Where does the constitution give Congress power to set up national health care?

[Snookie]

The judiciary tries cases. They are not supposed to write or repeal laws. That's what the legislature does, you idiot.

Idiot, the supreme court reviews cases. They do not try cases, Flea Bailey.

Hey stupid. As you can see above, i said "judiciary". I did not say "supreme court".

the supreme court is a judiciary, pumpkin head. Judiciary - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

 

[itfitzme]

the constitution provides for the supreme court to decide on constitutional questions

thats the law

the supreme court ruled obama care did not violate the constitution

failing to agree with the high court is treason

In Marbury v. Madison, the SCROTUS arbitrarily interpreted the Constitution as giving it the right to interpret the Constitution. This logical fallacy enabled a power play by the last of the Federalists, who had always wanted to establish an oligarchy of the economic elite but had been voted out of legislative existence by the American people because of the high-handed ways of Hamilton and Adams. If judicial review had been in the Constitution, the Court would have been exercising its tyranny over legislation from the very beginning instead of waiting 12 years to usurp power. I agree with publicly financed health services, but it is dangerous to our freedom to praise the SCROTUS for anything it does. It is an anti-democratic tribunal and must be stripped of its self-granted power to veto laws passed by the people or the people's elected representatives.

Nope, I'm not seeing it.

Article III | U.S. Constitution | LII / Legal Information Institute

Article III simply specifies a supreme court, that it has judiciary powers, and the extent of those judiciary powers.

If, in fact, the Supreme Courts judiciary powers is to interpret the law, then it is logically consistent that it has the judiciary power to interpret the Constitution.

Law can be written with such specificity as to make no interpretation possible. They aren't.

 

[RKMBrown]

Works great if you are rich.

What about the poor? Let em die?

The poor have medicaid. Why do you keep repeating this lie?

40 milo lacko

Why you ignorant slut. Everybody who can not afford health care can get medicaid.

You must be below the poverty level. Most working people who are above thepoverty level can not afford the rip off premiums of the health care monopolies.

"The main requirement of Medicaid eligibility is determining that a low income situation exists in the home. Currently, the requirement states that the family’s income must be below the poverty level. The number of people living in the household is taken into consideration, and all forms of income are counted, including child and spousal support. In 2014, some states will increase their financial Medicaid eligibility requirements to 133% of the poverty level. Therefore, many people who did not previously qualify for Medicaid will find themselves eligible at that time."

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

 

[RKMBrown]

While I would agree there are a few liberal courts that are a mess, I would not accuse the entire court system. Appeals appear to work pretty well in cases where the courts have ruled wrongly. Trust but verify is a good way to live.

No the entire federal court system is stuffed full of politically appointed hacks. Its a worthless mess. Remember this is the court that ruled in the KELO case that government could take private property to benefit private developers.

The court basically said that the unaffordable CareAct passed thru Congress on a lie. Legislation based on lies violates the principles of a Democracy/Republic.

a lie according to an insignificant pissant like you counts for zero. now back to your cave.

Lord help me, I agree with snook on something...

 

[dcraelin]

"No the entire federal court system is stuffed full of politically appointed hacks. Its a worthless mess. Remember this is the court that ruled in the KELO case that government could take private property to benefit private developers.

The court basically said that the unaffordable CareAct passed thru Congress on a lie. Legislation based on lies violates the principles of a Democracy/Republic" dcraelin

 

[Snookie]

The poor have medicaid. Why do you keep repeating this lie?

40 milo lacko

Why you ignorant slut. Everybody who can not afford health care can get medicaid.

You must be below the poverty level. Most working people who are above thepoverty level can not afford the rip off premiums of the health care monopolies.

"The main requirement of Medicaid eligibility is determining that a low income situation exists in the home. Currently, the requirement states that the family’s income must be below the poverty level. The number of people living in the household is taken into consideration, and all forms of income are counted, including child and spousal support. In 2014, some states will increase their financial Medicaid eligibility requirements to 133% of the poverty level. Therefore, many people who did not previously qualify for Medicaid will find themselves eligible at that time."

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

no it;s equality.

 

[kaz]

40 milo lacko

Why you ignorant slut. Everybody who can not afford health care can get medicaid.

You must be below the poverty level. Most working people who are above thepoverty level can not afford the rip off premiums of the health care monopolies.

"The main requirement of Medicaid eligibility is determining that a low income situation exists in the home. Currently, the requirement states that the family’s income must be below the poverty level. The number of people living in the household is taken into consideration, and all forms of income are counted, including child and spousal support. In 2014, some states will increase their financial Medicaid eligibility requirements to 133% of the poverty level. Therefore, many people who did not previously qualify for Medicaid will find themselves eligible at that time."

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

no it;s equality.

Equality of opportunity and equality of results are entirely different things

 

[RKMBrown]

40 milo lacko

Why you ignorant slut. Everybody who can not afford health care can get medicaid.

You must be below the poverty level. Most working people who are above thepoverty level can not afford the rip off premiums of the health care monopolies.

"The main requirement of Medicaid eligibility is determining that a low income situation exists in the home. Currently, the requirement states that the family’s income must be below the poverty level. The number of people living in the household is taken into consideration, and all forms of income are counted, including child and spousal support. In 2014, some states will increase their financial Medicaid eligibility requirements to 133% of the poverty level. Therefore, many people who did not previously qualify for Medicaid will find themselves eligible at that time."

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

no it;s equality.

What's the difference between 100% redistribution of income and 50% redistribution of income?

How about we fix the problems instead of punishing success?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Where does the constitution give Congress power to set up national health care?

The same place it gives it the power to set up national monuments.

 

[P@triot]

40 milo lacko

Why you ignorant slut. Everybody who can not afford health care can get medicaid.

You must be below the poverty level. Most working people who are above thepoverty level can not afford the rip off premiums of the health care monopolies.

"The main requirement of Medicaid eligibility is determining that a low income situation exists in the home. Currently, the requirement states that the family’s income must be below the poverty level. The number of people living in the household is taken into consideration, and all forms of income are counted, including child and spousal support. In 2014, some states will increase their financial Medicaid eligibility requirements to 133% of the poverty level. Therefore, many people who did not previously qualify for Medicaid will find themselves eligible at that time."

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

no it;s equality.

And therein lies the problem. There is no "equality" from you parasites. While people like Steve Jobs put in 18 hour days to earn their billions, asshat parasites like you lay around getting stoned and playing Xbox all day while demanding you are entitled to things.

When are we going to see EQUALITY of effort from Dumbocrats? When are we going to see EQUALITY of talent from Dumbocrats? When are we going to see EQUALITY of results from Dumbocrats [MENTION=42294]Snookie[/MENTION]?

When you people get off your lazy asses and start working as hard as I do, I'll make sure you get economic "equality". Until then, suck it you lazy little bitches!

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

If, in fact, the Supreme Courts judiciary powers is to interpret the law, then it is logically consistent that it has the judiciary power to interpret the Constitution.

.

They also WRITE LAWS AND REPEAL LAWS. those are legislative functions and the constitution says all legislative powers are in congress. THINK.

 

[P@triot]

Where does the constitution give Congress power to set up national health care?

The same place it gives it the power to set up national monuments.

It doesn't do that either. Care to try again NYC?

(Hint: 2 wrongs do not equal 1 right)

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Where does the constitution give Congress power to set up national health care?

The same place it gives it the power to set up national monuments.

Which means congress just granted themselves the power.!!! The states need to say that. They are supposed to be a check on the feds but they haven't done that in a long time.

 

[regent]

Where does the constitution give Congress power to set up national health care?

The same place it gives it the power to set up national monuments.

Which means congress just granted themselves the power.!!! The states need to say that. They are supposed to be a check on the feds but they haven't done that in a long time.

The power for Obamacare comes from Article one, Section eight, Clause one of the Constitution. Same place the power to create Social Security came from.
Those are not the hard ones, there are some real puzzlers, but most have been through the Court checkup.
But here's another tack, when Congress passes a law it have to indicate which part of Constitution applies to the law?

 

[Snookie]

So your complaint isn't about the poor at all? It's about some people having more money than others and wanting to right that wrong? Isn't that communism?

no it;s equality.

What's the difference between 100% redistribution of income and 50% redistribution of income?

How about we fix the problems instead of punishing success?

Punishing sucess is an oxymoron.

 

[P@triot]

no it;s equality.

What's the difference between 100% redistribution of income and 50% redistribution of income?

How about we fix the problems instead of punishing success?

Punishing sucess is an oxymoron.

Apparently you have absolutely no idea what "oxymoron" means because that sentence didn't make an ounce of sense...

 

[RKMBrown]

What's the difference between 100% redistribution of income and 50% redistribution of income?

How about we fix the problems instead of punishing success?

Punishing sucess is an oxymoron.

Apparently you have absolutely no idea what "oxymoron" means because that sentence didn't make an ounce of sense...

His kind punish success as a matter of life and death consequence... only through cognitive dissonance can their brains continue functioning. If you force him to understand why the sentence does not make sense his brain will stop working and he will die.

 

[Snookie]

What's the difference between 100% redistribution of income and 50% redistribution of income?

How about we fix the problems instead of punishing success?

Punishing sucess is an oxymoron.

Apparently you have absolutely no idea what "oxymoron" means because that sentence didn't make an ounce of sense...

Not to a nitwit like you.

 

[Snookie]

Punishing sucess is an oxymoron.

Apparently you have absolutely no idea what "oxymoron" means because that sentence didn't make an ounce of sense...

His kind punish success as a matter of life and death consequence... only through cognitive dissonance can their brains continue functioning. If you force him to understand why the sentence does not make sense his brain will stop working and he will die.

Now you're a brain surgeon. You sure are smart.

 

[RKMBrown]

Apparently you have absolutely no idea what "oxymoron" means because that sentence didn't make an ounce of sense...

His kind punish success as a matter of life and death consequence... only through cognitive dissonance can their brains continue functioning. If you force him to understand why the sentence does not make sense his brain will stop working and he will die.

Now you're a brain surgeon. You sure are smart.

No not even a psychologist... and thanks.