Whistle Blower Outted -- It is a Brennen era operative....

[bripat9643]

A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...

The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...

These people are brazen and criminals!

I've also read that this guy is tied in with Hillary Clinton. And Schumer. Can anyone verify?

he's not

and it doesn't even matter... that's just obfuscation via mudslinging

all that matters is if the complaint is credible or not

and the IG's office investigated the validity of the complaint and the IG found it both credible and Urgent

and then Trump's several TV confessions of committing the wrong doings

The IG is wrong. The IG didn't even bother to compare the complaint with the text of the phone call.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.

• “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
• You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
• You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.

Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”

Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.

he likely monetized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.

Allegedly, after the UK tried to prosecute them years earlier and Shokin, the corrupt prosecutor would not help them... Burisma tried to clean up their act, and hired a bunch of well known names, for good appearance...

still had nothing to do with Joe Biden's comments about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired.

He didn't monetize his name. He monetized his father's political pull, which means he monetized the federal government.

 

[bripat9643]

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

carrying out USA policy is a crime now?? I didn't know that

That's exactly what you are accusing Trump of, moron, carrying out government policy.

 

[bripat9643]

The WB went through all the required legal steps . That’s not leaking stupid

This not a valid whistleblower complaint.
This person either was solicited or contacted Adam Schiff-face early on. That removes any validation to the claim. Nevermind the fact that most of the claims proved to be manufactured with a malicious political bias.

This person either was solicited or contacted Adam Schiff-face early on.
Whistleblower contacted STAFF of the House Intelligence Committee, and they told him to go to the IC IG and get an attorney. Them's the rules. He did not talk to Schiff. Schiff did know the complaint was in the works, though, because of that initial contact with the committee.
Whistleblower spoke to Schiff aides before filing complaint

the claims proved to be manufactured with a malicious political bias.
Well, since they were reporting Trump for doing something highly irregular, I guess you could say there was a "bias" there, but a "malicious political bias?" No.

Bullshit. Schiff knew about this complaint before anyone else. If his staff knew, Schiff knew.
Schiff-face has been caught a couple of times taking calls from people with dirt on Trump. We have him on tape taking a call from a couple of Russian comedians who claimed to have naked pictures of Trump. Schiff knows about this shit and simply turns it over to his staff to work out the details. The Times gave him 4 Pinocchios for his lie that he was never contacted by the whistleblower....when evidence was produced that he knew about it over 6 weeks ago.

If doing it is a crime, then trying to do it is also a crime. Shouldn't Schiff be under indictment?

 

[rjs330]

I would like to ask a favor THOUGH

"though" is the word that does him in. It demonstrates quid pro quo.

Pure speculation and subjectivism.

Suuure, uh-huh. Words actually do have meaning, even if you don't know what that meaning is...

though means but, however, nevertheless or in spite of.

Still pure speculation. Speculation will not hold up in any legal proceedings.

 

[Zorro!]

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.

• “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
• You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
• You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.

Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”

Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.

he likely monetized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.

Allegedly, after the UK tried to prosecute them years earlier and Shokin, the corrupt prosecutor would not help them... Burisma tried to clean up their act, and hired a bunch of well known names, for good appearance...

still had nothing to do with Joe Biden's comments about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired.

He didn't monetize his name. He monetized his father's political pull, which means he monetized the federal government.

Biden brings the US taxpayer money, they fill his coke addled son's pockets $Millions and $Billions.

 

[rjs330]

We have a transcript to back it up, and all you have is sleazy lying Schiff for Brains. The idea that it's illegal for the federal government to prosecute corrupt politicians just because they happen to be running for office doesn't pass the laugh test.

You have a transcript where Trump solicits the Urkainian president to open an investigation into Trumps chief political rival. Where Trump explicitly connects additional US aid.....to doing this favor for Trump.

Zelensky: ...we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.

President: I would like you to do us a favor though...

Yup. First line on page 3.

What line and what page is Biden brought up?

Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document

a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.

our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!

justice is suppose to be blind

HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

Yes if Trump said "You're not Etting a billion dollars from the US government unless you do x that benefits me or my kid personally"

 

[Zorro!]

I would like to ask a favor THOUGH

"though" is the word that does him in. It demonstrates quid pro quo.

Pure speculation and subjectivism.

Suuure, uh-huh. Words actually do have meaning, even if you don't know what that meaning is...

though means but, however, nevertheless or in spite of.

Still pure speculation. Speculation will not hold up in any legal proceedings.

Oh yes, they are mind readers, and they can delete 500 words from the transcript in order to put "Biden" next to "Favor" impute meanings that neither President stated or understood and overturn the 2016 election.

What a collection of thunderous dunces run today's Democrat Party. They think they can make up crap and that if the Democrats in the Fake News Media go along with it, that it's a consensus!

 

[rjs330]

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

You didn't what? Call it bribery? Fail to show what Biden got out of it?

What he said on video was not a crime. It's not a crime for the U.S. to give another country money with strings attached for them to make internal changes.

And it's no crime for the president to request that another nation "to look into" possible corruption that occurred in that nation. Especially when there is a treaty to do so.

 

[Zorro!]

You have a transcript where Trump solicits the Urkainian president to open an investigation into Trumps chief political rival. Where Trump explicitly connects additional US aid.....to doing this favor for Trump.

Zelensky: ...we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.

President: I would like you to do us a favor though...

Yup. First line on page 3.

What line and what page is Biden brought up?

Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document

a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.

our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!

justice is suppose to be blind

HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

Yes if Trump said "You're not Etting a billion dollars from the US government unless you do x"

Quid Pro Joe!

 

[Zorro!]

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

You didn't what? Call it bribery? Fail to show what Biden got out of it?

What he said on video was not a crime. It's not a crime for the U.S. to give another country money with strings attached for them to make internal changes.

And it's no crime for the president to request that another nation "to look into" possible corruption that occurred in that nation. Especially when there is a treaty to do so.

Damn Straight, and with all the US Aid involved, it's his Constitutional Duty.

 

[Leo123]

The whistleblower is a TDSer.....

"The unnamed whistleblower whose complaint about President Donald Trump's July 25 call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was not just a CIA agent in the Obama administration, but a member of the team investigating candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 election, according to Paul Sperry, a media fellow at the Hoover Institution and a former D.C. bureau chief for Investors Business Daily. Ironically, the whistleblower dug up dirt on Trump from — drumroll, please — Ukraine!

Furthermore, the whistleblower may have a grudge against Trump, because according to Sperry, he or she lost a job when Trump became president.

If this report is true, it seriously undermines the Democrats' narrative of a public servant just doing his or her duty by reporting untoward — nay, impeachable! — actions taken by the president. If the whistleblower is guilty of exactly the thing Democrats are accusing Trump of doing, this house of cards impeachment may collapse."

Report: Ex-CIA Impeachment Whistleblower Dug Up Dirt on Trump in Ukraine

 

[Zorro!]

The whistleblower is a TDSer.....

"The unnamed whistleblower whose complaint about President Donald Trump's July 25 call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was not just a CIA agent in the Obama administration, but a member of the team investigating candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 election, according to Paul Sperry, a media fellow at the Hoover Institution and a former D.C. bureau chief for Investors Business Daily. Ironically, the whistleblower dug up dirt on Trump from — drumroll, please — Ukraine!

Furthermore, the whistleblower may have a grudge against Trump, because according to Sperry, he or she lost a job when Trump became president.

If this report is true, it seriously undermines the Democrats' narrative of a public servant just doing his or her duty by reporting untoward — nay, impeachable! — actions taken by the president. If the whistleblower is guilty of exactly the thing Democrats are accusing Trump of doing, this house of cards impeachment may collapse."

Report: Ex-CIA Impeachment Whistleblower Dug Up Dirt on Trump in Ukraine

The Walls Are Closing In On These Lawless Creeps!

 

[mudwhistle]

The WB went through all the required legal steps . That’s not leaking stupid

This not a valid whistleblower complaint.
This person either was solicited or contacted Adam Schiff-face early on. That removes any validation to the claim. Nevermind the fact that most of the claims proved to be manufactured with a malicious political bias.

This person either was solicited or contacted Adam Schiff-face early on.
Whistleblower contacted STAFF of the House Intelligence Committee, and they told him to go to the IC IG and get an attorney. Them's the rules. He did not talk to Schiff. Schiff did know the complaint was in the works, though, because of that initial contact with the committee.
Whistleblower spoke to Schiff aides before filing complaint

the claims proved to be manufactured with a malicious political bias.
Well, since they were reporting Trump for doing something highly irregular, I guess you could say there was a "bias" there, but a "malicious political bias?" No.

Bullshit. Schiff knew about this complaint before anyone else. If his staff knew, Schiff knew.
Schiff-face has been caught a couple of times taking calls from people with dirt on Trump. We have him on tape taking a call from a couple of Russian comedians who claimed to have naked pictures of Trump. Schiff knows about this shit and simply turns it over to his staff to work out the details. The Times gave him 4 Pinocchios for his lie that he was never contacted by the whistleblower....when evidence was produced that he knew about it over 6 weeks ago.

If doing it is a crime, then trying to do it is also a crime. Shouldn't Schiff be under indictment?

Only if he knew it was a fraud.
This whistleblower incident is fraud, and Adam Schiff-face knows it.

 

[Faun]

This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.

Also, your post has no link.

There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!

they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....

their OATH is not to a mere man...

There is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.

The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .

They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.

Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcript

and it is clear as day, he was doing precisely what the whistleblower claimed....

And now we have the emails of the ambassadors and diplomats and state dept.... all verifying the whistleblower complaint.

It does no such thing.

SHOCKER:

So what? The whistleblower's complaint was verified by trump's phone call.

 

[Faun]

a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.

our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!

justice is suppose to be blind

HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

Yup. Biden's son was never the subject of *any* investigation or prosecution.

Again, this is the stupidest ******* conspiracy in recent memory. This is literally the conspiracy that they're working with:

That Joe Biden forced Ukraine to get rid of a prosecutor that was neither investigator nor prosecuting his son for any crime whatsoever.

Which is the stupidest ******* thing I've ever heard. Yet they repeat it without question.

You can't fix stupid.

They're chasing conspiracies because they're following their leader who is himself a conspiracy nut like the Truthers and Birthers we have here.

 

[Lesh]

There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!

they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....

their OATH is not to a mere man...

There is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.

The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .

They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.

Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcript

and it is clear as day, he was doing precisely what the whistleblower claimed....

And now we have the emails of the ambassadors and diplomats and state dept.... all verifying the whistleblower complaint.

It does no such thing.

SHOCKER:

So what? The whistleblower's complaint was verified by trump's phone call.

Trumpers are lost in bullshit. The phone call memo and Trump’s “ask” of CHINA say it had merit

 

[edward37]

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.

carrying out USA policy is a crime now?? I didn't know that

That's exactly what you are accusing Trump of, moron, carrying out government policy.

He's being accused of asking foreign govt's to help him win an election by digging up dirt on Bidens The moron says he's for rooting out corruption Well then 2 things,,, When did he ask those 3 gov'ts for help rooting out a non political person and why can't he start with himself?? A man with no ethics.....a man who bashes anyone disagreeing with him A man who would be king

 

[Faun]

We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.

Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?

For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.

You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.

Yup. Biden's son was never the subject of *any* investigation or prosecution.

Again, this is the stupidest ******* conspiracy in recent memory. This is literally the conspiracy that they're working with:

That Joe Biden forced Ukraine to get rid of a prosecutor that was neither investigator nor prosecuting his son for any crime whatsoever.

Which is the stupidest ******* thing I've ever heard. Yet they repeat it without question.

You can't fix stupid.

Oh sure, the Ukrainians just happy to love funneling millions of dollars to the Vice Presiden'ts coke addled son while the VP controls US money flowing to Ukraine. The prosecutor that got fired says he absolutely was investigating Hunter Biden's corrupt arrangement trading on his father's influence.

"The prosecutor that got fired says he absolutely was investigating Hunter Biden's corrupt arrangement trading on his father's influence."

That's what he says now. And of course, he has an axe to grind for Biden who got him fired.

But even worse than his motive... YOU recently posted where he claimed he didn't have an investigation open but that he was "planning" on opening an investigation when he was fired.

Shokin told The Hill, in written answers to questions that, before he was fired as general prosecutor, he had made “specific plans” for the investigation that “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”

... that's my emphasis added to show YOU posted both Shokin saying he was planning to investigate AND Shokin saying hd was investigating. Both cannot be true yet YOU posted both as though they are.

 

[Zorro!]

that was investigated this May 2019 and the Ukrainians found hunter and his pay, broke none of their laws

I feel bad for the Ukranian President, who is going to piss off Trump if he doesn't dig up dirt on Biden, but who probably doesn't want to be seen as Trump's ***** either.
Considering that the investigation has already been done and an answer given, it puts the guy in a pretty tough spot. Trump will definitely shut off aid to Ukraine if he's pissed.

yes he's in a real pickle, and this is why trump's cancerous intimidation of foreign nations for his own personal political benefit has to be removed

I give it.....two weeks? Before Trumpies are arguing that Trump had an obligation as president to pressure the Ukrainian president into investigating Biden as part of his 'duty to root out corruption'.

Nope.
Apparently they're doing it on their own.

Sorry.....try again

Trump is already laying the groundwork for the rhetorical retreat, saying he had a 'duty to root out corruption'.

He does have a duty to root out corruption, why do you favor corruption?

Steven Hayes posts a tweetstorm declaring Bad Orange Man is Bad, but concedes that "the Hunter Biden sinecure with Bursima is gross"