When religion teaches you to hate...

[irosie91]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

 

[Penelope]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

 

[Penelope]

Sorry Irosie for interrupting but I forgot to mention .. Today we have social safety nets to look after the poor so they do not starve or their children in the time of Solomon men with means would take extra wives not for sex as Penelope misinterprets in either stupidity or on purpose but so these people would be looked after.. For example if my brother was to die Gd forbid it was my obligation to take in his wife and children so they were looked after.. It was their version of out social safety net today...

Yes relation all does that, but not to make his wife theirs.

 

[gt1085]

[QUOReligion comes from caucasians.We don`t practise your religionTE="HaShev, post: 14583481, member: 19748"]And out of all those concocted religions which ones do you truly understand and which ones have the least percentages of jail time?[/QUOTE]

 

[gt1085]

I have nothing against them,it`s there conception.

Let me step in if I may:
Moses had a speach impetiment, so will you throw out thou shalt not murder because he couldn't speak well?
People of foreign languages get translations into our language garbled, should they have no rights to speak or type in English speaking commentaries?
If not then what right did Romans have trying to discuss Hebrew stories and precepts when they clearly butchered it?
The NT is known to have over 50,000 errors and lies in it. How do you suppose we eliminate the 2 billion blundering fools from speaking?

I guess you don't know about the apostate jews do you.

Tiberius Julius Alexander (fl. 1st century) was an equestrian governor and general in the Roman Empire. Born into a wealthy Jewish family of Alexandria but abandoning or neglecting the Jewish religion, he rose to become procurator of Judea (c. 46 – 48) under Claudius. While Prefect of Egypt (66 – 69), he employed his legions against the Alexandrian Jews in a brutal response to ethnic violence, and was instrumental in the Emperor Vespasian's rise to power. In 70, he participated in the Siege of Jerusalem as Titus' second-in-command.[1]

Tiberius Julius Alexander was probably born early in the reign of the Emperor Tiberius (14 – 37). His father was Alexander, an Alexandrian Jew who held the office of Alabarch;[2] the exact meaning of this term is debated, but it may have denoted a senior customs official. The older Alexander enjoyed Roman citizenship, a rare privilege among the Jews of Alexandria, and therefore passed it to his sons.[3] He also had business connections both with Agrippa, grandson of Herod the Great, and with Antonia, mother of the emperor Claudius.[4] Another prominent member of Tiberius Alexander's family was his uncle, the philosopher Philo

Tiberius Julius Alexander - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Then along with Josephus Rome had plenty of help, Philo was known for Logos, the Word. See Rome wanted to create an all inclusive religion, one that had Greek, Roman and Jewish components, to ease the tension when the jews rebelled.

When the empire started to break up, Constantine called a council to develop a creed which then became the religion of the Rome Empire, as he knew enforcing a common religion would create more control over the people, to create a more peaceful empire.

Yes i do know about The Real Jews and fake jews also.

 

[gt1085]

I have nothing against them,it`s there conception.

They also created the English language, towards which you are most obviously at war.

Have you ever considered literacy first and THEN posting on discussion boards?

Let me step in if I may:
Moses had a speach impetiment, so will you throw out thou shalt not murder because he couldn't speak well?
People of foreign languages get translations into our language garbled, should they have no rights to speak or type in English speaking commentaries?
If not then what right did Romans have trying to discuss Hebrew stories and precepts when they clearly butchered it?
The NT is known to have over 50,000 errors and lies in it. How do you suppose we eliminate the 2 billion blundering fools from speaking?

Fat people have fat fingers. They typo constantly on Phone access to forums, should we ban fat people from discussion forums or just comical auto corrections that make things worse?
How about little people, they have fat fingers too, should little people be banned?
Some people type freestyle, flowing text like a speach with little time to worry about grammar or typos, so should freestyle be banned or are you just using an
ad hominem against a position you can't argue? If all that's left in forums are proud and lofty people and frustrated English teachers with excuses, then conversation of substance will not exist.

Band them people are`nt seeking
truth no way,just opposition that will make them feel better,covering up Guilt."Antagonism".

 

[irosie91]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

 

[Penelope]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

 

[irosie91]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

I read history------in fact most the "history" presented in public schools in the USA was written by BRITISH historians. You would not know-----it seems that you have no public liberal education-----your got ROME.----btw--I read that crap too. I don't know any specific jewish historian who wrote about that period of time other than Josephus Flavius. For good historical fiction try Taylor Caldwell------she was not a JOOOO.

 

[irosie91]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

well known fact??? -------you got some information indicating. that JOOOOOOS scream "DEATH TO ROME" on holidays-----or during Saturday prayer services? For far too long Rome occupied and controlled Judea------and for the entertainment of roman sluts-----fed jews to lions and also enslaved jews. They did it to greeks too. Even discuss the issue with a greek? The most serious indictment on rome---as some Christian theologians interpret the New Testament is found as written by the ficticious JOHN in the book of revulsions--------they seem to think that the seven headed monster with whore on top is ROME. I have no idea. -----I never heard the word ROME mentioned in a synagogue----certainly not singled out for HATRED as religious idea as the cock sucking nun TAUGHT YOU

 

[Penelope]

Rome is wonderful according to Penelope... They never stole their neighbours women ... The Sabine women were taken by Rome by force there was even a war about it....At least Solomon did it in a way that was beneficial for both groups... Rome was notorious for taking what they wanted when they wanted how they wanted with little or nothing in return to believe otherwise is popycock or Penelope speak...

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

well known fact??? -------you got some information indicating. that JOOOOOOS scream "DEATH TO ROME" on holidays-----or during Saturday prayer services? For far too long Rome occupied and controlled Judea------and for the entertainment of roman sluts-----fed jews to lions and also enslaved jews. They did it to greeks too. Even discuss the issue with a greek? The most serious indictment on rome---as some Christian theologians interpret the New Testament is found as written by the ficticious JOHN in the book of revulsions--------they seem to think that the seven headed monster with whore on top is ROME. I have no idea. -----I never heard the word ROME mentioned in a synagogue----certainly not singled out for HATRED as religious idea as the cock sucking nun TAUGHT YOU

From what I have read the jews hated Greeks more than the Romans. Its true, Rome is probably most like the
beast in Revelation. Then again some of the elite jews got along well with the Romans and Greeks.

 

[irosie91]

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

well known fact??? -------you got some information indicating. that JOOOOOOS scream "DEATH TO ROME" on holidays-----or during Saturday prayer services? For far too long Rome occupied and controlled Judea------and for the entertainment of roman sluts-----fed jews to lions and also enslaved jews. They did it to greeks too. Even discuss the issue with a greek? The most serious indictment on rome---as some Christian theologians interpret the New Testament is found as written by the ficticious JOHN in the book of revulsions--------they seem to think that the seven headed monster with whore on top is ROME. I have no idea. -----I never heard the word ROME mentioned in a synagogue----certainly not singled out for HATRED as religious idea as the cock sucking nun TAUGHT YOU

From what I have read the jews hated Greeks more than the Romans. Its true, Rome is probably most like the
beast in Revelation. Then again some of the elite jews got along well with the Romans and Greeks.

You have not even read the bible------now you have some concept that jews 'HATE GREEKS' --------DA JOOOOOS did not write the book of revulsions.-------seems like someone else did not like ROME. Interestingly enough----DA JOOOS were and remain very fond of the greek philosophers and have studied their stuff for thousands of years------Muslims picked up bits and pieces of it from DA JOOOOOS ---in arabia and later in Spain and in Egypt (Alexandria). I grew up a jew and never heard NEGATIVE CHIT CHAT about DA GREEEKS-----
both Aristotle, Plato and Epicuris were all time faves among
jewish talmudists Of course ---ANTIOCHUS was ----as a singular greek ruler quite a bastard-----murdering pig like so
many of the roman rulers

 

[Muhammed]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

 

[irosie91]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

 

[irosie91]

way back then and in the course of human history there are all kinds of DIFFERENT rules about enslaved people. You cannot discuss this issue with Penelope----she is too stupid. Slavey by ROMAN law was just about the MOST barbaric----slaves had no rights at all------an owner could simply KILL the slave if he wanted to. Hagar was Sarah's "slave"----had Hagar been enslaved according to roman law-----Sarah could have LEGALLY slit her throat and the throat of Ishmael

that's why do many became freedmen, the Romans didn't treat slaves any worst than anyone else.

In fact---roman slaves had NO RIGHTS AT ALL-----by law. It is fact that was not so in ALL societies ----Even after being "freed" roman slaves remained IN DEBT to former owners----very rich people had ARMIES of them. Try learning something about history. It was a great advantage to landed rich aristocratic romans to have LOTS of "freed" slaves in their
entourage

And you read that from jewish writings. Yes, a well known fact is Jews do not like Rome or Romans , past or present.

well known fact??? -------you got some information indicating. that JOOOOOOS scream "DEATH TO ROME" on holidays-----or during Saturday prayer services? For far too long Rome occupied and controlled Judea------and for the entertainment of roman sluts-----fed jews to lions and also enslaved jews. They did it to greeks too. Even discuss the issue with a greek? The most serious indictment on rome---as some Christian theologians interpret the New Testament is found as written by the ficticious JOHN in the book of revulsions--------they seem to think that the seven headed monster with whore on top is ROME. I have no idea. -----I never heard the word ROME mentioned in a synagogue----certainly not singled out for HATRED as religious idea as the cock sucking nun TAUGHT YOU

From what I have read the jews hated Greeks more than the Romans. Its true, Rome is probably most like the
beast in Revelation. Then again some of the elite jews got along well with the Romans and Greeks.

I am fascinated with the use of the term "elite" by islamonazi dogs. "Some of the ""elite"" jews got along well with the romans and greeks" ?????? It is the nature of people to "get along" when in proximity to other persons who are amiable-------I get along with the Mexicans who live next door. SO? Scarlett O'Hara "got along" with Mammy. Islamo Nazi dogs like to make meaningless comments

 

[Muhammed]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

Priests and Imams are not religions.

 

[irosie91]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

Priests and Imams are not religions.

they are the teachers of religion-----you are falling back on an argument based on SEMANTICS? Muslims (ie people who consider themselves to be followers of the religion--islam) have murdered in the hundreds of millions for that which they
considered the ISLAMIC CAUSE. The same is true of person of the catholic "RELIGION" ---persons of the eastern orthodox faith and-----a runner up to catholics----and various
sects of protestants run a distant third. Altogether LOTS AND LOTS of people have been murdered for "religion"----lately the major murdering faith is ISLAM

 

[Muhammed]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

Priests and Imams are not religions.

they are the teachers of religion-----you are falling back on an argument based on SEMANTICS? Muslims (ie people who consider themselves to be followers of the religion--islam) have murdered in the hundreds of millions for that which they
considered the ISLAMIC CAUSE. The same is true of person of the catholic "RELIGION" ---persons of the eastern orthodox faith and-----a runner up to catholics----and various
sects of protestants run a distant third. Altogether LOTS AND LOTS of people have been murdered for "religion"----lately the major murdering faith is ISLAM

Religion cannot murder anyone.

 

[Penelope]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

Priests and Imams are not religions.

they are the teachers of religion-----you are falling back on an argument based on SEMANTICS? Muslims (ie people who consider themselves to be followers of the religion--islam) have murdered in the hundreds of millions for that which they
considered the ISLAMIC CAUSE. The same is true of person of the catholic "RELIGION" ---persons of the eastern orthodox faith and-----a runner up to catholics----and various
sects of protestants run a distant third. Altogether LOTS AND LOTS of people have been murdered for "religion"----lately the major murdering faith is ISLAM

Again let us remind you of jewish history

This section became known as Yevsektsia (alternative spelling: Yevsektsiya — the acronym of the department name in Russian) and was run by Jews.

These Jewish communists were incredibly ruthless in stamping out any type of religious activity by fellow Jews. They killed rabbis, closed the yeshivos and synagogues, banned all religious practices, and enforced it by getting friends to turn in neighbors, children to turn in parents and send them to Siberia for observing the religion. It was the Yevsektsia more than anything else that destroyed the Jewish community in Russia. (by Rabbi Berel Wein)

http://www.jewishhistory.org/jewish-europe-between-the-wars/

http://www.jewishdestiny.com/about/team-destiny/

 

[Penelope]

Example: Catholicism teaching that Jews were the "Christ killers".

If you are going to post such accusations then you need to post a reference to that accusation. Technically you are correct because that is more or less what the Bible teaches. But your implication is far from correct.

Religion does not teach people to hate.

"religion" does not teach ???? Imams in mosques teach people to hate. Priests in churches teach people to hate

and rabbis teach some to hate. Priests in the RCC do not.