False. Why do rely on lying so much?
Itās sad.
Try to follow along, shitbag. Note: I donāt say or claim that Potato hadnāt signed it. I simply noted that the signature is different. It
clearly is.
Your denial puts you in a laughable position. It makes you a confirmed hack moron since the āBā in his letter announcing the end of his campaign is:
View attachment 982868
Clearly not akin to any of the āBāsā in other exemplars of his signature:
View attachment 982872
As I Already posted.
Now letās get a bit more specific for your petty little dishonest mind:
1. The diagonal slash is his version of a āJā in both instances. So far, so good.
2. The āRā instead of its usual size (being more or less the same as the āBā) is miniaturized in the suspect version.
3. Why is there suddenly an underscore in the suspect version but not in the prior exemplars?
4.(a) The capital āBā in the suspect version has a
few dissimilarities. The upstroke on the B is not connected to the body of the āBā in the suspect version. But it is in the other exemplars.
4.(b). There is a little swirl at the top and left and side of the swirling ābā curves in the suspect version; but because it is
connected to the down(?) stroke of the stem of the āBā in the other exemplars, there is no such swirl on the exemplars.
4.(c) There is a disconnect between the āBā and the ensuing letter āiā in the suspect version but not in the exemplars.
5. In the suspect version, the name āBidenā ends with what looks like a sloppy ās.ā It
isnāt present in the exemplars.
6. Why no āJr.ā in the suspect version? Itās
present in the exemplars.
Shitbag: you can waffle and twiddle all you wish. But you canāt convincingly address any of the differences much less all of them.