Why? Because I dared to disagree with you or for pointing out a fact?
You pointed out no facts, only an unsupported opinion that "negro's anger" is to blame for this situation.
You mean they are not angry...and never were?
Of course they are angry and with good reason, the police and courts were using them as a cash source and were not being held accountable for their wrongdoings. There are cities all around the country that have similar racial populations and somehow manage to not have that much strife, the difference is in the Ferguson police and their ill-conceived policies and practices.
So you feel that Michael Brown acted like a thug and pushed the store clerk out of the way as he walked out of the store because he was angry at how the police treat the people of his town?
You believe that the anger those looters had for the way the police treated them was what prompted them to steal from their neighbors and burn down buildings owned and occupied by their neighbors?
A short time ago, a group of black teenage girls in Brooklyn, NY who belonged to some known gang beat the crap out of one girl in a McDonalds. The crowd there just watched and filmed it, but no one helped. Is that because they are angry at how they are treated by the police in NY?
Did it ever occur to you that because of the actions of many in the community, the Furgeson Police felt the safest way to keep the peace was to stop ANYONE that was breaking the law, no matter how minor the law was?
Curious...do you feel Michael Brown was wronged that day?