False. Why do rely on lying so much?
Itâs sad.
Try to follow along, shitbag. Note: I donât say or claim that Potato hadnât signed it. I simply noted that the signature is different. It
clearly is.
Your denial puts you in a laughable position. It makes you a confirmed hack moron since the âBâ in his letter announcing the end of his campaign is:
View attachment 982868
Clearly not akin to any of the âBâsâ in other exemplars of his signature:
View attachment 982872
As I Already posted.
Now letâs get a bit more specific for your petty little dishonest mind:
1. The diagonal slash is his version of a âJâ in both instances. So far, so good.
2. The âRâ instead of its usual size (being more or less the same as the âBâ) is miniaturized in the suspect version.
3. Why is there suddenly an underscore in the suspect version but not in the prior exemplars?
4.(a) The capital âBâ in the suspect version has a
few dissimilarities. The upstroke on the B is not connected to the body of the âBâ in the suspect version. But it is in the other exemplars.
4.(b). There is a little swirl at the top and left and side of the swirling âbâ curves in the suspect version; but because it is
connected to the down(?) stroke of the stem of the âBâ in the other exemplars, there is no such swirl on the exemplars.
4.(c) There is a disconnect between the âBâ and the ensuing letter âiâ in the suspect version but not in the exemplars.
5. In the suspect version, the name âBidenâ ends with what looks like a sloppy âs.â It
isnât present in the exemplars.
6. Why no âJr.â in the suspect version? Itâs
present in the exemplars.
Shitbag: you can waffle and twiddle all you wish. But you canât convincingly address any of the differences much less all of them.