When trump's retribution tour begins, could someone tell me if....

[Billiejeens]

That's not what a Banana Republic is. A Banana Republic is one where they have a resource, say, bananas (yeah, I know right?) and that's where the majority of their money comes from, and it's also unstable because of that.

No

It's a store at the mall.

 

[sealybobo]

Nope.
None of that happened.
You are a useful idiot.
That is why you are on the wrong side of everything.

Your side hasn't even taken over yet. Why don't you wait before deciding it's me who's on the wrong side of history.

The problem is, you guys never admit when you suck or you are wrong. It took how many years before you guys finally admitted Bush lied us into Iraq? He did it in 2003. The Dixie Chicks knew it. You Bush supporters ruined them. 14 years later you voted for a guy who ran on it.

 

[TimFitz]

Democrats are DEATHLY afraid of getting a taste of their own medicine

Remind us.

When, exactly did any Democrat ever threaten grand jury members or prosecutors who dared to do their jobs?

 

[sealybobo]

None of those actually happened, real world.

You can't make the shit up Trump did. He was brazen. Why? Because if Bush could get away with lying us into Iraq and stealing 2000, why can't Trump get away with it?

 

[Billiejeens]

You can't make the shit up Trump did. He was brazen. Why? Because if Bush could get away with lying us into Iraq and stealing 2000, why can't Trump get away with it?

More things that never happened.

 

[sealybobo]

More things that never happened.

Trump and I know it's all true. It's why Trump tried the exact same tactic Bush used in 2000. Start a riot to stop the certification of the vote. Or recount as it were in 2000. Brooks Brother Riots. Roger Stone was involved in 2000 and 2020. So we know Bush stole 2000 because Trump tried the very same tactic. Only Trump tried to stop Mike Pence, not a one state recount. Which you swear "Bush won". LOL. Like you know, dummy. Trump knows what happened. Back then he was a Democrat so not blind like you. Why do you think Trump doesn't trust Voting Machine Companies? Duh.

Sidney Powell illegally hacked into a Georgia voting machine. That didn't happen either? I guess the winners get to write history.

“When she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I’m very impressed by her. I think she’s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn’t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost – it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would’ve been a wonderful thing,” Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

 

[kyzr]

They did. Your false narrative is an absurd relic with no basis in truth. The Kraken had every opportunity to make a factual case to back up their assertions. They couldn't.

They didn't have time right after the election to do a thorough analysis of the votes.
2020 had about 26,000,000 more votes than 2016. That is two standard deviations above the norm.
That is an unusual number of new voters based on historical norms, one might even call it suspicious.
2024 had 4,000,000 fewer voters than 2020, which is also unusual based on historic norms.
As I said, if the DOJ/FBI investigates 2020 and finds no anomalies, case closed. But there are/were suspicious numbers.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump and I know it's all true. It's why Trump tried the exact same tactic Bush used in 2000. Start a riot to stop the certification of the vote. Or recount as it were in 2000. Brooks Brother Riots. Roger Stone was involved in 2000 and 2020. So we know Bush stole 2000 because Trump tried the very same tactic. Only Trump tried to stop Mike Pence, not a one state recount. Which you swear "Bush won". LOL. Like you know, dummy. Trump knows what happened. Back then he was a Democrat so not blind like you. Why do you think Trump doesn't trust Voting Machine Companies? Duh.

Sidney Powell illegally hacked into a Georgia voting machine. That didn't happen either? I guess the winners get to write history.

“When she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I’m very impressed by her. I think she’s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn’t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost – it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would’ve been a wonderful thing,” Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

The winners do get to write the history books.

That's the only thing that you got right.

 

[kyzr]

Yes, it's a fact, though we can argue about your fatuous characterization he stole them. The point being Biden's case, with it's vastly different circumstances, has no relevance to trump's illegal refusal to comply with a subpoena.

Biden only had access to classified documents inside a SCIF, so he had to steal them.

Back to Trump, here is Jonathan Turley's rationale' for the various claims

Why the Case Against Donald Trump Remains Incomplete

Below is my column in the Hill on the lingering questions concerning any prosecution of former President Donald Trump for the retention of classified or sensitive material. As previously discussed,…

jonathanturley.org

Below is my column in the Hill on the lingering questions concerning any prosecution of former President Donald Trump for the retention of classified or sensitive material.
The Trump team insists this defense was raised when an earlier subpoena was served at Mar-a-Lago in June. Nevertheless, it reportedly turned over 15 boxes of material, including classified documents, and replaced a lock on the storage area for enhanced security. But it is not clear whether the FBI raised concerns over the remaining material or sought its return before this week’s raid.

So as I said before, the FBI's 1st subpoena was honored, so why didn't the FBI remove ALL classified documents?
Trump complied.

 

[berg80]

Remind us.

When, exactly did any Democrat ever threaten grand jury members or prosecutors who dared to do their jobs?

trump's anger over being indicted caused him to lash out at his accusers just as he was taught to do by Roy Cohn. It's a conditioned response.

The failure of trumples has been to blindly accept........well.........anything trump says..........but especially his self-serving campaign to tear away at the fabric of the justice system as a means of obscuring focus on his crimes.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Democrats should be worried about being questioned by new grand juries in about two months.

I am sure they will be terrified.

 

[berg80]

Biden only had access to classified documents inside a SCIF, so he had to steal them.

Back to Trump, here is Jonathan Turley's rationale' for the various

Why the Case Against Donald Trump Remains Incomplete

Below is my column in the Hill on the lingering questions concerning any prosecution of former President Donald Trump for the retention of classified or sensitive material. As previously discussed,…

jonathanturley.org

Below is my column in the Hill on the lingering questions concerning any prosecution of former President Donald Trump for the retention of classified or sensitive material.
The Trump team insists this defense was raised when an earlier subpoena was served at Mar-a-Lago in June. Nevertheless, it reportedly turned over 15 boxes of material, including classified documents, and replaced a lock on the storage area for enhanced security. But it is not clear whether the FBI raised concerns over the remaining material or sought its return before this week’s raid.

So as I said before, the FBI's 1st subpoena was honored, so why didn't the FBI remove ALL classified documents?
Trump complied.

Sounds like lawfare, intermingled with lies.

Lawyer Told Trump Defying Documents Subpoena Would Be a Crime​

Not long after federal prosecutors issued a subpoena last year for all the classified documents that former President Donald J. Trump took with him from the White House to his estate in southern Florida, one of his lawyers told him, in no uncertain terms, that it would be a crime if he did not comply with the demand, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The lawyer, Jennifer Little, this year related the account of her discussion with Mr. Trump to a grand jury overseen by the special counsel Jack Smith. She is one of several witnesses who prosecutors were told had advised Mr. Trump to cooperate.

A few months after Ms. Little testified to the grand jury, Mr. Smith charged Mr. Trump with violating the subpoena for the documents and obstructing the government’s repeated efforts to reclaim nearly three dozen classified documents that he removed from the White House.

As part of her grand jury appearance, Ms. Little told prosecutors that the former president clearly understood her warning, the person familiar with the matter said.

Lawyer Told Trump Defying Documents Subpoena Would Be a Crime

The lawyer, Jennifer Little, recounted the discussion to a grand jury overseen by the special counsel Jack Smith before he brought charges against the former president.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Thunk]

Remind us.

When, exactly did any Democrat ever threaten grand jury members or prosecutors who dared to do their jobs?

Remind us.

Who RAN ON A PLATFORM of "i'm gonna get Trump...I'm gonna put him in prison"? Who made those CAMPAIGN PROMISES?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Get down on your knees and thank Trump that I'm not POTUS because all your Dem leaders would be LOCKED UP.

You are a true Constituion loving American.

 

[berg80]

They didn't have time right after the election to do a thorough analysis of the votes.

That alone is reason enough for the courts to dismiss their cases. Lots of time has past. There is still no evidence of voter fraud of any consequence.

 

[berg80]

So as I said before, the FBI's 1st subpoena was honored, so why didn't the FBI remove ALL classified documents?
Trump complied.

Nope.

7. On March 30, 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened a criminal investigation into the unlawful retention of classified documents at The Mar-a-Lago Club. A federal grand jury investigation began the next month. The grand jury issued a subpoena requiring TRUMP to tum over all documents with classification markings. TRUMP endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents by, among other things:

a. suggesting that his attorney falsely represent to the FBI and grand jury that TRUMP did not have documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

b. directing defendant WALTINE NAUTA to move boxes of documents to conceal them from TRUMP's attorney, the FBI, and the grand jury;

c. suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

d. providing to the FBI and grand jury just some of the documents called for by the grand jury subpoena, while claiming that he was cooperating fully;

e. causing a certification to be submitted to the FBI and grand jury falsely representing that all documents called for by the grand jury subpoena had been produced- while knowing that, in fact, not all such documents had been produced; and

f. attempting to delete security camera footage at The Mar-a-Lago Club to conceal information from the FBI and grand jury.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf

 

[Hollie]

That alone is reason enough for the courts to dismiss their cases. Lots of time has past. There is still no evidence of voter fraud of any consequence.

Wait, what? Biden groupies are going to lecture anyone regarding statute of limitations?

 

[berg80]

Wait, what? Biden groupies are going to lecture anyone regarding statute of limitations?

It's not a matter of an expiration of the statute of limitations. It's a matter of there being no convincing evidence of determinate voter fraud to this day. Even you, as a cuck, knows that.

 

[sealybobo]

Nope.

7. On March 30, 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened a criminal investigation into the unlawful retention of classified documents at The Mar-a-Lago Club. A federal grand jury investigation began the next month. The grand jury issued a subpoena requiring TRUMP to tum over all documents with classification markings. TRUMP endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents by, among other things:

a. suggesting that his attorney falsely represent to the FBI and grand jury that TRUMP did not have documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

b. directing defendant WAL TINE NAUT A to move boxes of documents to conceal them from TRUMP's attorney, the FBI, and the grand jury;

c. suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

d. providing to the FBI and grand jury just some of the documents called for by the grand jury subpoena, while claiming that he was cooperating fully;

e. causing a certification to be submitted to the FBI and grand jury falsely representing that all documents called for by the grand jury subpoena had been produced- while knowing that, in fact, not all such documents had been produced; and

f. attempting to delete security camera footage at The Mar-a-Lago Club to conceal information from the FBI and grand jury.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf

Here's what I remember. Biden had a few classified documents in his personal possession. There's an explanation though. He was teaching a class on it and that's why. Anyways, they didn't want to embarrass Trump or call him out on exploiting this, so they just said "everyone has some top secret shit, everyone turn them in" So everyone except Trump did. And then Trump, of course, had two staffers lie to FBI and say he turned everything in. But then they got caught lying for Trump and they decided not to go to jail for him like all the rest. They would testify.

Either they lied to FBI or Trump lied to them. Why would Trump's employees lie? Were they the ones selling those top secrets? That's even worse! LOL

 

[Lesh]

Nope.

7. On March 30, 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened a criminal investigation into the unlawful retention of classified documents at The Mar-a-Lago Club. A federal grand jury investigation began the next month. The grand jury issued a subpoena requiring TRUMP to tum over all documents with classification markings. TRUMP endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents by, among other things:

a. suggesting that his attorney falsely represent to the FBI and grand jury that TRUMP did not have documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

b. directing defendant WALTINE NAUTA to move boxes of documents to conceal them from TRUMP's attorney, the FBI, and the grand jury;

c. suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents called for by the grand jury subpoena;

d. providing to the FBI and grand jury just some of the documents called for by the grand jury subpoena, while claiming that he was cooperating fully;

e. causing a certification to be submitted to the FBI and grand jury falsely representing that all documents called for by the grand jury subpoena had been produced- while knowing that, in fact, not all such documents had been produced; and

f. attempting to delete security camera footage at The Mar-a-Lago Club to conceal information from the FBI and grand jury.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf

They don’t care. They’ll just keep lying