- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,805
- 21,316
- 2,488
No, it is not, unless you are photoshopping again. That's defamatory and can be hit with big fines.It's on camera.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it is not, unless you are photoshopping again. That's defamatory and can be hit with big fines.It's on camera.
It's on vid. Quite available. But keep ignoring it.No, it is not, unless you are photoshopping again. That's defamatory and can be hit with big fines.
Nope.Because she is one. Ever see her college pics?
Amazing this left wing Mossad W lover always "knows" before we do...
I see you don't understand the idea of burden of proof. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. I made no claim that the evidence was forged. You, on the other hand, made the positive claim that the evidence is real. You made the positive claim, so the burden is on you. I'm merely pointing out how the evidence could be faked. Quite easily too.Says you. Prove that the signature is fake.
The burden of proof that its fake is entirely on you, tinfoil.
Prove its a deep fake.
The burden of proof that its fake is entirely on you, tinfoil.
Prove Harris is lying about Joe Biden dropping out.
The burden of proof that she's lying is entirely on you, tinfoil.
Random conspiracies backed by jackshit may be evidence on Truth Social. But off that festering conspiracy shithole, your imagination means nothing.
Show us the evidence its all faked.
I see you don't understand the idea of burden of proof. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. I made no claim that the evidence was forged. You, on the other hand, made the positive claim that the evidence is real. You made the positive claim, so the burden is on you. I'm merely pointing out how the evidence could be faked. Quite easily too.
The signature doesn’t resemble his other signatures. That does constitute evidence although it may not qualify as “proof.”So...you've got no evidence that the signature was forged, no evidence that the call was faked, zero evidence that Harris lying, and nothing that Biden's office is lying.
Well that was easy.
The signature doesn’t resemble his other signatures.
That does constitute evidence although it may not qualify as “proof.”
I didn't claim they were. You claimed they were real, but have provided no evidence.So...you've got no evidence that the signature was forged, no evidence that the call was faked, zero evidence that Harris lying, and nothing that Biden's office is lying.
Well that was easy.
Observation. Even a complete dumbass such as you can see the difference. Of course, that would require that you have eyesight and honesty. So that’s probably a non starter.Says who?
he's getting his big boy pants washed.The guy hasn't been seen in a week. He stops his campaign at the last hour with a post on Twitter? WTF? Where is the Big Guy?
here you goThe guy hasn't been seen in a week. He stops his campaign at the last hour with a post on Twitter? WTF? Where is the Big Guy?
Observation.
You’re beyond weak.So you citing you.The only major difference is the underline.
This thread will not age well.
But tell us again how Biden calling and discussing his dropping out, how a signed letter, how confirmation from his office, how confirmation from the VP.....isn't evidence.
Just be prepared for more pointing and laughing. As the only one pushing this dipshit conspiracy....are the dipshits.