White House inadvertently texted top-secret Yemen war plans to journalist

[Kruska]

Before what had taken effect ?

The air and naval based strikes onto several Houthi targets. - with a two hour prior leak, on behalf of those participating on an insecure chat medium, outside of a secure operations/situation room, but additionally chatting from "worldwide" insecure locations.

The real "concerning" part to me is, that none of these chat-morons noticed, nor bothered to ask as to WHO is this JG. locked into a highly confidential - group chat. And this is where ALL need to take responsibility. Since this JG could just as well have been a foreign adversary.

Maybe China, Russia, etc. national intelligence departments are even "enraged" about this JG having exposed this "convenient" listening-in, mechanism.

Just as the NSA was enraged - upon a German journalist having uncovered that German government leaders phones and sensitive companies servers, had been tapped and additionally hacked into by the NSA.

 

[Kruska]

So what is this supposed to mean ? Is it suggesting that it was a set up somehow ? What is AIPAC ? Who will investigate it, the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA ?

AIPAC = American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel (Zionist) US lobby, that has around 120,000 members.

Therefore this "claim", is somewhere between ludicrous to improbable.

 

[jc456]

You got a source for that claim?

A war-plan consist of several components - one of theses are e.g. Tactical & Times information's pertaining to the "Operational Plans".

As such giving this kind of information 2 hours ahead of a PLANNED attack/strike - is leaking "Secret" or rather "Top Secret" details about an impending strike that is part of a war-plan.

This guy from cnbc says it all

 

[Kruska]

This guy from cnbc says it all

This "entertainment channel" POLITI BRAWL, for the "mentally challenged" is YOUR source?

Furthermore this video Blah blah doesn't mention anything about as to what constitutes a war-plan.

 

[jc456]

This "entertainment channel" POLITI BRAWL, for the "mentally challenged" is YOUR source?

Furthermore this video Blah blah doesn't mention anything about as to what constitutes a war-plan.

Why would it?

 

[Nostra]

Does Hegseth know the difference?

Since he has been in war, yes.

 

[jc456]

Does Hegseth know the difference?

Do you?

 

[Kruska]

Why would it?

Maybe you should watch it yourself - first ??
Feel free to point out where war-plans and it's composition are being "supposedly" discussed.

Since YOU brought in as a supposed source, to back up your claim.

 

[jc456]

Maybe you should watch it yourself - first ??
Feel free to point out where war-plans and it's composition are being "supposedly" discussed.

Since YOU brought in as a supposed source, to back up your claim.

It shows the actual hypocrisy

 

[Kruska]

Do you?

Judging upon what Hegseth has "contributed" so far to this "leak-issue" - It's unquestionable that Nuthin' Fancy possesses more common sense in regards to this matter.

 

[jc456]

Judging upon what Hegseth has "contributed" so far to this "leak-issue" - It's unquestionable that Nuthin' Fancy possesses more common sense in regards to this matter.

Or not

 

[Kruska]

It shows the actual hypocrisy

No it only shows the never-ending desperate and meaningless efforts, that MAGA;s and their supporters are forwarding to deflect from an incompetent bunch of people under the Trump administration.

NONE of these mindless "comparisons" has anything in common with the issue at hand - namely - highly confidential information that places US troops and national security at risk - being openly discussed on an insecure media and an unknown and non-cleared participant having been locked in.

Those 13 killed in Afghanistan had not been placed into harms way via an irresponsible chat two hours prior on an insecure media and a non-cleared participant listening in. Neither is this the case in regards to Hillary's emails, or any of these other ridiculous comparisons.

It's now the TRUMP administration to take actions onto miserable performances by it's own administration and NOT to endlessly whine and cry about the mistakes of a previous administration. But that MAGA style, is indeed the way children behave, exercised and demonstrated daily by the Chief Kid in charge.

BTW, has he already admitted that Putin has been screwing him so far, all the way???

 

[jc456]

No it only shows the never-ending desperate and meaningless efforts, that MAGA;s and their supporters are forwarding to deflect from an incompetent bunch of people under the Trump administration.

NONE of these mindless "comparisons" has anything in common with the issue at hand - namely - highly confidential information that places US troops and national security at risk - being openly discussed on an insecure media and an unknown and non-cleared participant having been locked in.

Those 13 killed in Afghanistan had not been placed into harms way via an irresponsible chat two hours prior on an insecure media and a non-cleared participant listening in. Neither is this the case in regards to Hillary's emails, or any of these other ridiculous comparisons.

It's now the TRUMP administration to take actions onto miserable performances by it's own administration and NOT to endlessly whine and cry about the mistakes of a previous administration. But that MAGA style, is indeed the way children behave, exercised and demonstrated daily by the Chief Kid in charge.

BTW, has he already admitted that Putin has been screwing him so far, all the way???

Even the demofk cnbc guy saw it. Called the creep out! Hahaha. Hypocrites

 

[beagle9]

The air and naval based strikes onto several Houthi targets. - with a two hour prior leak, on behalf of those participating on an insecure chat medium, outside of a secure operations/situation room, but additionally chatting from "worldwide" insecure locations.

The real "concerning" part to me is, that none of these chat-morons noticed, nor bothered to ask as to WHO is this JG. locked into a highly confidential - group chat. And this is where ALL need to take responsibility. Since this JG could just as well have been a foreign adversary.

Maybe China, Russia, etc. national intelligence departments are even "enraged" about this JG having exposed this "convenient" listening-in, mechanism.

Just as the NSA was enraged - upon a German journalist having uncovered that German government leaders phones and sensitive companies servers, had been tapped and additionally hacked into by the NSA.

But no one could enter the chat unless invited right ?
Sounds to me like the one that everyone should have a huge issue with was the one that did the invite.

 

[Contumacious]

So what is this supposed to mean ? Is it suggesting that it was a set up somehow ? What is AIPAC ? Who will investigate it, the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA ?

AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. it’s a group of Americans who lobby on behalf of Israel. They’re for anything Israel. And they’re a very effective lobbying group. …

How AIPAC Operates - LewRockwell

“America is a thing you can move very easily.” –Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Tucker Carlson (TC:) So what’s AIPAC? Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY (TM:) AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And they didn’t start out as a PAC in the sense of a political action committee...

www.lewrockwell.com

In a 4 part series FOX News showed that Israel had advanced knowledge of the 09/11 attacks but refused to share the intel and the Israelis celebrated after we were hit.



Secretary of State Madeline Albright refused to take any action against Israel .

Because they own Congress no investigation or punishment will occur. The powers-that-be will again let these bastards get away with murder

 

[Kruska]

But no one could enter the chat unless invited right ?

So far that seems to be the case.

Sounds to me like the one that everyone should have a huge issue with was the one that did the invite.

For sure - and serious questions in regards to "Competence" need to be laid forward by the Republican Intel House Committee - as to why ALL participants;

1.) used a "known" insecure media,
2.) discussed confidential information outside of a secure-room - one of them was even in some Moscow hotel & if I am not mistaken even at the Kremlin at the time "texting"!!.
(usually even at the level of visiting a MoD - handheld phones are strictly forbidden). If so Russia screwed up as well

3.) none of them noticing that an unknown JG was participating/locked into the conversations
4.) the totally unprofessional way - in which this incident was refuted and denied !!

Therefore IMO, it isn't just the person who did the invite - that needs to face respective consequences.

 

[Rambunctious]

No one cares.... at least we have a coherent president who is not always on vacation....

 

[Kruska]

AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. it’s a group of Americans who lobby on behalf of Israel. They’re for anything Israel. And they’re a very effective lobbying group. …

How AIPAC Operates - LewRockwell

“America is a thing you can move very easily.” –Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Tucker Carlson (TC:) So what’s AIPAC? Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY (TM:) AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And they didn’t start out as a PAC in the sense of a political action committee...

www.lewrockwell.com

In a 4 part series FOX News showed that Israel had advanced knowledge of the 09/11 attacks but refused to share the intel and the Israelis celebrated after we were hit.



Secretary of State Madeline Albright refused to take any action against Israel .

Because they own Congress no investigation or punishment will occur. The powers-that-be will again let these bastards get away with murder

That "gossip story" has been repeatedly debunked.

Even the German intel department had sent a list of persons that had been under observation - including some of those who had participated in flight trainings. - Action by the USA? obviously none or simply too late.

 

[DGS49]

So imagine you are rung up on a Zoom call (or whatever), and you have no idea initially what it's about. After listening in for a minute or two, you realize that it is a very important, very confidential conversation that you were manifestly NOT intended to hear.

Do you quickly say, "Hey comrades, you have included me on this call, and I'm not supposed to be hearing this. Maybe you need to take another look at your security protocols."

Alternatively, you surreptitiously listen to the entire conversation and try to make money on it.

What do you think? Who is the dirtbag here?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

That's not what happened at all.

That's EXACTLY what happened.