White Racism did Not End When Slavery ended

Every time one of you Republicans try your bullshit about democrats, I'm going to post this.

Republicans authored an amendment to officially make slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have cemented slavery as a constitutional right.

A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican party and gained some semblance of political equality, white Republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions. The Republican Party is the party of the Lily White movement, a group of Republicans who worked to purge blacks from the party.

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Today’s Republican Party is controlled by a racist Anti-Black base.


And every time you misuse Malcolm X's words, I am going to post this:

"I am not a Republican, nor a Democrat, nor an American, and got sense enough to know it. I am one of the 22 million black victims of the Democrats, and one of the 22 million black victims of the Republicans, and one of the 22 million black victims of Americanism... You and I have never seen democracy; all we've seen is hypocracy... If you go to jail, so what? If you're black, you were born in jail. If you're black, you were born in jail, in the North as well as the South. Stop talking about the South. Long as you south of the Canadian border, you're south."

Who the fuck do you white racists think you're trying to fool with your bullshit?
 
JoeB131
She was reporting a crime and affirmative action hire Mohammed Noor shot her.

Just like white affirmative action hire Timothy Loehmann shot up a 12 year old?

I don't think you understand what you are calling Affirmative Action.

Because Affirmative Action for whites started with this:

In 1618, the Virginia colony passed "the Great Charter of privileges, orders, and laws." Among these laws was a provision that any person who settled in Virginia or paid for the transportation of another person to settle in Virginia would get fifty acres of land per person. “The right to receive fifty acres per person, or per head, was called a headright.” It got even better for colonists as those who “imported” slaves also got fifty acres per slave. The practice was continued by the government of Virginia, for 161 years, ending in 1779. Headrights were not only limited to Virginia. The headright system was used in all the original thirteen colonies. Headrights were the first of many government handouts of free stuff or guarantees providing whites with economic development assistance.

It continued with this:

The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

And with this:

The Naturalization Act of 1790 states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as they lived in the United States for at least two years and in the state where the application was filed for at least one year. This law allowed “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.” Please notice the first seven words. Only whites were entitled to be citizens of this country.

And with this:

One of the greatest miscarriages of justice in this nation’s history was a direct rebuttal to the claim that all men are created equal called Dred Scott v. Sandford. I am not going into all the particulars of this case. The court’s opinion says all you need to know. “A black man has no rights a white man is bound to respect.” The result of Dred Scott v. Sandford was that whites were given rights and status blacks were denied.Or- Affirmative Action.

And with this:

Passed in 1862, the Homestead Acts gave away 246 million acres of land. To qualify for Homestead land, a person had to be a citizen of the United States, and blacks were not given citizenship until 1866.

And this:

On April 16, 1895, the United States Supreme Court rendered another one of the sorriest decisions in American history. It is known as Plessy vs. Ferguson. From this decision came the principle of separate but equal.

And this:

The National Housing Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934.29 This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The National Housing Act is the policy that may have had the most impact on wealth accumulation in modern America.

Between 1934 and 1968, the FHA implemented and put into practice a policy that still negatively impacts communities today.30 The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess home values in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices. It was done by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA established a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions.

Redlining was the name of that grading system. My point here is the FHA was a government agency whose policies specifically provided whites with opportunities to increase wealth through homeownership. The formation of the FHA and its guaranteed loan program only worked to increase white advantage.
“Of the $120 billion worth of new housing subsidized by the government between 1934 and 1962, less than 2 percent went to nonwhite families.”

And this:

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children.Today, most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law excluded occupations mainly done by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two-thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. For years, most blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

And this:

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare, folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

And this:

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things, but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congress members, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

And this:

On June 22, 1944, President Roosevelt signed the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill.38 This law provided benefits for veterans returning from World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time, southern members of Congress fought the passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks.

Over one million returning black soldiers were unable to get GI benefits. My father was one of those soldiers.

And today white women are the number one beneficiary of affirmative action.

So when you're white trying to diss blacks with affirmative action, look in the mirror and you will see the image of the people who have benefitted the most from what you sayy affirmative Action is.
 
Every time one of you Republicans try your bullshit about democrats, I'm going to post this.

Republicans authored an amendment to officially make slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have cemented slavery as a constitutional right.

A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican party and gained some semblance of political equality, white Republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions. The Republican Party is the party of the Lily White movement, a group of Republicans who worked to purge blacks from the party.

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Today’s Republican Party is controlled by a racist Anti-Black base.


And every time you misuse Malcolm X's words, I am going to post this:

"I am not a Republican, nor a Democrat, nor an American, and got sense enough to know it. I am one of the 22 million black victims of the Democrats, and one of the 22 million black victims of the Republicans, and one of the 22 million black victims of Americanism... You and I have never seen democracy; all we've seen is hypocracy... If you go to jail, so what? If you're black, you were born in jail. If you're black, you were born in jail, in the North as well as the South. Stop talking about the South. Long as you south of the Canadian border, you're south."

Who the fuck do you white racists think you're trying to fool with your bullshit?

Which political party ended slavery in the U.S……when they had the power to do it?

Which political party wanted slavery in new states?

Hich political party wanted to restart the slave trade with Africa?

Which political started the Civil War to keep blacks as slaves?

Which political party created the Jim Crow laws?

members of which political party created the klan?



That is the only response you need….
 
JoeB131
She was reporting a crime and affirmative action hire Mohammed Noor shot her.

Just like white affirmative action hire Timothy Loehmann shot up a 12 year old?

I don't think you understand what you are calling Affirmative Action.

Because Affirmative Action for whites started with this:

In 1618, the Virginia colony passed "the Great Charter of privileges, orders, and laws." Among these laws was a provision that any person who settled in Virginia or paid for the transportation of another person to settle in Virginia would get fifty acres of land per person. “The right to receive fifty acres per person, or per head, was called a headright.” It got even better for colonists as those who “imported” slaves also got fifty acres per slave. The practice was continued by the government of Virginia, for 161 years, ending in 1779. Headrights were not only limited to Virginia. The headright system was used in all the original thirteen colonies. Headrights were the first of many government handouts of free stuff or guarantees providing whites with economic development assistance.

It continued with this:

The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

And with this:

The Naturalization Act of 1790 states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as they lived in the United States for at least two years and in the state where the application was filed for at least one year. This law allowed “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.” Please notice the first seven words. Only whites were entitled to be citizens of this country.

And with this:

One of the greatest miscarriages of justice in this nation’s history was a direct rebuttal to the claim that all men are created equal called Dred Scott v. Sandford. I am not going into all the particulars of this case. The court’s opinion says all you need to know. “A black man has no rights a white man is bound to respect.” The result of Dred Scott v. Sandford was that whites were given rights and status blacks were denied.Or- Affirmative Action.

And with this:

Passed in 1862, the Homestead Acts gave away 246 million acres of land. To qualify for Homestead land, a person had to be a citizen of the United States, and blacks were not given citizenship until 1866.

And this:

On April 16, 1895, the United States Supreme Court rendered another one of the sorriest decisions in American history. It is known as Plessy vs. Ferguson. From this decision came the principle of separate but equal.

And this:

The National Housing Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934.29 This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The National Housing Act is the policy that may have had the most impact on wealth accumulation in modern America.

Between 1934 and 1968, the FHA implemented and put into practice a policy that still negatively impacts communities today.30 The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess home values in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices. It was done by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA established a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions.

Redlining was the name of that grading system. My point here is the FHA was a government agency whose policies specifically provided whites with opportunities to increase wealth through homeownership. The formation of the FHA and its guaranteed loan program only worked to increase white advantage.
“Of the $120 billion worth of new housing subsidized by the government between 1934 and 1962, less than 2 percent went to nonwhite families.”

And this:

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children.Today, most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law excluded occupations mainly done by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two-thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. For years, most blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

And this:

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare, folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

And this:

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things, but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congress members, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

And this:

On June 22, 1944, President Roosevelt signed the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill.38 This law provided benefits for veterans returning from World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time, southern members of Congress fought the passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks.

Over one million returning black soldiers were unable to get GI benefits. My father was one of those soldiers.

And today white women are the number one beneficiary of affirmative action.

So when you're white trying to diss blacks with affirmative action, look in the mirror and you will see the image of the people who have benefitted the most from what you sayy affirmative Action is.

Plessy v Ferguson was created by a democrat controlled Supreme Court…….

3/5s. Really? That lie has been dealt with over and over again.….that compromise was created to reduce the political power of slave states……the states that would eventually become the democrat party
 
Which political party ended slavery in the U.S……when they had the power to do it?

Which political party wanted slavery in new states?

Hich political party wanted to restart the slave trade with Africa?

Which political started the Civil War to keep blacks as slaves?

Which political party created the Jim Crow laws?

members of which political party created the klan?



That is the only response you need….

Not it isn't.

Republicans authored an amendment to officially make slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have cemented slavery as a constitutional right.

A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican party and gained some semblance of political equality, white Republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions. The Republican Party is the party of the Lily White movement, a group of Republicans who worked to purge blacks from the party.

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Today’s Republican Party is controlled by a racist Anti-Black base.

THIS, is the only proper response.
 
Not it isn't.

Republicans authored an amendment to officially make slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have cemented slavery as a constitutional right.

A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican party and gained some semblance of political equality, white Republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions. The Republican Party is the party of the Lily White movement, a group of Republicans who worked to purge blacks from the party.

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Today’s Republican Party is controlled by a racist Anti-Black base.

THIS, is the only proper response.

Yeah…they were trying to avoid a war……..a war being pushed by the democrats……

Remember…..the democrat party owned the slaves……

let me repeat that since it seems to escape you….

the democrat party owned the slaves and was actively engaged in leaving the union on threat of war and the Corwin Amendment was a bid by cowards to avoid the war……..

The democrats then started the war anyway to keep blacks as their slaves……,,,,

Republicans defeated the democrats…and then, when they actually had the power…they ended slavery…..they didn’t do the Corwin amendment when they had total power to enact it….they ended slavery
 
Not it isn't.

Republicans authored an amendment to officially make slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have cemented slavery as a constitutional right.

A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican party and gained some semblance of political equality, white Republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions. The Republican Party is the party of the Lily White movement, a group of Republicans who worked to purge blacks from the party.

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Today’s Republican Party is controlled by a racist Anti-Black base.

THIS, is the only proper response.

The Republican Party fought for every single Civil Rights act…while the democrat party fought them all…until the racist lyndon Johnson told them they couldn’t win without the black vote…so after the movement was almost over , they finally joined in….…as a politician he voted against every Civil Rights act including the anti- lynching laws
 
Wow, so much crazy From Paul... so Much Crazy

Let this be a lesson. You just can’t sneak up on certain negros in a dark alley at midnight with loud noises and fireworks goin off in the background. Especially ones who come from war torn areas.

Gee, maybe if this guy was that fragile, he never should have been a cop. Like most of the whites who shoot unarmed blacks, there were plenty of warning signs that Mohammed Noor should have never been given a gun.


So it didn't matter that Noor had been the subject of three complaints of unprofessional conduct including a lawsuit that alleges he brutalized another woman in May 2017. Terminating him would require answering to the city's powerful Muslim advocacy groups, something no Democrat in Minnesota wants to do.

If that was a Black woman that pounded on the trunk of a police car in a dark alley, knowing they were investigating a violent crime, they would have called her ghetto, and said she deserved what she got. If she was black we'd know her whole criminal history along with a mugshot but there's none of that cause she's was a white woman.

Can you cite a case where this actually happened? We'll wait.

And her family was awarded a record pay

Until Career Criminal Geo. Floyd got a larger payout.

They never made her (Damond Family) fight for the €18.19 million. They just announced it the day after he (Mohammad Noor) was convicted. Her family didn't have to sue or settle for it. It was just given away.

again, I have to wonder why you keep using sources that use Euros instead of dollars in the stories... makes me think you are in a Troll Farm in Russia.

When the families are black they have to sue, incur cost, take them through the entire legal process before they settle right before the trial years later. The central park 5 from 20 years ago are STILL fighting to get paid and she got paid out IMMEDIATELY.

Apples and Oranges. The Central Park Five were arrested for wilding when the cops decided they were good for the Central Park Jogger rape. They were hardly "innocent".

You're projecting because the system of white supremacy is the biggest AA for white people.
You spelled "Hard Work" wrong.

Well it's not a big deal according to you. You're the person that says the police make millions of arrests and only 30 or so are killed. Funny how you change you tune now a white women get's killed by a black cop eh ?.

And as for "not a big deal" When has a BW ever got such drooling and fan worship like this

You mean other than Career Criminal Geo. Floyd?

1656494860012.png


How many black people were on social media mocking her ?

How many black people were digging up her past ?
How many black people were throwing her in the mud ?
How many black people were blaming white society and white families ?
How many black people turned into amateur Columbos and try to find evidence to say she deserved it ?

There actually has to be something there to FIND. Ms Damond by all accounts was a model citizen.
 
You know the way you and other whites supremacists do with any blk person killed by a cop

This is why I LOVE being black. We will NEVER debase ourselves and lower ourselves to think like you and other white supremacists. We will always keep our humanity. We could never think like you. God just didn't make us that way. He just didn't give us that heart.

But you and other white supremacists will lose every ounce of humanity you have just so you can stick it to those blacks !!!!

Yeah, during 2020, the neighborhood my brother lives in, had signs in front of the houses of first responders that read "Heroes Live Here" during Covid. After Career Criminal Geo. Floyd was killed, people drove by any house with one of these signs and took potshots and threw bricks. The signs came down very quickly.

And these are people in positions of power and authority. The police is a career choice for white supremacist and in great demand.

Really? Then why do so many police departments face shortages.


You've demonized police, they've been retiring or quitting in droves, new people don't want to sign up.

And this was Pre- Covid/Riots.

Heck, to use him as a bad example. Four police departments rejected Timothy Loehmann for a job, he was in the process of being fired from a fifth, and then Cleveland signed him right up! Why? Because no one better was sending in a resume.

Speaking of resumes, most of my clients in other fields want to advance in their professions. The two fields I see people wanting resumes to get out of are cops and teachers.

But the fact is

White nationalism and supremacy are incompatible with the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

If you believe in the former, you cannot uphold the latter and should not be trusted to do so.

Likewise, someone who adheres to racist beliefs about Black people, for instance, would be at high risk for violating the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and the due process protections of both the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

I don't disagree with this.. It's too bad you have demonized police work so badly that no one wants to sign up for it.

Polygraph them all and take out the trash. The FBI administers lie detector tests to all recruits. There is no reason these could not be administered to police recruits to ferret out extremist beliefs.​


Oh sure, the police and maybe you will scream that polygraphs are unreliable — but that’s rich coming from the same people who seek to administer them to virtually every criminal suspect they bring in for questioning.

The problem there is that when the cops give you a polygraph, they already know you did it. It's bullshit technology developed by a comic book writer (literally, the guy who invented the Polygraph also invented Wonder Woman) and it's main purpose is to throw suspects off guard.

If an employer ever wanted to give me a polygraph, I'd tell them to go fuck themselves.

If what you say is true that the police is full of great people and I'm just crazy for thinking white supremacists are all over police deps then this will be largely meaningless. It would only snag a few of them. Right ?

Again- see above. We have police shortages because it's already a shitty job.

Now, I've known a lot of cops in my life. Even have one in my extended family. The real problem I see with police is not that they are inherently racist, but that it's a job that really wears you down. If you are a cop, you are NOT seeing people at their best. You are seeing people who have either committed a crime, or have just been the victims of a crime or tragedy. Multiply that by every day for years and years... no wonder the divorce rate among cops is so high... or the suicide rate. And you can't seek psychiatric help, because it's considered a sign of weakness.

Not defending people like Jason van Dyke, Darren Chauvin, or Mohamed Noor. These guys fucked up. Probably never should have been cops to start with. And I would be all for systems that identify them and weed them out. The first and biggest reform I would make is stop letting the FOP and PBA defend bad cops. All three of these chuckleheads had previous incidents that should have had someone taking a long hard look at their performance.
 
Just like white affirmative action hire Timothy Loehmann shot up a 12 year old?

Uh, Loehmann wasn't hired because of Affirmative Action. Loehmann was hired because Cleveland is such a shithole no one wants to be a cop there. Kind of like what we are all seeing these days, with the labor shortage, and you wonder, "Where does human resources find these clowns?"



I don't think you understand what you are calling Affirmative Action.

Because Affirmative Action for whites started with this:

You mean hundreds of thousands of whites who died because they were trying to free the slaves?

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things, but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congress members, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

Yes, this is a valid criticism of FDR... that he played this balancing act between liberals and blacks in the North and White conservatives in the south. I mean, what a prick, making compromises to save the country from the Great Depression and then saving the world from Fascism!

Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. When blacks got Civil Rights, the Republican Party did not believe that was civil or right and decided that extremism in defense of liberty was no vice. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

Um, not exactly. The GOP stopped getting black support in 1932. They got maybe 30% of the black vote all the way up until 1964, when Barry Goldwater opposed the CRA. But I think that this is the problem with putting all your eggs in one basket. I'm pretty critical of the GOP and its sometimes less than subtle appeals to racism, but it's not like they've been given any incentive to seek black votes.

And today white women are the number one beneficiary of affirmative action.

Except they don't want it or need it. Sure, everyone was not keen on women in the workplace in 1970... but by 1990, it was considered normal.

So when you're white trying to diss blacks with affirmative action, look in the mirror and you will see the image of the people who have benefitted the most from what you sayy affirmative Action is.

So when that company gave a job to that lady who was less qualified and less talented to fill a quota, how was I benefiting again? And when I ended up doing all her work with no job protection because I was still a contractor, how was
 
Since we’re not listening to each other and we’re just repeating ourselves:






Every year blacks kill hundreds more whites than whites kill blacks. This racial cleansing has been going on for decades. Some activists are indifferent but blacks also murder many blacks.

Yet another Marxist mass murderer:

I’m sure we all acknowledge that Kaepernick is a ridiculous fraud.
And speaking of frauds:




And more:
b2427_chart9_750px.jpg



 
Last edited:
JoeB131
Gee, maybe if this guy was that fragile, he never should have been a cop. Like most of the whites who shoot unarmed blacks, there were plenty of warning signs that Mohammed Noor should have never been given a gun

Hey - Cops only shoot a small number of people according to you. They make millions of arrests and only 35 people get killed. Why are you still talking about Justine Damond ?

JoeB131
Can you cite a case where this actually happened? We'll wait.

Every single case of BW getting killed by cops. White supremacists justify it

JoeB131
If you are a cop, you are NOT seeing people at their best. You are seeing people who have either committed a crime, or have just been the victims of a crime or tragedy. Multiply that by every day for years and years...

Get out my face.

Do you know what's hard ? Coming home and telling black sons and daughters that their mother, father, brother or sister was killed by a cop and having people like you and most of white society go out of there way to prove how much of scum bag they were.

I'm REALLY not the person you want to speak to if you're expecting me to have empathy or understanding for these white supremacist cops.

We're told to "Fk off and sort the crime out and out of wedlock rate out and chicago and gangbangers out" "And that black person deserved to die because [insert anything negative]"

So don't come at me like this because I'll show you the EXACT same heart of stone energy you show us

So I say FK YOU

JoeB131
Now, I've known a lot of cops in my life. Even have one in my extended family. The real problem I see with police is not that they are inherently racist, but that it's a job that really wears you down. No wonder the divorce rate among cops is so high... or the suicide rate.

That's because of the system of white supremacy. This is what me and IM2 are telling you.

You would think that dealing with poverty, racism, crumbling schools and dilapidated housing as is common for many blk ppl - would be pretty stressful. Yet, it's whites, drink alcohol, use drugs, or smoke cigarettes and kill themselves (suicide is linked more to having one's previously high status threatened than to absolute hardship)

The system of white supremacy makes whites lack coping skills

Whereas many blk ppl who face oppressive conditions must, as a matter of survival, learn to deal with these conditions from an early age, those who have been pampered dont learn the same lessons.
.
Not to romanticize racism - white supremacy, of course, but the folks you have taught to hate often have more self control that ppl in your own family.

None of this is to say that I shall be pitying these cops but if we're going to analyze what's wrong with this culture, then we should begin with the folks at the top, not as the old saying goes, the fish tends to rot from the head down.

JoeB131

And you can't seek psychiatric help, because it's considered a sign of weakness.

I'm a massive boxing fan. I grew up on Mike Tyson

1656541276938.png


You only know about yourself in life when you're faced with resistance when there is something to overcome.

A doctor is not a doctor, until there's a kid, whose been in an accident and is wheeled into the hospital and everyone is crying and screaming outside, and he's lying there all fked up and this is not in the textbook and then it'd down to you. The doctor has gotta figure it out. You pass that test ? Now you're a doctor

You're not in a fight until there's pressure and resistance Tyson's talent was so great and so superior that the other stuff never got tested. It was just an athletic contest. He was blowing guys out and then ?
  • 6 times there was resistance.
  • 6 times it became a real fight.
  • 6 times there was something to overcome and he failed all 6 times.
That's why, to me, Tyson's record isn't 55 wins 6 losses. It's 0 wins 6 losses.

He's only ever been in 6 fights

Tyson did a lot weak things and I dunno if he raped that girl, maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but I know from certain people that he did a lot of weak things. Like as a teen, helping old ladies upstairs with their groceries b4 robbing them when he got to the door.

So when you do weak things and now you have to do STRONG thing. How do you become strong when you know you did those weak things and you know that's really you ?

And you've got a guy called Evander Holyfield

1656537733467.png


And he doesn't give a sh*t, about how hard you hit, your gonna have to be make him a believer, by doing in a difficult place because he's gonna make it difficult because he ain't gonna co-operate

When that happens you gotta fell like that person ? And when you don't feel like that person. You do this

1656537967789.png


YOU WIMP OUT and do what Tyson did. That was his way to get out

And that can be related to the cops and them being suicidal and depression. See when your killing and mistreating unarmed black people, they know that's weak, so as I said before, few weeks ago in Uvalde Texas, a kid goes into a school and starts unloading rounds.

machine-gun-sylvester-stallone.gif


Dead bodies everywhere. Now they gotta go in there and do a strong thing and handle that and they didn't pass the test because white supremacy is WEAK. That's why the police departments is full of people who could'nt crush a grape with a baseball bat and wimp out at any signs of resitance. That's where the stress is coming from. That's where the divorce rates are coming from

JoeB131
Not defending people like Jason van Dyke, Darren Chauvin, or Mohamed Noor. These guys fucked up. Probably never should have been cops to start with.

Look. People who think like you and Van Dyke and Chauvin. Can't be reformed

JoeB131
And I would be all for systems that identify them and weed them out. The first and biggest reform I would make is stop letting the FOP and PBA defend bad cops.

Problem is - White people have made the white supremacists the most powerful

The good cops are not the ones with the muscle.

Systems have their own logic, and they operate as they are designed to operate, with or without the approval of all who turn the gears of the machine. You can even push against the gears if you like, but the machinery is stronger than you, which is why, in the case of policing, so few reforms end up changing the nature of law enforcement in America.

JoeB131
All three of these chuckleheads had previous incidents that should have had someone taking a long hard look at their performance.

Is that it ? So white supremacist infiltrate law enforcement and you think telling them "to take a hard look at their performance" is really gonna do anything ?

giphy.gif
 

Attachments

  • 1656514961790.png
    1656514961790.png
    41.2 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
Hey - Cops only shoot a small number of people according to you. They make millions of arrests and only 35 people get killed. Why are still talking about Justine Damond ?

Same reason I make a big deal about Floyd and McDonald... because it shouldn't have happened.

Every single case of BW getting by cops. White people justify it


Again- see above. We have police shortages because it's already a shitty job.

So you don't actually have such a case, then.

Get out my face.

Do you know what is hard ? Coming home and telling black sons and daughters that the mother, father, brother or sister was killed by a cop and having people like you and most of white society go out there way to prove how much of scum bag they were.

Actually, you don't need to go "out of your way". Usually what they were doing at the time they got shot is what got them shot.

I'm REALLY not the person you want to speak if you are expecting me to have some sort of empathy or understanding for these white supremacist cops

You and other whites you tell us to "Fk off and sort the crime out and out of wed lock rate and chicago and gangbangers out" "And that black person deserved to die because [insert anything negative]"

So don't come at me like this because I'll show you the EXACT same heart of stone energy you show us

again, you complain about the handful of black people killed by cops under questionable circumstances, and not the thousands of blacks killed by gangbangers and drugs. Seems to me you have your priorities mixed up.

Cops kill far more white people than blacks, except the white community realizes that if dipshit had a long criminal record and whipped out a gun in front of a cop, it's really not a great loss.

That's because of the system of white supremacy. This is what me and @IM2 are telling you.

You would think that dealing with poverty, racism, crumbling schools and dilapidated housing as is common for many blk ppl - would be pretty stressful. Yet, it's whites, drink alcohol, use drugs, or smoke cigarettes and kill themselves ( suicide is linked more to having one's previously high status threatened than to absolute hardship.)

Okay, I guess if you want to blame all your failures on Whites, then you do you, man.

I'm a massive boxing fan. I grew up on Mike Tyson

You mean the guy who raped a young black teenager and is still considered a "hero" in the community?

Dead bodies everywhere. Now they gotta go in there and do a strong thing and handle that and they didn't pass the test because white supremacy is WEAK. That's why the police departments is full of people who could'nt crush a grape with a baseball bat and wimp out at any signs of resitance. That's where the stress is coming from. That's where the divorce rates are coming from

Oh, please... you guys threaten cops with the ruination of their lives if they take action, and then bitch when they don't take action. Make up your mind.

Is that it ? So white supremacist infiltrate law enforcement and you think telling them "to take a hard look at their performance" is really gonna do anything ?

Uh, Noor was black. As for Van Dyke, his sister is married to a black man, so he's doing a pretty bad job as a White Supremecist. His BIL wanted to make public statements on his behalf and the family told him not to, as they were already getting enough grief.

All three of these guys were in the wrong. Only Chauvin is going to spend any considerable amount of time in prison. And that's kind of messed up.

Now, me, I'm an "ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" kind of guy. You do better training, better screening, you identify the bad apples before they do something serious.
 
JoeB131
Gee, maybe if this guy was that fragile, he never should have been a cop. Like most of the whites who shoot unarmed blacks, there were plenty of warning signs that Mohammed Noor should have never been given a gun

Were there? I didn't see Paul trying to criminalize the woman as if she deserved to die. But the comparison to what white cops have done by Paul is fair. Why do you mfers always have an excuse to justify a wrong committed by whites while condeming blacks for doing the same thing? You are too fkng stupid to see the attitude of entitlement you have and that attitude is only because you are white. This is what we're talking about when we speak about white privilege.

I notice you don't say shit about what happened to Philando Castile or


1656542884602.png

So tell us Joe, what criminal record did this one year old have? If the child lives it will suffer brain damage for the rest of his life.


What's your excuse for this or for the kid paralyzed in your city while holding his hands up?

You've never said a damn word about Homan Square, and that place operated by denying constitutional rights for blacks. In your city. But you have every excuse on earth for no good white thugs in a police uniform.
 
Last edited:
Were there? I didn't see Paul trying to criminalize the woman as if she deserved to die. But the comparison to what white cops have done by Paul is fair. Why do you mfers always have an excuse to justify a wrong committed by whites while condeming blacks for doing the same thing? You are too fkng stupid to see the attitude on entitlement you have and its only because you are white. This is what we're talking about when we speak about white privilege.

I haven't been on speaking terms with my brother and his wife for five years because I condemned what Jason van Dyke did... (they are friends)
The difference is Justine was a model citizen. She was in fact reporting a crime, doing the good citizenship thing, and she got shot by an affirmative action hire. No excuse for that.
Laquan McDonald was vandalizing trucks, running around brandishing a knife. Still no excuse for what Van Dyke did.
George Floyd was driving around high on drugs, passing fake money, and resisting arrest. Still no excuse for what Chauvin did.

Seems only one of us is being intellectually consistent.

I notice you don't say shit about what happened to Philando Castile or

Well, you didn't bring him up until now. I've stated on numerous other threads that Castille's shooting was straight up wrong. He had a legal carry permit. He informed the cops he did.

What's your excuse for this or for the kid paralyzed in your city while holding his hands up?
You mean the kid who was shot because a thug got into a shootout with cops and put him and his mother in the crossfire.

From your story...

The 30-year-old man in question was a suspect in two aggravated robberies who was already being chased by police when he jumped out of a car he crashed during the chase. The suspect – who was armed with a gun – then entered Smalls’ car.

Hey, here's the thing. I think it should be really hard for thugs to get guns. But don't go whining to me when you have thugs out there with guns, who gets into a firefight with cops, and bystanders get killed. If he drove off with the car and then killed the mother and child, that would be okay by you, because, hey, at least it wasn't some cracker cop doing it.

You've never said a damn word about Homan Square, and that place operated by denying constitutional rights for blacks. In your city. But you have every excuse on earth for no good white thugs in a police uniform.

You mean other than all the other times I've condemned the collective stupidity known as the "War on Drugs"?
 
JoeB131
Same reason I make a big deal about Floyd and McDonald... because it shouldn't have happened.

Now what's the punishment ? Talk about PUNISHING race soldiers 4 harming Black citizens.

When blk ppl fk up ? We don't get the "It shouldn't have happened" We get very specfic court dates. Very specfic sentences. Very specfic harsh punishments.

JoeB131
So you don't actually have such a case, then.

You are always going to defend the vast majority of black ppl being killed by law enforcement and even on the rare case that you don't, you will never demand punishment which is part of the code of white supremacy

JoeB131
Uh, Noor was black.

And that means what ?

JoeB131
As for Van Dyke, his sister is married to a black man

And that means what ?

JoeB131
So he's doing a pretty bad job as a White Supremecist.

See this guy ?

1656551409099.png


His name is Gregory Bush. He's a white supremacist who went into a church in Kentucky and killed two black people in 2019. He wanted to kill more but the door was locked. Guess what ? He had a black wife and two black sons

Dylan Roof the white supremacist who went into a black church and killed 11 elderly black. Guess what ? He had black friends.




Thomas Jefferson had kids to black women but defended slavery. George Zimmerman the man who killed Trayon Martin had a blk girlfriend.

Elvis had many black friends. Listened to blk music growing up but he was racist after all he said "Negroes are only good for buying my records and shining my shoes"

1656551520094.png


But Van Dyke's sister being married to a black man is supposed to impress me ? That's supposed to mean something ?

I wouldn't be suprised if he (Van Dyke) and other police officers were givin her all kinds of sh*t and Van Dyke and his family disowned her.

JoeB131
All three of these guys were in the wrong. Only Chauvin is going to spend any considerable amount of time in prison. And that's kind of messed up.

Why is it messed up ?

JoeB131
Now, me, I'm an "ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" kind of guy. You do better training, better screening, you identify the bad apples before they do something serious.

You think you are gonna better train this ?



That's David Grossman and he's booked to do police trainings most of the year.



JoeB131
Oh, please... you guys threaten cops with the ruination of their lives if they take action, and then bitch when they don't take action. Make up your mind.

Well this is just you trying to justify why blk ppl deserve to be killed. So you're coming with the old "I felt threatened"

But out of all the streotypes black men have - The black brute is the strongest one. It's the strongest because it's based on fear. Deep down whites know that if a black man bashed in their brains it would not be completely undeserved.

Even in your blindness, you know the history of this country. The media is very clever at forcing the public to have the opinion they want.

What whites fear most is that many of you know, on some deep buried level, that if they were in our position, they would feel a murderous rage towards whites.

I think on a level that is so buried it’s in their deep-subconscious, you're aware of the violence, and the THREATENED violence, it takes to keep a system like this going and you are aware of the collective privileges you get from it and you also know, again subconsciously, that Black rage is justified.

JoeB131
Again, you complain about the handful of black people killed by cops under questionable circumstances

As I've said many times.

Are more black people killed by black people than by the police ?

Yeah you’re correct.

But guess what ?

You would have been correct 100 years ago.

But would that justified the lynching and hangings from the Klan ?

The black on black crime figure will always be higher that white on black. Why ? Because those are the people you live around.

You're argument is as stupid as me telling a woman with breast cancer, not worry about it because Lung Cancer is the biggest cancer killer.

Saying, Black people need to do A before they can do B is stupid. Why can’t blk ppl do both? The sequential nature of the argument is false. You don’t have to do one BEFORE you do the other. While some are addressing one problem, other’s can be addressing another.

You’re argument falls on its face on the grounds mere stupidity.

If I said, “This pack of wolves needs to wait until NONE of the wolves are injured before they hunt for food” would be illogical. What’s to stop the uninjured wolves from hunting for food for the pack while the injured wolves are recovering?

But I guess white people are the only people in America, that can be outraged about more than one tragedy, within their own racial group

The police are held to a higher standard. Because if you have the power to kill me, then you better believe I'm gonna hold you to a higher standard.

It's the same way a teacher can't be late often for their class and then turn around and say "Well some of you are late too"

With great power comes greater responsibility, they are the rules

JoeB131
And not the thousands of blacks killed by gangbangers and drugs. Seems to me you have your priorities mixed up.

Once again. You repeating an argument you have made before. This is all you do. Crime is mostly intra-racial. That means there will always be way more black-on-black crime than white-on-black crime. While it is true that most black murders are black-on-black, it is just as true that most of white murders are white-on-white.

As I have said many time you are trying makes the worth of black life conditional. Once blacks get black-on-black crime under control, then they can act as if their lives matter, then they can act as if they should have justice, then they can act as if they are human beings with human rights. Meanwhile the worth of white life is taken seriously, as absolute, as not being conditional.

Whites like you and MarathonMike love talking about the dreaded specter of black crime, but you’re pretty damned cloak-and-dagger when it comes to the issue of what to do about it.

Or better still, what to do about the blacks themselves.

But actions speak louder than words and the actions of the police killing and mistreating blk folks speak directly to what whites really want to do with unruly blacks. Hence the silent, tacit approval of police officers shooting and killing blacks for offenses real and imagined.

Deep down, white America kicks itself each and every day for not doing to the black man what it effectively did with the native man.

But through a combination of socioeconomic corralling (being priced out of neighborhoods and having existing, affordable ones plowed under), judicious policing (slave patrols reborn), destruction of family bonds (black men missing from families due to incarceration and/or death) and the encouragement of self-loathing, self-defeating pathologies, white Americans are doing a pretty good job of taking care of the “black problem.”

JoeB131
Cops kill far more white people than blacks, except the white community realizes that if dipshit had a long criminal record and whipped out a gun in front of a cop, it's really not a great loss.

OK. And how many of those white people were unarmed ?
 
Last edited:
JoeB131
All three of these guys were in the wrong. Only Chauvin is going to spend any considerable amount of time in prison. And that's kind of messed up.

Noor went to prison. He reacted and made a mistake. Chauvin had 9 minutes to take his knee off Floyds neck and didn't. That's why he's doing big time. There is no equivalences in these situations. George Floyd wasn't banging on a police car in the middle of thd night. And you don't mention Kim Potter who decided to stop somebody for an air freshener tree hanging on his rear view mirror and ended up "accidently" pulling the trigger on her gun thinking it was a taser. Or that's the story she to the court.
 

Forum List

Back
Top