When The Public is Disarmed, This is What They Get Instead

[Wry Catcher]

and see how the german soldiers or kings men killed their jewish , gay and gypsie population . Old pictures of germans being killed by government paid soldiers should help you understand why all people should be armed Brian .

Wasn't Obama saying he was going to have his own army that was going to be as strong as our military?

No, or not in the context which you suggest.

 

[2aguy]

Wrong asshole......it is in their Constitution but is not allowed by their government...exactly what you morons want here....

They can and do own guns moron. Stop the lies already.

So brainless....do they line up at the one gun store in mexico to buy all these guns? Thats right brainless...there is only one gun store in mexico.
And the odds of you getting a license to carry a firearm are around zero.
So yes,guns are restricted to the point that the average citizen has no chance of owning one legally.....sounds a lot like Barry's plans for America.

Private sales are legal. If ownership is so restricted why do they own more guns than Israel? Shouldn't Israel be the most concerned?

Look at the restrictions numb nut.
Owning a Gun in México

And to compare a country with a 122 million people to a country with 8 million is disingenuous at best.

All that and they still own more guns than Israel. Even Israel doesn't believe your BS.

Population doesn't matter, the rate of ownership is much higher in Mexico.

What lying troll you are brain....

 

[2aguy]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

I'm not certain but you seem to me to be not very bright, obsessed with guns and rowing with one oar in the water. It's no wonder someone like you (I very much hope there are not many like you this side of ISIS) is opposed to background checks.

What do you mean by background checks?

In your case, the MMPI. For most others, an FBI and all State/local jurisdiction check of all criminal and civil records, all arrests and detentions (civil or criminal), all court injunctions, a credit check and confidential reports from a current and past spouse(s) or SO's. Disclosure of all sealed records as to the nature of the sealed record, when and where that action took place and the nature of the event which was sealed. The address of all places the person seeking a gun has lived and a list of all foreign travel. All of which to be provided under oath and penalty of perjury.

Any omission of material facts would be flagged in a national data base and make any sale, loan or other method of providing a gun to said individual a felony.

Not necessary... Checks are already in place.
Enforce current laws any new laws are frivolous and we don't have the time or money to deal with that sort of BS...

I think you're a liar. You being so focused on gun issues (obsessed), you have to be aware of illegal gun sales and loopholes which allow some who couldn't pass the background check to obtain guns.

We have plenty of time to make background checks, its the person who seeks the gun who may be in a hurry. How much money is lost when 49 people are murdered?

Think about the national cost for medical care, autopsies, investigations, incarcerations, trials, probation reports, attorney fees, prison commitments and appeals, not just for mass murders but for all shootings not cleared as justifiable. Of course even justifiable requires hours of investigation.

And the money saved when 1,500,000 times a year Americans use guns to actually stop violent criminal attack, and save lives and even stop mass shooters, like last sunday night at the other night club......

And who will pay for your extensive background checks? How will the poor be able to afford them?

It has been pointed out that in one state they tried to exempt those under the poverty level from paying fees for owning a gun.....democrats voted it down.....of course this is a violation of the 14th Amendment....and likely the 5th Amendment against self incrimination...

but who is going to pay for the background checks you want?

 

[Rustic]

More firearms in lawful hands... Less crime

I'm not certain but you seem to me to be not very bright, obsessed with guns and rowing with one oar in the water. It's no wonder someone like you (I very much hope there are not many like you this side of ISIS) is opposed to background checks.

What do you mean by background checks?

In your case, the MMPI. For most others, an FBI and all State/local jurisdiction check of all criminal and civil records, all arrests and detentions (civil or criminal), all court injunctions, a credit check and confidential reports from a current and past spouse(s) or SO's. Disclosure of all sealed records as to the nature of the sealed record, when and where that action took place and the nature of the event which was sealed. The address of all places the person seeking a gun has lived and a list of all foreign travel. All of which to be provided under oath and penalty of perjury.

Any omission of material facts would be flagged in a national data base and make any sale, loan or other method of providing a gun to said individual a felony.

Not necessary... Checks are already in place.
Enforce current laws any new laws are frivolous and we don't have the time or money to deal with that sort of BS...

I think you're a liar. You being so focused on gun issues (obsessed), you have to be aware of illegal gun sales and loopholes which allow some who couldn't pass the background check to obtain guns.

We have plenty of time to make background checks, its the person who seeks the gun who may be in a hurry. How much money is lost when 49 people are murdered?

Think about the national cost for medical care, autopsies, investigations, incarcerations, trials, probation reports, attorney fees, prison commitments and appeals, not just for mass murders but for all shootings not cleared as justifiable. Of course even justifiable requires hours of investigation.

For a law-abiding citizens it should only take seconds to run a instant background check, and it should not cost them anything to have it done. Because it is a right...
And private sales should never be subject to any type of background check…

 

[Brain357]

They can and do own guns moron. Stop the lies already.

So brainless....do they line up at the one gun store in mexico to buy all these guns? Thats right brainless...there is only one gun store in mexico.
And the odds of you getting a license to carry a firearm are around zero.
So yes,guns are restricted to the point that the average citizen has no chance of owning one legally.....sounds a lot like Barry's plans for America.

Private sales are legal. If ownership is so restricted why do they own more guns than Israel? Shouldn't Israel be the most concerned?

Look at the restrictions numb nut.
Owning a Gun in México

And to compare a country with a 122 million people to a country with 8 million is disingenuous at best.

All that and they still own more guns than Israel. Even Israel doesn't believe your BS.

Population doesn't matter, the rate of ownership is much higher in Mexico.

What lying troll you are brain....

No, you are the lying troll. Mexico has more ownership than Israel. I proved that with a link. Stop being a child and screaming liar.

 

[Brain357]

I'm not certain but you seem to me to be not very bright, obsessed with guns and rowing with one oar in the water. It's no wonder someone like you (I very much hope there are not many like you this side of ISIS) is opposed to background checks.

What do you mean by background checks?

In your case, the MMPI. For most others, an FBI and all State/local jurisdiction check of all criminal and civil records, all arrests and detentions (civil or criminal), all court injunctions, a credit check and confidential reports from a current and past spouse(s) or SO's. Disclosure of all sealed records as to the nature of the sealed record, when and where that action took place and the nature of the event which was sealed. The address of all places the person seeking a gun has lived and a list of all foreign travel. All of which to be provided under oath and penalty of perjury.

Any omission of material facts would be flagged in a national data base and make any sale, loan or other method of providing a gun to said individual a felony.

Not necessary... Checks are already in place.
Enforce current laws any new laws are frivolous and we don't have the time or money to deal with that sort of BS...

I think you're a liar. You being so focused on gun issues (obsessed), you have to be aware of illegal gun sales and loopholes which allow some who couldn't pass the background check to obtain guns.

We have plenty of time to make background checks, its the person who seeks the gun who may be in a hurry. How much money is lost when 49 people are murdered?

Think about the national cost for medical care, autopsies, investigations, incarcerations, trials, probation reports, attorney fees, prison commitments and appeals, not just for mass murders but for all shootings not cleared as justifiable. Of course even justifiable requires hours of investigation.

And the money saved when 1,500,000 times a year Americans use guns to actually stop violent criminal attack, and save lives and even stop mass shooters, like last sunday night at the other night club......

And who will pay for your extensive background checks? How will the poor be able to afford them?

It has been pointed out that in one state they tried to exempt those under the poverty level from paying fees for owning a gun.....democrats voted it down.....of course this is a violation of the 14th Amendment....and likely the 5th Amendment against self incrimination...

but who is going to pay for the background checks you want?

The 1.5 million myth again, very funny.

 

[Wry Catcher]

They have found a tunnel dug by hand at Ponar.

When you are disarmed by the government, digging your way out of death camps is your final state before they kill you, at least this is the result of such gun grabbing fascism in the 20th century.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/science/holocaust-ponar-tunnel-lithuania.html?_r=0

A team of archaeologists and mapmakers say they have uncovered a forgotten tunnel that 80 Jews dug largely by hand as they tried to escape from a Nazi extermination site in Lithuania about 70 years ago.

The Lithuanian site, Ponar, holds mass burial pits and graves where up to 100,000 people were killed and their bodies dumped or burned during the Holocaust.

Using radar and radio waves to scan beneath the ground, the researchers found the tunnel, a 100-foot passageway between five and nine feet below the surface, the team announced on Wednesday.

A previous attempt made by a different team in 2004 to find the underground structure had only located its mouth, which was subsequently left unmarked. The new finding traces the tunnel from entrance to exit and provides evidence to support survivor accounts of the harrowing effort to escape the holding pit.

Who, besides you and others similar to you, are seeking to disarm the public?

You and I are on the opposite sides in the debate, you can find no post I've made which even suggests I support such an extreme action.

Your side wants more guns, and more guns in the hands of more people, and only after a person commits an atrocious act, are they to be relieved of their gun.

No.....moron.....we want normal, law abiding people to be able to own and carry guns for their own self defense.....and only after someone commits an actual crime....then they should be arrested, not before......yes...you loved stalin and the police state...but this is the United States where you are presumed innocent until proven guilty...you authoritarian ass.....

How does this impact you? You can't honestly expect anyone to believe you are normal? You're obsessed with guns, and that ain't normal.