White European Colonizers

I agree that these are all genocides, and they involve a greater number killed than what Israel is doing in Gaza.

A couple of points here:

1. The definition of genocide is not contingent on how many people are killed, it is determined by intent. Specifically, it is any of a set of crimes carried out with the intent to destroy in whole or in part a religious or ethnic group. Israel has committed the crimes, the question is merely one of establishing intent. I think there are statements made by some Israeli politicians that could indicate that intent, but will not belabor the point. Crimes against humanity are crimes against humanity regardless of intent.
2. The reason you hear more about the Israel/Palestine conflict than those others is because A) there is near universal agreement in the Western world that those other genocides are atrocities, so the issue os not contentious, and B) the US government is not backing any of the groups carrying out those genocides, so there is little for people in the US to protest.
Thank you again.

1. Killing innocents, babies is fine if Jews are not involved?

That's textbook anti-Semitism;



2. If an Arab nation had been subjected to an Oct7 massacre, what do you imagine the result would have been.......3% loss of life, or more?
 
Sure Polichica. Whatever you say sweetheart.
I always be...longing to be able to cut and paste shit I haven't even bothered to read myself. :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
And I have reduced another dolt to reach for vulgarity.

Government schooling doesn't make them articulate.
 
Thank you again.

1. Killing innocents, babies is fine if Jews are not involved?

That's textbook anti-Semitism;



2. If an Arab nation had been subjected to an Oct7 massacre, what do you imagine the result would have been.......3% loss of life, or more?
1. I cannot fathom how you extracted that from my first point. Please expand on how you managed that interpretation of my words.
2. Probably more, but this is irrelevant. Saying, "some other country might hypothetically act worse" is not a valid defense of a country committing crimes against humanity.
 
And I have reduced another dolt to reach for vulgarity.

Government schooling doesn't make them articulate.
Do you actually TRY to wind up really not saying anything with your posts or is that accidental?
Either way...sucks to be you huh?
 
"...in the three years since the horrific Oct. 7 massacre of Israelis, we have watched in astonishment as the most absurd and outrageous allegations against Israel have wormed their way into Western print. We have been subjected to unbelievable and sometimes obviously false claims, parroted verbatim by journalists who are either the world’s most gullible or its most immoral people — or both."
You believe 10/7 was horrific but Israel’s actions since, you consider admirable. You don’t know how psychopathic that is.

Is she one of your heroes?
 
Can you define Zionism so everyone can see how incompatible it is?
Do I need to explain the meaning of this to you?
1779481828803.webp
 
Oh, but it’s much much worse. You can’t totally destroy a tiny geographical area full of people the way Israel did, and only kill the official stated number. It’s nonsensical.

Can you answer this question I’ve asked many here since the genocide began, you included…if if if Israel has murdered over 500,000 Palestinians since 10/7, half of them children, do you drop your support for it?
No because Israel has been defending itself from Muslim aggression and terror attacks since before it existed. Israel is fighting a war, civilians get killed in wars.
 
No because Israel has been defending itself from Muslim aggression and terror attacks since before it existed. Israel is fighting a war, civilians get killed in wars.
Lol. Israel is the aggressor but you prefer living a lie, so as to justify the mass murder Israel is committing.
 
1. I cannot fathom how you extracted that from my first point. Please expand on how you managed that interpretation of my words.
2. Probably more, but this is irrelevant. Saying, "some other country might hypothetically act worse" is not a valid defense of a country committing crimes against humanity.
1 You somehow include the Israeli response to a massacre in a discussion of genocide
2 You imply some such intent.

It would provide succor for the anti-Israel propagandists
 
You believe 10/7 was horrific but Israel’s actions since, you consider admirable. You don’t know how psychopathic that is.

Is she one of your heroes?

"....the world’s most gullible or its most immoral people — or both."

And you would be which?
 
You said zionism is incompatible with civilization................

Can you define Zionism so everyone can see how incompatible it is?
Wake up! Stop pushing Islamaphobia and recognize the real problem.
 
15th post
Wake up! Stop pushing Islamaphobia and recognize the real problem.

It seems we've established that your posts write checks that your knowledge can't cash: you still can't define the word you live to use:

You said zionism is incompatible with civilization................

Can you define Zionism so everyone can see how incompatible it is?
 
It seems we've established that your posts write checks that your knowledge can't cash: you still can't define the word you live to use:

You said zionism is incompatible with civilization................

Can you define Zionism so everyone can see how incompatible it

1779490687386.webp
 
It seems we've established that your posts write checks that your knowledge can't cash: you still can't define the word you live to use:

You said zionism is incompatible with civilization................

Can you define Zionism so everyone can see how incompatible it is?
If only you could get informed.
1779490847058.webp
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom