Where Do Government School “Facts” Come From?

That's an outright lie, go ahead, pick something from her post and debate her on it. Most of you lefties just come in and spew garbage, you never, ever address the topic of the op. Put your money where your mouth is, and post about the op instead of maligning the person that started it.
I applaud the fact that you want to see this for yourself so here goes. PoliticalChic wrote:

5. Which sort of historian’s ‘facts’ do you suppose end up in the curriculum of government school? And, do you suppose the little captives in government school had the desire or ability to question why they were being taught only one view of history?

Let's first ask her what she means by a "government school"? In my county the K-12 system is run by a superintendent selected by our locally elected school board. What is being taught in our schools is ultimately up to us. WE are the government. True the state and feds may offer input but our schools are locally funded. If our children are being taught only one view of history it is because that is what we want them to learn. Sorry, but it is not her view of history.
 
pick something from her post and debate her on it.

There is no such thing as a government school fact. Except maybe the cost of free, reduced and regular meals. those are set in stone every year for schools who participate in the NSLP.

Mostly it's the local school boards that supervises what is taught and how it's taught in their schools.
 
There is no such thing as a government school fact. Except maybe the cost of free, reduced and regular meals. those are set in stone every year for schools who participate in the NSLP.

Mostly it's the local school boards that supervises what is taught and how it's taught in their schools.
Where do they all get their curriculum materials from?
 
There is no such thing as a government school fact. Except maybe the cost of free, reduced and regular meals. those are set in stone every year for schools who participate in the NSLP.

Mostly it's the local school boards that supervises what is taught and how it's taught in their schools.


Your silly lies have always been both disgusting and transparent.

Government schools are were children are indoctrinated with racist Critical Race Theory, advanced by your party.


Like the ones controlled by Democrats in Virginia:







 
Where do they all get their curriculum materials from?

I don't believe there is a single source for that. My daughter teaches at a university and she is responsible for the curriculum in the classes she teaches.
 
Government schools are were children are indoctrinated with racist Critical Race Theory

Oh Stinky, you never disappoint. What is your favorite part about Critical Race Theory to hate?

What is for you, the most hated tenant of CRT?

There's gotta be one.
 
Oh Stinky, you never disappoint. What is your favorite part about Critical Race Theory to hate?

What is for you, the most hated tenant of CRT?

There's gotta be one.


Hate???

I suppose...you: enemies of truth, equality, and America.
 
8. And for a bit of context about Liberals historians…..they lie as frequently as Biden supporters.



Michael Beschloss is mentioned in the Axios article as having given Biden the OK to expand government to an unrecognizable size. And this is the sort that provide the “facts” for government school students.

This is Beschloss making a fool of himself over Obama:


Beschloss....the 'historian'...and ' specialist in the United States presidency,' was being interviewed on the Don Imus Radio Show....and, in a sterling example of his expertise as an historian.....claimed that Obama was the smartest man ever to apply for the office of President.

Unfortunately for him....and unexpectedly....Imus questioned him....


"November 11, 2008
Historian Michael Beschloss was interviewed Monday on Don Imus’ radio show and he made the claim that President-elect Obama’s IQ is off the charts and that he is the smartest president we have ever had. Here is the meat of the conversation:

Quote:
Historian Michael Beschloss: Yeah. Even aside from the fact of electing the first African American President and whatever one’s partisan views this is a guy whose IQ is off the charts — I mean you cannot say that he is anything but a very serious and capable leader and — you know — You and I have talked about this for years …

Imus: Well. What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: … our system doesn’t allow those people to become President, those people meaning people THAT smart and THAT capable

Imus: What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: Pardon?

Imus: What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: Uh. I would say it’s probably - he’s probably the smartest guy ever to become President.




You can find the full audio on the show here. WTKK - Imus In The Morning, 96.9 WTKK, Boston*-*Imus in the Morning guest: Michael Beschloss 11/10/08
You have to fast forward to about 13 minutes in to get the good stuff.
How can someone claim that an IQ is off the charts when they don’t even know what that person’s IQ is and for that matter, where the hell are Obama’s school records period? Did he even have good grades? Did he have good grades when he was snorting cocaine? He’s hiding all his transcripts in his bid to be transparent, so we’ll never know.


And what is even more laughable - does this Beschloss guy even know the IQs of any of the presidents. You know that Reagan sure was an idiot. And how about that Jefferson guy, all he could do was write a Declaration of Independence. Washington sure was stupid, he was just a military genius. And Madison, don’t even get me started. Obama hasn’t done a damn thing yet and he is already a genius and I heard some poll today that has a 60%+ approval rating for him. Never mind that he only got 52% of the vote."
Obama Is Our Smartest President?



They lie.
About everything.
And anything.

If you see "Democrat".....you can bet it's a liar attached.
 

9. Don't mistake the slanting of history by these 'historians' as insignificant.

The embrace of the Soviet Union by Roosevelt is difficult to explain.

1933 was the onset of both a) Soviet espionage's "golden age," and of b) Roosevelt's conferring of diplomatic recognition on the Soviet Union. 1933.







"The penetration of our government by Soviet spies was about far more than it is generally understood to be: eavesdropping and stealing scientific data and battle plans.
Rather it is about weakening the nation, diluting its character. And that is why so very much effort is put into controlling journalism, academia, and the dissemination of information.

Liberals stamp out dissent by social and professional ostracism and legal discrimination. This is the modern version of methods used by medieval Christianity: a secular Inquisition.

Intelligentsia as grand inquisitors: in the media, universities, the law, political and professional groups. The dominating ideologies include anti-capitalism, feminism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. They form the unchallengeable orthodoxy in academia.

No challenges or deviations are permitted, and anyone who does not share these values is defined as extreme.
These ideologies have as their common theme the overturning of the established order of the West. How ironic that intellectual liberty is assaulted within the institutions of reason."
Melanie Philips, “The World Turned Upside Down,” ch 6​

 
Universities: the places that the Left most dominates are the least free places in America

Pretty sad, huh.
Amen to that, and enrollment is rapidly declining right now as well. I get to personally observe how those PhD's in administration have refused to see the writing on the wall and accept responsibility, and it's costing people their jobs. But they don't care, just like politicians, they'll be rewarded by an even bigger and better position somewhere else once they've wrung the well dry where they're currently at.
 

Forum List

Back
Top