Since reading comprehension is apparently NOT a strong suit of yours, you will notice that in the rest of my information, I referred to Carter's systematic dismantling of the Department of Defense (prior to the embassy seizure) and the inability of units to respond to a situation such as the embassy take over, even if he wanted them to respond.
If you are going to make asinine statements, you need to back them up with proof.
And that's Carter's fault? The Turks were in turmoil, about to launch a coup.
Which bases in the ME did Carter close? And which bills to defund the DoD did Carter sign? Be specific, poseur.
And why didn't you answer my question, Mr. Reading Comprehension?
Military readiness is the responsibility of the Pentagon and the unit commanders. Period.
And experts? How much credence do wingnuts like you give to experts like Paul Krugman, who is being proven correct with each passing day? How about
expert weapons inspectors like Hans Blix?
Then the military really fucked up, didn't they? Or was Carter supposed to disregard their advice, because he was supposed to know more about helicopter capability than they did?
Who de-constituted it in the first place? Link?
You know, you can disagree all you like... if you have the facts to back up your position. You do understand what facts are? Oh, obviously not...
Oh, I understand facts, alright. Provide some, with the proof to back them up.