The Murder Of Alex Pretti Broke Trump's Misinformation Machine

[Carl in Michigan]

He should have been arrested not shot. He didnt meet the test for deadly force. He was disaremed and helpless when shot

It would have been better, but you're judging from a distance and the passage of time. It would have been better it Pretti didn't interfere with law enforcement. You might face a similar fate if you interfere with a cop trying to arrest a murderer, rapist, kidnapper. The truth is, the left loves that he died. They need their martyrs

 

[Hafar1014]

They were adults who made their own dumb choices. I feel nothing for them

How Christian of you

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Reality seems strange to the Left Wingers

Okay let's try again:

TroglocratsRdumb said:
Interfering with an arrested is a felony crime.
Who was "arrested"?

TroglocratsRdumb said:
Pretti attacked the ICE officers with a loaded gun.
The way your statement reads (is structured) implies that Pretti used his loaded gun TO attack ICE officers.

Grammatically, it says Pretti is the subject performing the action (attacked) using a loaded gun as the instrument of that action.

He didn't USE his lawfully carried firearm to either attack ICE agents or defend himself. He never drew or unholstered his weapon.

TroglocratsRdumb said:
It was a justified self defense shooting
You're mistaken in your conclusion. It was neither self-defense nor justified because the agents who shot him did so while he was lying defenseless on the ground, facedown. At that point they were not facing an imminent threat of grievous bodily harm or death.

In my opinion, the agents would have been better off had this not relieve him of his firearm right before two of the agents shot Pretti to death.

TroglocratsRdumb said:
The corrupt Democrats are causing the ICE arrest violence problem.
So nothing to do with the out-of-control and violent way ICE agents are interacting with the public including U.S. citizens?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

You are in denial of the facts.

Alex Pretti’s Sig handgun has history of accidentally firing — offering possible clue to why border agent shot him

The P320 model is widely carried by armed civilians and US law enforcement, including ICE — but has been the subject of more than 100 allegations that it has a defect that allows it to fire “…

nypost.com

Interfering with an arrest is a felony crime.

Concealed​

When being arrested while carrying a concealed firearm, it is crucial to understand the legal implications and follow the proper procedures. Here are some key points to consider:

• Duty to Inform: Many states have "Duty to Inform" laws that require concealed carry permit holders to inform law enforcement of their concealed carry status. This can be done at the beginning of the encounter or even before the officer asks for identification.
• Temporary Confiscation: Upon being informed of the firearm, law enforcement may temporarily confiscate the weapon during the arrest. This is a standard procedure and is not a violation of the law.
• Separate Charges: A DUI arrest or conviction can lead to separate charges for carrying a firearm while under the influence, which can be classified as either a misdemeanor or felony.
• Administrative Review: A DUI arrest can trigger an administrative review of your concealed carry permit, which is separate from criminal court proceedings. The issuing authority may suspend or revoke your permit pending the outcome of the DUI cas
  It is essential to be aware of the laws in your state and to comply with any duty to inform requirements. If you are pulled over while carrying a firearm, follow the officer's instructions carefully and avoid sudden movements towards the weapon's location. Always have your driver's license, vehicle registration, proof of insurance, and carry permit in an easily accessible location.
  https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=f57f...y9kdXR5LXRvLWluZm9ybS1tYXAtY2N3LTIwMjUv&ntb=1

Your very first paragraph states "Duty to inform: Many states have a duty to inform law...." which is completely irrelevant to what matters which is whether the state of Minnesota has a Duty to Inform law. It does not:

Minnesota Statutes § 624.714 (Permit to Carry a Pistol):
(a) A permit holder must have the permit card and photo ID in their immediate possession and must display them upon lawful demand by a peace officer.
(d) Upon the request of a peace officer, a permit holder shall disclose to the officer whether or not the permit holder is currently carrying a firearm.

Furthermore. at which was he expected to have the opportunity to inform the agents even had he been required to do so? He had just sprayed him in the face with whatever they were carrying which I'm sure at least momentarily disoriented or incapacitated him. There were about 4 agents all hitting & attacking him at once.