When Trump goes to court, he will be found guilty

Funny, so if it is a liberal court no conservative can get a fair trial and if the court is conservative no liberal can get a fair trial. Do you realize how ridiculous that makes you sound .
i just don't put a lot of faith in politics, let alone what is still effectively a 2-party system.
 
Here is another fact. Nobody in the history of the United States of America, has ever been charged with a Federal indictment of the crime of collusion, in our entire history. There is no Federal collusion statute in the US Penal Code, and never has been.
Must be why democrats love to do it..
 
wasn't the point of the conversation at all, Anger Issues.

Someone claimed that a jury would never find against Hump. But a jury already has.

If the evidence is clear enough, only the most fanatical Branch Trumpidian can ignore it.
Ignore? What an interesting word usage coming from a lib…
 
They will do exactly what they did when congress investigated him for his jan6th attempt to bring down our government. He will be found guilty because all the witnesses against him will be his own ex cabinet member , his own ex lawyers, his closest allies and the biggest witnesses will be his own family. No Jury will find him not guilty. From now on every charge and investigation will put him in front of a judge and in all cases his own people will be the witnesses against him, and they will bring him down. Then after his first case being found guilty, they will start charging about 3 dozen republicans, or more, most being sitting politicians. They will never be allowed to be part of this government ever because they will be felons.
amajmamzmmamamamammaka.jpeg
 
Give us even the slightest way he will be not guilty. Even if one of his zombie follower gets on his jury after the testimony and mostly after the people thye use to testify against him. When the information is out showing what a pig this man is ,even if the zombie found him not guilty , he would have to know that he would then be scrutinized non strop for the rest of his life for the lie.The zombie would be giving up his future if he lied.
Well, that's why I referred to a "True Believer". Someone like that doesn't consider your logical thought about what the consequences of wrecking a trial might be. Remember -- and I say this all the time -- a lot of these people really do believe that this is an existential war against evil. Literally. So hanging a jury to save America from evil? No problem for a True Believer. Plus, that person would immediately become a hero to millions and enjoy whatever financial/professional/personal benefits that may come from that.

Supposedly there are mountains of evidence against Trump and his cronies in multiple supposedly upcoming trials. Okay. I've just learned to not make any assumptions. We're in uncharted territory, jbander. We'll see.
 
So is falsifying election records... your boy is going down.
You're hallucinating, and PROJECTING!!!!
Trump never had the means to "falsifying election records", you just pulled that out of your rear-end!!!!
You fucking Stalinist assholes are going too far, and one way or another this darkness got to give....
:evil:
 
You're hallucinating, and PROJECTING!!!!
Trump never had the means to "falsifying election records", you just pulled that out of your rear-end!!!!
You fucking Stalinist assholes are going too far, and one way or another this darkness got to give....

Except he didn't report the expenditure to the FEC like he was supposed to, that's what makes it a crime.

The feds might have declined to prosecute, but there's nothing keeping the state from doing it.

12 New Yorkers who have put up with Trump and his nonsense for years? He's toast.
 
Except he didn't report the expenditure to the FEC like he was supposed to, that's what makes it a crime.

The feds might have declined to prosecute, but there's nothing keeping the state from doing it.

12 New Yorkers who have put up with Trump and his nonsense for years? He's toast.
What the FUCK does that "expenditure" have to do with "falsifying election results"??????
You are FLAILING!!!!!
Fuck you and your Stalinist brain damage!!!!
:rolleyes:
 
Just because you don't (want to) understand the case, doesn't mean it's not solid.

Trump paid a porn star for sex, paid her to keep quiet, and then hid the entire thing.
AGAIN, how does that equal FALSIFYING ELECTION RECORDS????
Your Stalinist stretching is PATHETIC!!!!
 
AGAIN, how does that equal FALSIFYING ELECTION RECORDS????
Your Stalinist stretching is PATHETIC!!!!

He claimed it as "legal expenses", not a bribe to a whore.

That's why it was falsifying election records.

His argument that he was just trying to spare his wife is laughable, because the goal was only to keep it quiet until after the election.
 
He claimed it as "legal expenses", not a bribe to a whore.

That's why it was falsifying election records.

His argument that he was just trying to spare his wife is laughable, because the goal was only to keep it quiet until after the election.
Oh give it up you Stalinist pos demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie!!!
Self-awareness much????
Give it a try!
 

Forum List

Back
Top