White House Already Engaging in Impeachment Inquiry ‘Obstruction’ with Fake ‘No Evidence’ Disinformation Talking Points

[ThisIsMe]

Show one video where she said this what ya can’t cause she never said it

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/03/politics/stacey-abrams-concession-2018-georgia/index.html

 

[ThisIsMe]

The Senate, at the time controlled by Rethugikkkons, said he did in their report!

Oh?

Senate Intelligence Committee finds no collusion between Russia, Trump campaign

Members of President Trump's 2016 campaign were in frequent contact with individuals linked to the Russian government, raising counterintelligence concerns at the time, but there is no evidence they colluded to influence the election, a Senate report revealed Tuesday.

apnews.com

This says they found no collusion.

 

[candycorn]

Yep, for some reason, the left just doesn’t want them to even investigate. Despite several links between hunters business and joe. I say let it all play out. If they come up empty, then there isn’t anything to worry about. The left, however, are keen on not letting it play out.

Meanwhile back in reality, the AG appointed a special prosecutor to look into Hunter Biden.

 

[candycorn]

Oh?

Senate Intelligence Committee finds no collusion between Russia, Trump campaign

Members of President Trump's 2016 campaign were in frequent contact with individuals linked to the Russian government, raising counterintelligence concerns at the time, but there is no evidence they colluded to influence the election, a Senate report revealed Tuesday.

apnews.com

This says they found no collusion.

That is why every Trump campaign official lied about or downplayed their frequent meetings with the Russians, right? Didn’t several end up going to jail for this?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Meanwhile back in reality, the AG appointed a special prosecutor to look into Hunter Biden.

Sure, but you folks are pushing back on it all the way.

 

[ThisIsMe]

That is why every Trump campaign official lied about or downplayed their frequent meetings with the Russians, right? Didn’t several end up going to jail for this?

I’m just citing what the article says, and that is the senate report states that no collusion was found.

Also, i don’t believe anyone was sent to jail for collusion. There were some who were sentenced for other crimes.

 

[candycorn]

Sure, but you folks are pushing back on it all the way.

Wow, you mean the accused is pleading not guilty? Amazing! Oh wait, your blob has plead not guilty too.

So many double standards, so little time.

 

[candycorn]

I’m just citing what the article says, and that is the senate report states that no collusion was found.

Sure. They happen to meet with soviet intel then soviet intel happens to hack the computers of their political opponents. Nothing to see there, right?

Also, i don’t believe anyone was sent to jail for collusion. There were some who were sentenced for other crimes.

Yeah, like lying about meeting with Soviet intel to investigators.

 

[CowboyTed]

There IS no evidence.

When it comes up, let us know.

It's not an Impeachment Inquiry either....

The GOP insisted that to have an inquiry involves a vote of Congress..

 

[ThisIsMe]

Wow, you mean the accused is pleading not guilty? Amazing! Oh wait, your blob has plead not guilty too.

So many double standards, so little time

My post wasn’t directed at hunter, it was directed at the left who pushed back when the investigation into hunter started.

My response was, if he’s innocent, let the investigation play out, all will be fine in the end.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Sure. They happen to meet with soviet intel then soviet intel happens to hack the computers of their political opponents. Nothing to see there, right?

Yeah, like lying about meeting with Soviet intel to investigators.

Sure. They happen to meet with soviet intel then soviet intel happens to hack the computers of their political opponents. Nothing to see there, right?

You cite the senate report as evidence that there was collusion, i point out that the senate report actually says they didn’t find collusion, then you start debunking the senate report. So, is the senate report accurate, or not?

Yeah, like lying about meeting with Soviet intel to investigators

Nobody was sent to jail for that, there were a couple who were sent to jail for lying to congress, but the subject of those lies wasn’t any consideration as to why they received sentencing.

 

[berg80]

What a load of crap. Pointing out there is no evidence of illegal actions taken by Joe isn't obstruction. This is what obstruction looks like.

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers​

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a “ridiculous” subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

“We’re fighting all the subpoenas,” Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. “These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.”

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers (Published 2019)

The president dismissed oversight investigations by House Democrats as partisan and illegitimate, signaling a new phase of confrontation.

www.nytimes.com

Congressional effort grows to strip funding from special counsel's Trump prosecutions​

Congressional effort grows to strip funding from special counsel's Trump prosecutions

House Republicans are trying to prohibit the use of federal money to pay for special counsel Jack Smith's investigation and criminal cases against Trump.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

You cite the senate report as evidence that there was collusion, i point out that the senate report actually says they didn’t find collusion, then you start debunking the senate report. So, is the senate report accurate, or not?



Nobody was sent to jail for that, there were a couple who were sent to jail for lying to congress, but the subject of those lies wasn’t any consideration as to why they received sentencing.

The word Collusion is a mistake. The Senate committee said that there was interference. That was the word used.

 

[hadit]

democrats have never questioned the election results or the motives of our public servants scientists et cetera et cetera. Everything you know politically is absolutely wrong and total B S hateful anti-American garbage.... The GOP is a total disgrace now....

Dude, you're flailing. democrats most CERTAINLY have not only questioned the results of an election, they have outright denied them. Take some Maalox and a nap. Oh, and you're forgetting to mention Murdoch again.

And why won't you just come out and admit that democrats are totally useless as long as even one Republican is around who might look at them sideways?

 

[berg80]

democrats most CERTAINLY have not only questioned the results of an election

Nothing any Dem has ever said about the outcome of an election, including Hillary's complaint after learning about the extent of Russia's "sweeping and systematic" interference in Trump's favor as well as Trump's eager acceptance of it, comes within a million miles of the Big Lie and the adoption of its baseless premise by roughly half of Repubs.

 

[hadit]

Nothing any Dem has ever said about the outcome of an election, including Hillary's complaint after learning about the extent of Russia's "sweeping and systematic" interference in Trump's favor as well as Trump's eager acceptance of it, comes within a million miles of the Big Lie and the adoption of its baseless premise by roughly half of Repubs.

That's not what he was saying, so irrelevant.

 

[berg80]

That's not what he was saying, so irrelevant.

My post was in response to what YOU said, so not irrelevant.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The word Collusion is a mistake. The Senate committee said that there was interference. That was the word used.

Yes, there was Russian interference, but there wasn’t trump collusion, according to the report.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Yes, there was Russian interference, but there wasn’t trump collusion, according to the report.

Right, but as I posted before, with video, Trump did ask Russia during his camping to find Hilary s 30,000 emails . And Russia obliged the next day. THAT, is collusion, it is total interference by a foreign country in another country s elections.

 

[CowboyTed]

My post wasn’t directed at hunter, it was directed at the left who pushed back when the investigation into hunter started.

My response was, if he’s innocent, let the investigation play out, all will be fine in the end.

Investigation has been going on 5 years now...

5 years and all they got so far was paying taxes late and lying on a gun form.

How long are you allowed to investigate a private individual before it come harassment...

The DOJ is not meant to investigate people but investigate crimes...

Look what the Sepcial Council instructions are:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Appointment_of_David_C._Weiss_as_Special_Counsel.pdf

I.e. investigate a person