Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[Tuatara]

Read the OP again, idiot. It doesn't mention God or creation. Does it? Now, shut your yap.

The OP is asking for evidence of evolution. It has been presented numerous times here. The deniers have no conception of science and rely on "creationist" sites for their rebuttals. Please actually debate the actual content provided to you. If you cannot, wave the white flag and leave with dignity and hope your grandchildren will never read what you have posted here..

here is the weird thing: people like you keep responding

And you are responding to me, and you keep responding in the thread. Who knew people would do that in a public forum. That's weird.

 

[cnm]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

 

[S.J.]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

It would have been a favor to us if you had.

I'm sure it would have. Then you wouldn't have to provide any evidence.

 

[Mr.Right]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

 

[cnm]

I've always wondered. If evolution is a fact, why did people fabricate phony evidence to support it?

I guess that's like splinters of the true cross and the Shroud of Turin, people enjoy practical jokes.

 

[Tuatara]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

What is your interpretation of fossils? This ought to be good.

 

[cnm]

because they wanted to bait wingnutty religious nitwits?

I hope you're not saying that like it's a bad thing...

 

[Mr.Right]

I've always wondered. If evolution is a fact, why did people fabricate phony evidence to support it?

I guess that's like splinters of the true cross and the Shroud of Turin, people enjoy practical jokes.

More deflection.

 

[cnm]

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

Well, invincible ignorance is invincible, I think I've already admitted that.

But still, it's not like evidence being evidence there is no evidence is a new trope of the batshit crazies.

 

[Mr.Right]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

What is your interpretation of fossils? This ought to be good.

Why should I bother telling you? You'll simply dismiss it. Won't you?

 

[orogenicman]

At least there is historical evidence for the existence of Jesus. What does evolution have? A bunch of guesswork. That's it.

Show us your historical evidence that YHWH done it, that's what we've been asking. I mean it was all here when Jesus was supposed to have been here.

Creationism isn't on trial here. Evolution is. Quit deflecting.

Erm, what trial, where? Scopes is over. Dover is over, and you folks lost.

argument by comic video? genius, you should run for Dog catcher

Their arguments are only worth laughter, dude. Take Ken Ham (please) for instance. Now there is a nutcase if there is one. Like Lewis Black said, those people apparently believe that the Flintstones is a documentary! Batshit crazy, I tell ya.

 

[cnm]

More deflection.

You don't enjoy practical jokes? Where's your sense of humour?

 

[orogenicman]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

What is your interpretation of fossils? This ought to be good.

Why should I bother telling you? You'll simply dismiss it. Won't you?

We can't dismiss it if we don't know what your interpretation is. Oh wait, I almost forgot. You are ignoring my posts. Loser.

 

[cnm]

Why should I bother telling you? You'll simply dismiss it. Won't you?

Try not to let your lip quiver so much.

 

[orogenicman]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

It would have been a favor to us if you had.

I'm sure it would have. Then you wouldn't have to provide any evidence.

I would still be a geologist regardless.

 

[eots]

the best knowledge available on an infinite universe and its purpose and nature is limited to say the least

It is still the best knowledge available until better knowledge replaces it.

or until Jesus or the aliens return to smote our asses..who ever gets here first

 

[S.J.]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

It would have been a favor to us if you had.

I'm sure it would have. Then you wouldn't have to provide any evidence.

I would still be a geologist regardless.

But you still wouldn't be able to provide any evidence, just like you can't provide any now.

 

[Mr.Right]

Why should I bother telling you? You'll simply dismiss it. Won't you?

Try not to let your lip quiver so much.

Well, look at you. Trying to be clever, and failing badly. Ain't that cute? Run along now, so the adults can continue this discussion.

 

[Tuatara]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

How come you ignore the proven fact of fossil existence as fitting the one piece of hard evidence requested in the OP?

Because it doesn't. The only fact is their existence. We simply don't agree with their interpretation of that fact.

What is your interpretation of fossils? This ought to be good.

Why should I bother telling you? You'll simply dismiss it. Won't you?

So you can't even back up your own argument let alone provide your own argument. Why are you even here?

 

[orogenicman]

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence. Glad I didn't hold my breath.

It would have been a favor to us if you had.

I'm sure it would have. Then you wouldn't have to provide any evidence.

I would still be a geologist regardless.

But you still wouldn't be able to provide any evidence, just like you can't provide any now.

Denial is not a river in Eqypt, yet you people are willfully ignorant about science. I can't be kind about this, because you people believe in talking snakes, for Pete's sake.