficult time identifying the claim of a violation and matching it to a specific clause in some binding reference.
This position regarding both the future of the population held hostage by the enemy's corrupt rule, as well as the ally, that in fact is the only one taking them into consideration and everything possible to protect their lives more than Europe, US or any other actor - is not only in violation of binding International Law (UN Security Council Resolution 1373 ch.4),
but as well ultimately immoral.
(COMMENT)
What specific passage in is the claim made against in the case of the unspecified violation (either international or national).
RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ rylah, et al,
As for my opinion regarding US military aid, that sums up to approximately 10% of Israel's GDP,
and in light of reasons mentioned above, with all its advantages as measured against it's undermining Israel's interests and sovereignty - is that it all should stop, and instead transferred into a framework of - Agreement For Mutual Development Partnership on equal terms.
(For Clarification Purposes
PL 116-6 Consolidated Appropriations Act 2019 said:→ provides the following for Israel:
✦·$3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing (FMF), of which $815.3 million is for off-shore procurement;
✦·$5 million in Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) for refugee resettlement
✦·$2 million in a homeland security grant;
✦·Reauthorization of U.S. loan guarantees to Israel through September 30, 2023; and
✦·Reauthorization of War Reserve Stock Allies-Israel (WRSA-I) through Sept 30, 2020.
P.L. 115-245, the Department of Defense and Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act, 2019 and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019, provides the following for Israel:
✦·$500 million in missile defense, of which $70 million is for Iron Dome, $187 million for David’s Sling,
✦·$80 million for Arrow 3, and $163 million for Arrow 2.
For FY2020, the Trump Administration requested $3.3 billion in FMF for Israel and $500 million in missile defense aid to mark the second year of the MOU. The Administration also requested $5 million in MRA humanitarian funding for migrants to Israel
(COMMENT)
The Philosophy and the Concept on the funding and the Individual aid Packages are coherent and cohesive when viewed separately. But when viewed collectively, there may be inconsistencies. It is impossible to put them all together and dovetail them without using politicalese. Increasing political-military - and development are just so much cosmetics for the global stage. This is why the proper analysis requires that each aid and funding partition requires specific examinations.
RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ rylah, et al,
(SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP)
The US - Israeli Relationship, is a complex problem must be explained carefully and must be addressed in a logical manner. Why? (RHETORICAL) Because it is NOT one program, but a culmination of spot policies that change (or could change) in each White House Administration. AND! • Policy dictates that Israel’s ability and capacity to maintain a “Qualitative Military Edge” (QME) over other countries in its region cannot be lost.
Most Respectfully,
R