White men killed more American police than any other group this year

[Asclepias]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

And yet more black males die at the hands of other black males. Is this going somewhere? The Black lives matter movement seems a little deludes and mislead. But I digress...

No one said anything about BLM or Black on Black crime. Dont deflect. I know its tempting to run from the spotlight but try to stay on point.

Yeah. right. Hinting and alluding to. How are you kidding? Black males slaughter each other, ignore. A rare few bad (?) white cop actions gets this mind blowing scrutiny. Why is that?

I dont know why your deflecting other than the obvious. White people hate concentrating on their many inadequacies in their culture. Focus. White guys kill more cops than anyone.

What I find to be interesting is how people( mostly white people) generally associate the BLM movement with an "anti police" movement.

True, black people are murdered at a higher "rate" by other blacks than they are by white police officers, however whites are also murdered at a higher rate by whites, and every other demographic is also more often a victim of intra racial homicide.

Whites are also absolutely killed more often by police than other races , because they are proportionately a larger percentage of the population.

What people fail to recognize about the BLM movement is that they are pointing out that UNARMED Blacks are DISPROPORTIONATELY murdered by police, and are 7 TIMES more likely to be killed by police when they are unarmed than any other demographic.

That is what BLM is challenging. It stands to reason that if most suspects can be aprehended in a NON LETHAL manner, could police potentially murder LESS unarmed black suspects?

It also stands to reason that even when an unarmed INNOCENT black person is stopped by police, they have a VERY GOOD reason to be frightened......based on statistics.

Only a damn fool would not understand that.


Its funny as hell to me that the same white people who express fear of black people in general being violent, do not understand the fear that many black men have of potential police violence....especially when statistics show that they have a reason for concern.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...94563e-fa74-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html

You can trust and believe this is not a case of the terminal stupids by whites. Its a case of attempting to change the narrative like they always do when faced with the truth. They dont want to admit that their rationale for looking the other way is is predicated on believing that Blacks are just asking for it. If they actually begin to believe an entire race of people were not hallucinating then that would break down other fragile mental walls they have set up in their heads. Mentally I dont think whites could handle the truth.

 

[Asclepias]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

You're a fucking moron. Hispanics are listed as white in those stats.

Lots of Hispanics are white moron.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

You're a fucking moron. Hispanics are listed as white in those stats.

Lots of Hispanics are white moron.

No shit, you half a fag... XXXX - Mod Edit -- Stay WAY away from family.. But most aren't..yet they're included in the white Hispanic stats too. Look at you stupid fucks still claiming Zimmerman is a 'white Hispanic', when he has black blood and native peruvian blood and looks mestizo.

 

[Asclepias]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

You're a fucking moron. Hispanics are listed as white in those stats.

Lots of Hispanics are white moron.

No shit, you half a fag... Single mother raised shemale... But most aren't but they're included in the white Hispanic stats too. Look at you stupid fucks still claiming Zimmerman is a 'white Hispanic', when he has black blood and native peruvian blood and looks mestizo.

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

You're a fucking moron. Hispanics are listed as white in those stats.

Lots of Hispanics are white moron.

No shit, you half a fag... Single mother raised shemale... But most aren't but they're included in the white Hispanic stats too. Look at you stupid fucks still claiming Zimmerman is a 'white Hispanic', when he has black blood and native peruvian blood and looks mestizo.

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Listen Blacktop Orangutan, the brown and even some black Hispanics are listed as white.

 

[Asclepias]

DHS was right in their report a few years ago



Seventy-one percent of police who've been shot and killed this year weren't murdered by black men with cornrows or hoodies. They weren't gunned down by Latino gang members in low-rider drive-bys. Those stereotypes would be too convenient. Instead, 71% of police who've been shot and killed so far in 2016 have been killed by good old-fashioned white men.


You best believe that if a 59% rise in the number of police officers shot and killed in the line of duty could be blamed on immigrants, Mexicans, or black folk, it would be a regular conservative talking point.

Instead, Donald Trump has never mentioned these fallen officers on the campaign trail because it may have very well been his supporters who did

KING: White men killed most cops in 2016, conservatives silent

You're a fucking moron. Hispanics are listed as white in those stats.

Lots of Hispanics are white moron.

No shit, you half a fag... Single mother raised shemale... But most aren't but they're included in the white Hispanic stats too. Look at you stupid fucks still claiming Zimmerman is a 'white Hispanic', when he has black blood and native peruvian blood and looks mestizo.

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Listen Blacktop Orangutan, the brown and even some black Hispanics are listed as white.

Prove it cave gibbon. You know I dont trust your monkey hoots as actual facts.

 

[flacaltenn]

Why can't you 2 simians just get along? If you're gonna play together, be nice...
It's distracting. And degrading the convo..

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Whites

ALEX PFEIFFER
Reporter


9:52 PM 07/13/2016

The federal government and most state governments don’t consider Hispanic/Latino as a racial category — instead, most crimes committed by Hispanics are counted under the category “white.”

The Bureau of Prisons, for example, has relatively up-to-date statistics on the racial and ethnic composition of prisoners. As of May 28, 2016, 58.8 percent of federal prisoners are white, 37.7 percent are black, 2 percent are Native American, and 1.5 percent are Asian. Hispanics are not included in the race statistics, and the category only appears under ethnicity.



Read more: How The Federal Government Inflates Crime Statistics For Whites

 

[Divine Wind]

What I find to be interesting is how people( mostly white people) generally associate the BLM movement with an "anti police" movement.

True, black people are murdered at a higher "rate" by other blacks than they are by white police officers, however whites are also murdered at a higher rate by whites, and every other demographic is also more often a victim of intra racial homicide.

Whites are also absolutely killed more often by police than other races , because they are proportionately a larger percentage of the population.

What people fail to recognize about the BLM movement is that they are pointing out that UNARMED Blacks are DISPROPORTIONATELY murdered by police, and are 7 TIMES more likely to be killed by police when they are unarmed than any other demographic.

That is what BLM is challenging. It stands to reason that if most suspects can be aprehended in a NON LETHAL manner, could police potentially murder LESS unarmed black suspects?

It also stands to reason that even when an unarmed INNOCENT black person is stopped by police, they have a VERY GOOD reason to be frightened......based on statistics.

Only a damn fool would not understand that.


Its funny as hell to me that the same white people who express fear of black people in general being violent, do not understand the fear that many black men have of potential police violence....especially when statistics show that they have a reason for concern.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...94563e-fa74-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html

Thanks for the link. It was very illuminating. More about it below: Police shootings 2016 database

Re BLM, while I agree that most are peaceful, they do provide a fertile field for violent members to grow and attack police. Additionally, they've fostered lies such as "hands up, don't shoot" (didn't happen that way) and have fostered rhetoric which could be taken as supporting violence against police.

Your numbers about "Blacks are DISPROPORTIONATELY murdered by police, and are 7 TIMES more likely to be killed" as proven by your own link. Hyped up, twisted rhetoric at best, deceitful lies at worst.

369 whites were killed by police and 195 blacks. Of the whites, 218 had either a gun or a toy gun resulting in 59.1% of whites killed by police. Of 195 blacks killed, 130 had a gun or toy gun giving 66.7%. By those numbers, black criminals are not only more likely to be armed with a gun (or what appears to be a gun). If you are using "Blacks are only 13% of the population versus 74% whites" in your "7 TIMES" figure, don't forget to use that same exact proportion in the number of armed black criminals.

Other numbers from your study:
Killed by police: 369 Whites, 195 Blacks
Gun White 54.7% Black 61.0%
Knife White 5.7% Black 8.7%
Vehicle White 5.7% Black 5.6%
Toy Gun White 4.3% Black 5.6%
Other White 5.4% Black 4.1%
Unarmed White 5.4% Black 8.2%
Unknown White 5.7% Black 6.7%

 

[Divine Wind]

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Is Tiger Woods black, white or Asian? He's half Asian, one quarter black, one eighth Native American and one eighth white. Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

According to geneticists, the old categories of race don't exist. They're more about family history than racial groups. In the US, the difference between blacks and whites is primarily cultural not racial even though many still play the race politics game.

Tiger Woods Ethnicity, Nationality, Parents Race: Black Or Cablinasian? Mother, Father Family Bio
TIGER WOODS INVENTS 'CABLINASIAN'
The golfing champion went on to state that as a child he’d invented the term, “Cablinasian” to describe his parents multi-ethnicity and nationality — a mix of half Asian (Chinese and Thai), one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American and one-eighth Dutch. He’d adopted the term as a way of honouring his mother Kultida (of Thai, Chinese and Dutch ancestry) as well as respecting all aspects of his cultural and racial heritage.
Woods disclosure riled many within the African American community because they saw him as the first black winner of the US Masters — a sports star who was one of their own, whose success in breaking down golf's racial barriers was a source of racial pride for them. Woods, by declaring himself 'unblack', had stripped all that away.

BLACK BY THE 'ONE-DROP' RULE
It was a bold break out move by the sports star — one that is being echoed today in other parts of modern America by a young generation seeking their own ethnic civil rights movement — the right to self-authorship, without defaulting to past conventions of race and ethnicity. During the American slave era it was whites that decided who was black, in terms of people of mixed heritage. The notorious “one-drop” rule, passed as law from 1910 onwards, classified as legally “black”, any individual with as little as one drop of “black blood”. It was a legal method of discriminating against all peoples with African ancestry.
“Cablinasian” hinted at a brave new world in which people with parents of mixed ethnicity and nationality could create their own socio-cultural category which would eventually be recognised within the national census. In fact, this world started early for Woods. As a schoolboy, when he filled out forms, he would tick both boxes marked African American and Asian. In the early 1960s, multi-racial actress Dorothy Dandridge pointed the way to the future when she described herself in her autobiography Everything And Nothing, not as African American, but as “mixed American”.
In the 1970s a mixed-race movement began gaining ground in America, led by young multiracial citizens, interracial couples and parents who had adopted children transracially. Woods 1997 declaration effectively put him at the forefront of the movement. “Whether he wants to or not, he is sort of becoming the poster person for multiracial identity,” said Ramona Douglass, president of the Association of MultiEthnic Americans. In the same year Republican Tom Petri proposed legislation for a multiracial check box to be included in the coming 2000 census — he called it the “Tiger Woods bill”.

 

[Asclepias]

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Is Tiger Woods black, white or Asian? He's half Asian, one quarter black, one eighth Native American and one eighth white. Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

According to geneticists, the old categories of race don't exist. They're more about family history than racial groups. In the US, the difference between blacks and whites is primarily cultural not racial even though many still play the race politics game.

Tiger Woods Ethnicity, Nationality, Parents Race: Black Or Cablinasian? Mother, Father Family Bio
TIGER WOODS INVENTS 'CABLINASIAN'
The golfing champion went on to state that as a child he’d invented the term, “Cablinasian” to describe his parents multi-ethnicity and nationality — a mix of half Asian (Chinese and Thai), one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American and one-eighth Dutch. He’d adopted the term as a way of honouring his mother Kultida (of Thai, Chinese and Dutch ancestry) as well as respecting all aspects of his cultural and racial heritage.
Woods disclosure riled many within the African American community because they saw him as the first black winner of the US Masters — a sports star who was one of their own, whose success in breaking down golf's racial barriers was a source of racial pride for them. Woods, by declaring himself 'unblack', had stripped all that away.

BLACK BY THE 'ONE-DROP' RULE
It was a bold break out move by the sports star — one that is being echoed today in other parts of modern America by a young generation seeking their own ethnic civil rights movement — the right to self-authorship, without defaulting to past conventions of race and ethnicity. During the American slave era it was whites that decided who was black, in terms of people of mixed heritage. The notorious “one-drop” rule, passed as law from 1910 onwards, classified as legally “black”, any individual with as little as one drop of “black blood”. It was a legal method of discriminating against all peoples with African ancestry.
“Cablinasian” hinted at a brave new world in which people with parents of mixed ethnicity and nationality could create their own socio-cultural category which would eventually be recognised within the national census. In fact, this world started early for Woods. As a schoolboy, when he filled out forms, he would tick both boxes marked African American and Asian. In the early 1960s, multi-racial actress Dorothy Dandridge pointed the way to the future when she described herself in her autobiography Everything And Nothing, not as African American, but as “mixed American”.
In the 1970s a mixed-race movement began gaining ground in America, led by young multiracial citizens, interracial couples and parents who had adopted children transracially. Woods 1997 declaration effectively put him at the forefront of the movement. “Whether he wants to or not, he is sort of becoming the poster person for multiracial identity,” said Ramona Douglass, president of the Association of MultiEthnic Americans. In the same year Republican Tom Petri proposed legislation for a multiracial check box to be included in the coming 2000 census — he called it the “Tiger Woods bill”.

Tiger is Black. He just wants to be white. Notice even though he is half Asian he starts his made up word with the white word.

 

[Divine Wind]

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Is Tiger Woods black, white or Asian? He's half Asian, one quarter black, one eighth Native American and one eighth white. Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

According to geneticists, the old categories of race don't exist. They're more about family history than racial groups. In the US, the difference between blacks and whites is primarily cultural not racial even though many still play the race politics game.

Tiger Woods Ethnicity, Nationality, Parents Race: Black Or Cablinasian? Mother, Father Family Bio
TIGER WOODS INVENTS 'CABLINASIAN'
The golfing champion went on to state that as a child he’d invented the term, “Cablinasian” to describe his parents multi-ethnicity and nationality — a mix of half Asian (Chinese and Thai), one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American and one-eighth Dutch. He’d adopted the term as a way of honouring his mother Kultida (of Thai, Chinese and Dutch ancestry) as well as respecting all aspects of his cultural and racial heritage.
Woods disclosure riled many within the African American community because they saw him as the first black winner of the US Masters — a sports star who was one of their own, whose success in breaking down golf's racial barriers was a source of racial pride for them. Woods, by declaring himself 'unblack', had stripped all that away.

BLACK BY THE 'ONE-DROP' RULE
It was a bold break out move by the sports star — one that is being echoed today in other parts of modern America by a young generation seeking their own ethnic civil rights movement — the right to self-authorship, without defaulting to past conventions of race and ethnicity. During the American slave era it was whites that decided who was black, in terms of people of mixed heritage. The notorious “one-drop” rule, passed as law from 1910 onwards, classified as legally “black”, any individual with as little as one drop of “black blood”. It was a legal method of discriminating against all peoples with African ancestry.
“Cablinasian” hinted at a brave new world in which people with parents of mixed ethnicity and nationality could create their own socio-cultural category which would eventually be recognised within the national census. In fact, this world started early for Woods. As a schoolboy, when he filled out forms, he would tick both boxes marked African American and Asian. In the early 1960s, multi-racial actress Dorothy Dandridge pointed the way to the future when she described herself in her autobiography Everything And Nothing, not as African American, but as “mixed American”.
In the 1970s a mixed-race movement began gaining ground in America, led by young multiracial citizens, interracial couples and parents who had adopted children transracially. Woods 1997 declaration effectively put him at the forefront of the movement. “Whether he wants to or not, he is sort of becoming the poster person for multiracial identity,” said Ramona Douglass, president of the Association of MultiEthnic Americans. In the same year Republican Tom Petri proposed legislation for a multiracial check box to be included in the coming 2000 census — he called it the “Tiger Woods bill”.

Tiger is Black. He just wants to be white. Notice even though he is half Asian he starts his made up word with the white word.

....annnnnd once again you prove my point to be 100% correct. Thanks!

Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

 

[katsteve2012]

What I find to be interesting is how people( mostly white people) generally associate the BLM movement with an "anti police" movement.

True, black people are murdered at a higher "rate" by other blacks than they are by white police officers, however whites are also murdered at a higher rate by whites, and every other demographic is also more often a victim of intra racial homicide.

Whites are also absolutely killed more often by police than other races , because they are proportionately a larger percentage of the population.

What people fail to recognize about the BLM movement is that they are pointing out that UNARMED Blacks are DISPROPORTIONATELY murdered by police, and are 7 TIMES more likely to be killed by police when they are unarmed than any other demographic.

That is what BLM is challenging. It stands to reason that if most suspects can be aprehended in a NON LETHAL manner, could police potentially murder LESS unarmed black suspects?

It also stands to reason that even when an unarmed INNOCENT black person is stopped by police, they have a VERY GOOD reason to be frightened......based on statistics.

Only a damn fool would not understand that.


Its funny as hell to me that the same white people who express fear of black people in general being violent, do not understand the fear that many black men have of potential police violence....especially when statistics show that they have a reason for concern.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...94563e-fa74-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html

Thanks for the link. It was very illuminating. More about it below: Police shootings 2016 database

Re BLM, while I agree that most are peaceful, they do provide a fertile field for violent members to grow and attack police. Additionally, they've fostered lies such as "hands up, don't shoot" (didn't happen that way) and have fostered rhetoric which could be taken as supporting violence against police.

Your numbers about "Blacks are DISPROPORTIONATELY murdered by police, and are 7 TIMES more likely to be killed" as proven by your own link. Hyped up, twisted rhetoric at best, deceitful lies at worst.

369 whites were killed by police and 195 blacks. Of the whites, 218 had either a gun or a toy gun resulting in 59.1% of whites killed by police. Of 195 blacks killed, 130 had a gun or toy gun giving 66.7%. By those numbers, black criminals are not only more likely to be armed with a gun (or what appears to be a gun). If you are using "Blacks are only 13% of the population versus 74% whites" in your "7 TIMES" figure, don't forget to use that same exact proportion in the number of armed black criminals.

Other numbers from your study:
Killed by police: 369 Whites, 195 Blacks
Gun White 54.7% Black 61.0%
Knife White 5.7% Black 8.7%
Vehicle White 5.7% Black 5.6%
Toy Gun White 4.3% Black 5.6%
Other White 5.4% Black 4.1%
Unarmed White 5.4% Black 8.2%
Unknown White 5.7% Black 6.7%

And your point is what?

My point was that UNARMED blacks are 7 times more likely to be killed by police based in relative population size, or did you just choose to ignore that fact?

Unarmed means "not in possesion of a weapon"

If you had actually read the data in the study and used the simple tools to drill down through the information, you would have noticed that 38 unarmed black people were killed by police versus 20 unarmed white. Almost 2 times the difference which is a disparity that deserves questioning.

Of those 38 blacks killed there were investigations conducted that cleared all officers of any wrong doing.

Now of course we know that every single police investigation is completely above board, right?

Of course they would never suppress any facts or manipulate the truth, because they are never wrong.....are they?

 

[Divine Wind]

And your point is what?...

That you are twisting the numbers by failing to give the full picture.

 

[katsteve2012]

And your point is what?...

That you are twisting the numbers by failing to give the full picture.

I didn't twist the numbers. They are what they are.

The part of "the picture" that I illustrated were UNARMED people who did not present a deadly threat, and quite possibly could have been arrested without being gunned down.

It is not my problem that you do not wish to acknowledge that.

 

[Asclepias]

Dont get upset cave gibbon. All the white hispanics are listed as white and all the Black hispanics are listed as Black. Zimmerman has mostly white blood and thats why he is listed as white. He is over 70% white.

Is Tiger Woods black, white or Asian? He's half Asian, one quarter black, one eighth Native American and one eighth white. Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

According to geneticists, the old categories of race don't exist. They're more about family history than racial groups. In the US, the difference between blacks and whites is primarily cultural not racial even though many still play the race politics game.

Tiger Woods Ethnicity, Nationality, Parents Race: Black Or Cablinasian? Mother, Father Family Bio
TIGER WOODS INVENTS 'CABLINASIAN'
The golfing champion went on to state that as a child he’d invented the term, “Cablinasian” to describe his parents multi-ethnicity and nationality — a mix of half Asian (Chinese and Thai), one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American and one-eighth Dutch. He’d adopted the term as a way of honouring his mother Kultida (of Thai, Chinese and Dutch ancestry) as well as respecting all aspects of his cultural and racial heritage.
Woods disclosure riled many within the African American community because they saw him as the first black winner of the US Masters — a sports star who was one of their own, whose success in breaking down golf's racial barriers was a source of racial pride for them. Woods, by declaring himself 'unblack', had stripped all that away.

BLACK BY THE 'ONE-DROP' RULE
It was a bold break out move by the sports star — one that is being echoed today in other parts of modern America by a young generation seeking their own ethnic civil rights movement — the right to self-authorship, without defaulting to past conventions of race and ethnicity. During the American slave era it was whites that decided who was black, in terms of people of mixed heritage. The notorious “one-drop” rule, passed as law from 1910 onwards, classified as legally “black”, any individual with as little as one drop of “black blood”. It was a legal method of discriminating against all peoples with African ancestry.
“Cablinasian” hinted at a brave new world in which people with parents of mixed ethnicity and nationality could create their own socio-cultural category which would eventually be recognised within the national census. In fact, this world started early for Woods. As a schoolboy, when he filled out forms, he would tick both boxes marked African American and Asian. In the early 1960s, multi-racial actress Dorothy Dandridge pointed the way to the future when she described herself in her autobiography Everything And Nothing, not as African American, but as “mixed American”.
In the 1970s a mixed-race movement began gaining ground in America, led by young multiracial citizens, interracial couples and parents who had adopted children transracially. Woods 1997 declaration effectively put him at the forefront of the movement. “Whether he wants to or not, he is sort of becoming the poster person for multiracial identity,” said Ramona Douglass, president of the Association of MultiEthnic Americans. In the same year Republican Tom Petri proposed legislation for a multiracial check box to be included in the coming 2000 census — he called it the “Tiger Woods bill”.

Tiger is Black. He just wants to be white. Notice even though he is half Asian he starts his made up word with the white word.

....annnnnd once again you prove my point to be 100% correct. Thanks!

Only the racist idiots who believe in the one-drop rule think he's black.

If that was your point you sound stupid. He has more than one drop of Black blood.

 

[xyz]

If you had actually read the data in the study and used the simple tools to drill down through the information, you would have noticed that 38 unarmed black people were killed by police versus 20 unarmed white. Almost 2 times the difference which is a disparity that deserves questioning.

I agree with your points: that black people are killed disproportionately by police, in much higher numbers in correlation to population size.

Still though, I also find it sad that many of the cases of unarmed white people getting killed by police are getting less attention, even though they could also help in some way to get some police reform through, and because they are also abuses of the police that should be punished.

There are many cases, I found a whole bunch of videos on youtube.

 

[Asclepias]

If you had actually read the data in the study and used the simple tools to drill down through the information, you would have noticed that 38 unarmed black people were killed by police versus 20 unarmed white. Almost 2 times the difference which is a disparity that deserves questioning.

I agree with your points: that black people are killed disproportionately by police, in much higher numbers in correlation to population size.

Still though, I also find it sad that many of the cases of unarmed white people getting killed by police are getting less attention, even though they could also help in some way to get some police reform through, and because they are also abuses of the police that should be punished.

There are many cases, I found a whole bunch of videos on youtube.

If they highlighted cases of whites getting killed then they would have already done something about the cops. They dont want to do that because its easier for whites to accept what the cops are doing if its only happening to "those people".

Also I think doing so would highlight the difference in why the different races were killed and the lengths cop go through in order to spare lives prior to having to shoot a white suspect vs a Black one.

 

[Buck111]

If you had actually read the data in the study and used the simple tools to drill down through the information, you would have noticed that 38 unarmed black people were killed by police versus 20 unarmed white. Almost 2 times the difference which is a disparity that deserves questioning.

I agree with your points: that black people are killed disproportionately by police, in much higher numbers in correlation to population size.

Still though, I also find it sad that many of the cases of unarmed white people getting killed by police are getting less attention, even though they could also help in some way to get some police reform through, and because they are also abuses of the police that should be punished.

There are many cases, I found a whole bunch of videos on youtube.

If they highlighted cases of whites getting killed then they would have already done something about the cops. They dont want to do that because its easier for whites to accept what the cops are doing if its only happening to "those people".

Who are "they"?

 

[xyz]

If you had actually read the data in the study and used the simple tools to drill down through the information, you would have noticed that 38 unarmed black people were killed by police versus 20 unarmed white. Almost 2 times the difference which is a disparity that deserves questioning.

I agree with your points: that black people are killed disproportionately by police, in much higher numbers in correlation to population size.

Still though, I also find it sad that many of the cases of unarmed white people getting killed by police are getting less attention, even though they could also help in some way to get some police reform through, and because they are also abuses of the police that should be punished.

There are many cases, I found a whole bunch of videos on youtube.

If they highlighted cases of whites getting killed then they would have already done something about the cops. They dont want to do that because its easier for whites to accept what the cops are doing if its only happening to "those people".

Also I think doing so would highlight the difference in why the different races were killed and the lengths cop go through in order to spare lives prior to having to shoot a white suspect vs a Black one.

Yeah, probably, if they had interviews with their families on TV and so on.

And often (although not always), it's the same mentality that gets the white people killed: they dress like hip-hoppers, or hippies, or whatever other group that particular cop hates. Of course you can't say it's racism because it defies the category of race, but it's a similar mentality.