White House calls judges blocking Trump’s agenda ‘real constitutional crisis’

[80zephyr]

You appeal until the process is final.

The president shouldn't need a "duly appointed USAID officer" to agree for him to do his job.

 

[beagle9]

What the fuck??

"the Court finds that Defendants' actions taken to shut down USAID on an accelerated basis, including its apparent decision to permanently close USAID headquarters without the approval of a duly appointed USAID Officer, likely violated the United States Constitution

It's all just another attempt by the left to interfer with Trumps presidential authorities and actions. No constitutional violations or crisis exist. So where was the crying leftist when their king puppet Biden was allowing the constant violations of our border law's, and turning the border patrol into baby sitters and social worker's ? The hypocrisy is unbelievable.

The quite sitting back of these judge's during the many violations of the Biden administration, uhhh should be an indictment on them, and it should be enough to place them under review, and then to have them immediately impeached if they allowed an invasion to take place upon our southern and northern borders without even the slightest attention given to the constitutional crisis that was taking place.

The judges are actually derelict in their duties to protect the constitution and our borders regardless of who was in the white house at the time.

But now it's Trump trying to straighten it out, so all of a sudden it's a constitutional thing with these judges. I call bull chit big time on this one. The judge is wrong, and if he's being guided by leftist in a compromised way, then it will be found out next.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The president shouldn't need a "duly appointed USAID officer" to agree for him to do his job.

He is not above the law and must follow it.

 

[beagle9]

You appeal until the process is final.

Appeal to what ? A leftist judges alledged rogue biased ruling ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Appeal to what ? A leftist judges alledged rogue biased ruling ?

A super conservative SCOTUS.

 

[beagle9]

He is not above the law and must follow it.

Neither was the judge during the Biden administration, and yet he didn't follow the law in accordance to it being broken constantly before his judicial eye's. Now he wakes up and see's a problem ?

 

[80zephyr]

He is not above the law and must follow it.

Its like the CEO asking for permission to fire the janitor. Stupid.

 

[beagle9]

A super conservative SCOTUS.

You mean a super compromised SCOTUS. They are starting to screw up bad, and I wonder why ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Neither was the judge during the Biden administration, and yet he didn't follow the law in accordance to it being broken constantly before his judicial eye's. Now he wakes up and see's a problem ?

Eileen Cannon. I don't know what to tell you, beagle9.

 

[beagle9]

Eileen Cannon. I don't know what to tell you, beagle9.

You don't know chit, except how to run that Democrat mouth of your's in order to constantly undermine this administration and the American voter's.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You mean a super compromised SCOTUS. They are starting to screw up bad, and I wonder why ?

How compromised? They adjudicate the law. That means they decide, not any executive.

 

[beagle9]

How compromised? They adjudicate the law. That means they decide, not any executive.

Ever since the attacks on the court and it's judges by leftist activist (which was highly illegal I might add), the intimidation caused by such a thing could have easily compromised the court. We aren't sure what damage it may have caused, and that's why it was highly illegal to get away with such a thing, but the Biden administration could have cared less about the law, and that is why we have a leftist activist party running violent protest and making excuses about those protest.

Chuck Shumer should be the first to go to jail, otherwise it is due to the treasonous rhetoric that he has uttered from his lips over time. Adam Shiff possibly next.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Ever since the attacks on the court and it's judges by leftist activist (which was highly illegal I might add), the intimidation caused by such a thing could have easily compromised the court. We aren't sure what damage it may have caused, and that's why it was highly illegal to get away with such a thing, but the Biden administration could have cared less about the law, and that is why we have a leftist activist party running violent protest and making excuses about those protest.

Chuck Shumer should be the first to go to jail, otherwise it is due to the treasonous rhetoric that he has uttered from his lips over time. Adam Shiff possibly next.

Both sides have attacked the court. Neither Shumer nor Shiff have done anything other than point out what a political criminal is our felon in chief.

 

[berg80]

Not a Crisis. An Attack.​

Donald Trump’s administration is now either outright defying judicial orders or, at the very least, making improbable legal arguments for why what they’re doing doesn’t constitute that serious step. It’s part of a serious attack on the Constitution. But I won’t be calling it a Constitutional crisis.

I previously mentioned that I’m not a fan of “Constitutional crisis” as a concept. I’ll link again to Julia’s item (with Seth Masket) in which they grapple with what people mean by “Constitutional crisis”, but I think the bottom line is that a lot of people use the phrase to describe very different things. So why don’t I like it?
A couple of reasons. One is that it’s too passive and neutral. What’s happening now is a sustained, multi-prong attack on the Constitution and the rule of law by Donald Trump and his allies. It didn’t just happen. Nor is there any question about who is responsible for what’s happening overall, even if there are reasonable quibbles over exactly which actions are legitimately contested, which are clear overreach, and which are even worse. We need to say plainly: The president is attacking the Constitutional order.

The other problem I have with “crisis” is that it implies, I think, a single break point on a single dimension. But that is wrong.

Not a Crisis. An Attack.

What's going on.

goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com