“When people condemn Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking antisemites.”

[Lisa558]

" One Step Further Of Subjecting Universalism For Qurayshism Doctrine To Public Scrutiny "

* Accepts Every Option And Falls For Any Is All Wrapped Up In Political Misgivings *

The relevant civil liberties and social issues are scope and doctrinal expectations for implementing the nomian creeds of torahnism , qurayshism and fictional ishmaelism .

Opposition to implementation of torahnism , by actual lineal descendants of eponymous patriarch isaac , could be perceived as racially biased .

However , publicly claiming antisemitism while standing among semites , while those making the public claim are japhetic , appears precarious as racism , and semites often allude to the conundrum to ignore its own debase conjectures for sectarian supremacy of fictional ishmaelism .

The genetic religions of torahnism and qurayshism , via its eponymous nomian patriarchs , are limited in scope to its respective city states of israel and hejaz , whereas long term global and political expectations to implement the sectarian supremacy of fictional ishmaelism on a universal scope , even through violence as from doctrine , is a risk in much need of informed consent so as to safeguard independence of the individual as a basis for western society and for us republic .

Not sure what you’re going on about “Torahnism.” There is no “Torahnism” on college campuses. There is, however, rampant antisemitism where Jews are being assaulted, bullied, spit on, blocked from attended class, etc., etc., and the colleges are enabling it if not outright promoting it.

The question therefore was “isn’t it wrong for the government to give financial support to institutions enabling Jew-hate”?

 

[JoeB131]

Not sure what you’re going on about “Torahnism.” There is no “Torahnism” on college campuses. There is, however, rampant antisemitism where Jews are being assaulted, bullied, spit on, blocked from attended class, etc., etc., and the colleges are enabling it if not outright promoting it.

The question therefore was “isn’t it wrong for the government to give financial support to institutions enabling Jew-hate”?

Of course, the Jews could always stop supporting/committing Genocide, then they wouldn't be hated.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Instantiation Of Vernacular And Lexicon "

* Discerning Scopes Of Nomian Genetic Religion Versus Universality For Sectarian Supremacy *

Not sure what you’re going on about “Torahnism.” There is no “Torahnism” on college campuses. There is, however, rampant antisemitism where Jews are being assaulted, bullied, spit on, blocked from attended class, etc., etc., and the colleges are enabling it if not outright promoting it.
The question therefore was “isn’t it wrong for the government to give financial support to institutions enabling Jew-hate”?

The genetic religions of torahnism and qurayshism differ based on matriarchs , via a common eponymous patriarch of abraham , as ishmael was settled in paran , while isaac was settled in canaan .

The saheeh international translation of surah 9:111 states the following and clearly there is a difference between torahnism ( torah ) , qurayshism ( qurayn ) and antinomianism ( gospel ) , though there is not a directive to kill or be killed in the gospel :

Indeed, God has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān. And who is truer to his covenant than God? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.


* Not Quibbling About Dealing Directly With Pretentious Scope For Universality Of Sectarian Supremacy By Fictional Ishmaelism *

A contemporary assertion of antisemitism is more accurately an account of racism against japhetic peoples who are seeking to implement a semitic and nomian genetic religion of torahnism .

A contemporary assertion of antisemitism is analogous with " white " peoples being targeted with hate for promoting rap music and claiming that the persecution received is based in racism against " black " peoples .


* Goading To Invoke By No Name Will A Law Be Made *

There has already been an scapegoat and martyr sacrificed for antinomianism , to rebuke lunar tick crazed hue mammon apes invoking nomian creed .

. Zone1 - Why Do Zealots Justify Violence Because Their Goad Will Not Do It ? .

. End of Debate Over Whether To Reconcile .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" More Willing And Deserving To Have Sectarian Supremacy Of Fictional Ishmaelism Challenged "

* Edicts And Tenets For Violence Cannot Be Extricated From Doctrine *

Of course, the Jews could always stop supporting/committing Genocide, then they wouldn't be hated.

When will the pretentious universality for fictional ishmaelism , by its sectarian supremacist adherents , that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz , be realized as a debase absurdity ?

The author of the qurayn named surah 47 after itself , wherein none are disguising expectations for a final solution :

47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.

Perhaps the first 26 seconds of the following video might explain it more clearly .

 

[georgephillip]

A region? Hahahaahhaa

Palestine - Wikipedia

 

[BackAgain]

Um, okay, MLK was wrong. MLK has the problem a lot of Christians had after WWII, feeling really sad about the Holocaust and being willing to overlook Israel's colonialists policies. He probably SHOULD have known better, given the black experience in the US.

But again, 1967 was a different time. Now we know better.



And this is where your logic falls apart. The Zionists are a bunch of Europeans, who had no interest in moving to Palestine before 1945.



Why? Your inability to live in peace with other white people without pissing them off is why you should get someone else's land?

There are a whole bunch of groups that have suffered violence over the last 2000 years. The Basque, the Kurds, the Sinti, the Roma. Why do the Jews get special consideration?

The underlying LIE of Zionism is "A Land without a people for a people without a land!" Except there were people on that land. They had been there for centuries. They are still there and they are fighting back.



Or they can go back to Europe, where they came from.

If America is so keen on a Jewish State, we should give them one of ours. We have more than a few Red States barely anyone lives in, if this is such a laudable goal, we should put our money where our mouths are.

You know, instead of just blindly going along with a genocide.




One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Let's leave aside whether or not the Palestinians have a good reason to want to kill the Zionists.

The fact that they do want to kill the Zionists should be a good reason to want to live somewhere else.

If my neighbors came up to me tomorrow and said, "Joe, we really don't like you and we're going to strap bombs onto our kids to try to kill you", I'd move. Seriously.

What I wouldn't do is set up a sniper's nest on my balcony and start picking off the neighbor's kids because they MIGHT have a bomb strapped to them. That would only make matters worse.

^ typically verbose but false commentary from joeBitch.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Palestine - Wikipedia

Wikipedia now. What’s your next source, Al Jazeera?

 

[georgephillip]

Wikipedia now. What’s your next source, Al Jazeera?

"Palestine, officially the State of Palestine, is a country in West Asia.

"Recognized by a majority of UN member states, it encompasses the Israeli-occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, collectively known as the occupied Palestinian territories, within the broader geographic and historical Palestine region."

Palestine - Wikipedia

 

[JoeB131]

^ typically verbose but false commentary from joeBitch.

Did you need someone to explain the big words to you?

 

[BackAgain]

Did you need someone to explain the big words to you?

No. Maybe you do. But that’s not the problem with verbosity, you cock gobbler.

Shit. You apparently don’t even grasp what that word means. GFY.

 

[JoeB131]

No. Maybe you do. But that’s not the problem with verbosity, you cock gobbler.

Shit. You apparently don’t even grasp what that word means. GFY.

Look, man, if you want to participate in a message board, you have to be able to understand complex topics.

Otherwise, Facebook is more your speed. They have nice cat videos there.

 

[BackAgain]

Look, man, if you want to participate in a message board, you have to be able to understand complex topics.

Otherwise, Facebook is more your speed. They have nice cat videos there.

Look douchebag. It’s your lack of understanding and intelligence that’s the problem.

“Verbose” is a word with a meaning. You don’t understand even that much. Go play with blasting caps.

 

[JoeB131]

Look douchebag. It’s your lack of understanding and intelligence that’s the problem.

“Verbose” is a word with a meaning. You don’t understand even that much. Go play with blasting caps.

Yes, it means, "Lots of big words BackAgain doesn't understand because he got his education in a rural school in a district where family trees don't fork."

 

[rosends]

Um, no, not really. This was a case of white people oppressing a non-white people, and he should have called it for what it is. But he saw Jewish Americans as an ally in the Civil Rights movement. A great man, but not one above politics.

So you think that what he said was not out of belief but political maneuvering? Occam would cry.

Now you are just being disingenuous.

or you are being intentionally obtuse.

Well, for one thing, the Hashemites actively helped the British drive the Ottomans out.

Irrelevant -- the state was carved out of the same mandate with the same unilateral move. You object to one but not the other.

No, they weren't. There were less than 40K Jews living in Palestine in 1890.

Way to shift the goal posts. You made a claim and I showed how, historically it is not true. So you run to a different argument. At least you are getting some good exercise running away.

 

[Lisa558]

So you think that what he said was not out of belief but political maneuvering? Occam would cry.

or you are being intentionally obtuse.

Irrelevant -- the state was carved out of the same mandate with the same unilateral move. You object to one but not the other.

Way to shift the goal posts. You made a claim and I showed how, historically it is not true. So you run to a different argument. At least you are getting some good exercise running away.

I don’t know what JoeIB An Antisemite said, but from your responses I’m tempted to take a peek.

On second thought, he’s not worth it.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Mutable Thoughts Or Oar Ore Knot Not "

* A Well Is A Deep Subject *

Not sure what you’re going on about “Torahnism.” There is no “Torahnism” on college campuses. There is, however, rampant antisemitism where Jews are being assaulted, bullied, spit on, blocked from attended class, etc., etc., and the colleges are enabling it if not outright promoting it.
The question therefore was “isn’t it wrong for the government to give financial support to institutions enabling Jew-hate”?

Are yearn thoughts any on these responses herein ?

Are yearn thoughts any on nomian versus antinomian precepts of genetic religion ?

# response 1 one

" Instantiation Of Vernacular And Lexicon "
* Discerning Scopes Of Nomian Genetic Religion Versus Universality For Sectarian Supremacy *
The genetic religions of torahnism and qurayshism differ based on matriarchs , via a common eponymous patriarch of abraham , as ishmael was settled in paran , while isaac was settled in canaan .
The saheeh international translation of surah 9:111 states the following and clearly there is a difference between torahnism ( torah ) , qurayshism ( qurayn ) and antinomianism ( gospel ) , though there is not a directive to kill or be killed in the gospel :
Indeed, God has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān. And who is truer to his covenant than God? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

* Not Quibbling About Dealing Directly With Pretentious Scope For Universality Of Sectarian Supremacy By Fictional Ishmaelism *
A contemporary assertion of antisemitism is more accurately an account of racism against japhetic peoples who are seeking to implement a semitic and nomian genetic religion of torahnism .
A contemporary assertion of antisemitism is analogous with " white " peoples being targeted with hate for promoting rap music and claiming that the persecution received is based in racism against " black " peoples .

* Goading To Invoke By No Name Will A Law Be Made *
There has already been an scapegoat and martyr sacrificed for antinomianism , to rebuke lunar tick crazed hue mammon apes invoking nomian creed .
. Zone1 - Why Do Zealots Justify Violence Because Their Goad Will Not Do It ? .
. End of Debate Over Whether To Reconcile .

# response 2 two

" More Willing And Deserving To Have Sectarian Supremacy Of Fictional Ishmaelism Challenged "
* Edicts And Tenets For Violence Cannot Be Extricated From Doctrine *
When will the pretentious universality for fictional ishmaelism , by its sectarian supremacist adherents , that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz , be realized as a debase absurdity ?
The author of the qurayn named surah 47 after itself , wherein none are disguising expectations for a final solution :
47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.
Perhaps the first 26 seconds of the following video might explain it more clearly .

 

[JoeB131]

So you think that what he said was not out of belief but political maneuvering? Occam would cry.

I don't pretend he was a saint. He knew liberal Jews were writing his checks.

or you are being intentionally obtuse.

Not at all. I'm just immune to Zionist Propaganda.

Irrelevant -- the state was carved out of the same mandate with the same unilateral move. You object to one but not the other.

Well, no, not really. I was a case of an Empire trying to do colonialism by proxy.

The important thing to remember about Zionism is that it is the last gasp of a colonial regime. Zionism is a European ideology conceived in a time when colonialism was acceptable, when Rudyard Kipling was extolling white folks to take up "The White Man's Burden". Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews in the Islamic World (mostly driven there by the Spanish Inquisition) had no desire to settle in Palestine. It was the Ashekenazi Jews - the white boys - who thought, "Hey, other people are carving out colonies in the rest of the world, let's get in on some of that action!"

Way to shift the goal posts. You made a claim and I showed how, historically it is not true. So you run to a different argument. At least you are getting some good exercise running away.

Well, you are just making shit up. The reality is there were very few Jews living in Palestine before 1890. Muslims had them outnumbered 10-1. There were more CHRISTIANS living in Palestine than Jews at that time.

Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Even after the British stabbed their Arab allies in the back and started resettling European Jews there, they weren't too keen on doing that until Toothbrush Mustasche Man started exterminating them in Europe.

Now, the Holocaust was terrible. It was not an excuse to abuse the Muslims of Palestine.

I don’t know what JoeIB An Antisemite said, but from your responses I’m tempted to take a peek.

On second thought, he’s not worth it.

I'm living in your head rent-free regardless.

 

[rosends]

I don't pretend he was a saint. He knew liberal Jews were writing his checks.

so he was bought and paid for by the Jews?

Not at all. I'm just immune to Zionist Propaganda.

and facts, it seems.

The important thing to remember about Zionism is that it is the last gasp of a colonial regime.

that's silly as Zionism found expression with no relationship to the British Empire. Check the history.

It was the Ashekenazi Jews - the white boys - who thought, "Hey, other people are carving out colonies in the rest of the world, let's get in on some of that action!"

so you don't know the history of Judaism and didn't look at the timeline. Got it.

Well, you are just making shit up. The reality is there were very few Jews living in Palestine before 1890. Muslims had them outnumbered 10-1. There were more CHRISTIANS living in Palestine than Jews at that time.

Again, you shift the goal posts. You made a claim. I refuted it. Suck it up.

 

[JoeB131]

that's silly as Zionism found expression with no relationship to the British Empire. Check the history.

Balfour Declaration... Maybe you heard of it.

so you don't know the history of Judaism and didn't look at the timeline. Got it.

Sure I do. I just don't accept your version, which is based on myths and fairy tales.

Again, you shift the goal posts. You made a claim. I refuted it. Suck it up.

Um, no, I made a claim and backed it up. Ashekenazi colonialism of Palestine is a recent thing...and a dumb one.

and facts, it seems.

You guys make up your own facts, like Palestine was completely empty before you got there.

 

[rosends]

Balfour Declaration... Maybe you heard of it.

And I heard of a lot of stuff well earlier that had nothing to do with England. You should really study history.

Sure I do. I just don't accept your version, which is based on myths and fairy tales.

So the dates I presented (which are historical facts) are fairy tales? Way to dismiss something that proves you wrong.

Um, no, I made a claim and backed it up. Ashekenazi colonialism of Palestine is a recent thing...and a dumb one.

That's not what you said. I'll quote it for you because your memory seems as faulty as your grasp of history:
You wrote, "The Zionists are a bunch of Europeans, who had no interest in moving to Palestine before 1945"

Except that not only are "the Zionists" more than Europeans, but the interest in moving to the region of the mideast well predates 1945 (as shown by the link I provided). So you are wrong. Deal with it.

You guys make up your own facts, like Palestine was completely empty before you got there.

Did you know that Mark Twain wasn't a Jew?