When Justice Eludes…

[colfax_m]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

McCabe was fired for lying.

When's he going to jail????

Is there evidence to support an indictment? According to the grand jury, no.

Why was he fired?

Giving details of a story to the WSJ and not telling the truth of the matter to the IG. However, the burden of proof for firing him and getting a conviction are not the same.

 

[task0778]

DC Justice

Washington, D.C. has a relatively small population from which jurors must be found for the federal and local grand juries, petit juries, and civil juries. People who serve on these juries must be citizens with no felony convictions, people with no connection to the attorneys or parties, and must have no bias respecting the matter tried. Since almost 80% of the city are Democratic voters, often employed by the government or are connected to law enforcement or have family members who are, the ability to expeditiously find panels in criminal cases is limited. Worse yet, the chance of an unbiased panel in a case involving Republican figures is minimal. If you think this puts Republican figures at far greater risk than Democrats, you are certainly not wrong. Recall if you will the prosecutor who publicly stated the Starr special counsel’s office believed Hillary Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but because ethical prosecutors are not to bring cases they have no reasonable likelihood of winning and no D.C. jury would convict her, they were declining to prosecute her.

Potential jurors are given questionnaires to fill out under oath, on penalty of perjury, in an effort to determine any biases. After which they may be called still under oath in a process called voir dire to answer further questions from the judge and lawyers to determine if they should be excused or empaneled to sit on the jury. Prosecutors get to strike peremptorily six people from the jury and the defense gets to strike 10. In addition, on its own initiative, the court can strike any for cause.

Further:

Following the resignation of the prosecutors who were overruled, Tomeka Hart tweeted support for them and independent journalist Mike Cernovich searched her Twitter feeds, which revealed contrary to her statements at voir dire that she “didn’t pay that close attention” to the probe and that Stone’s connection to President Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of him, she had regularly commented on the collusion probe, demonstrated extreme bias against Trump and his supporters, all of whom she called racists, and immediately upon Stone’s conviction tweeted hearts and fist bumps. [Tomeka Hart was the foreperson in the Stone trial]

There are demands that the judge who heard the case, Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee whom many have contended displayed bias in the Manafort and other matters), now release all the questionnaires of the entire jury panel. Stone has filed a motion for a new trial (which Berman, who has a penchant for requiring secrecy in this proceeding) demanded be filed under seal.( Berman not only forbade Stone from publicly speaking out during the trial, she even filed a sealed contempt motion against a Gateway Pundit reporter for his work on the Stone jury selection process. He noted that the judge and prosecutors laughed off defense objections of potential jurors with Democratic party connections while she agreed with prosecutors to remove a potential juror who three decades earlier had a small role in the Reagan for President campaign.)

Jonathan Turley explains why Hart’s tweets are so troublesome for the judicial process:

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to bar witnesses due to their past political associations or viewpoints. This included a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget who admitted to having negative views of Trump and whose husband worked at the Justice Department division. [snip]

However, the social media postings of Hart raise troubling questions as to whether these views were known or disclosed. What is clear is that no defendant associated with Trump would want such a juror sitting in judgment. This included a posting about the Stone case where she retweeted mocking dismissals of objections to Stone’s treatment in a dawn raid. I was one of those raising such concerns. There is of course nothing wrong with holding the opposing view of that issue and Hart did nothing wrong in sitting on the jury absent some allegations of hiding or misrepresenting information.

Hart is a [D]emocratic activist who ran for Congress and referred to the President with a hashtag as “klanpresident.” More worrisome is her references directly to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, Bakari Sellers again raising racist associations and stating “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also called Trump supporters like Stone racists and Putin cronies. When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.”

She also, on March 24, 2019, shared a Facebook post calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/dc_law.html#ixzz6EDwIOAWu

According to former judge Andrew Napolitano, it is a crime to lie to congress or to mislead them. Stone is not the first nor will he be the last to do so, but being a Trump guy outweighs any crime or rule of law to a democrat, and DC is full of democrats. I do not know how Stone or anyone else who isn't a Lefty can expect impartial justice. I ain't saying that Stone is innocent, but equal treatment under the law should be required for every defendant and if DC that ain't happening. Too often it isn't a question of innocence or guilt, but which side are you on.

And I hope Tomeka Hart goes to jail for what she did.

 

[Ringtone]

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

It's not just in the government, but on the streets and college campuses everywhere as the video attests. Leftist activists have no sense of repercussions for their thuggish behavior because there seldom are any. Conservative students and activists are incessantly assaulted, their property destroyed, and the perpetrators go unpunished. At what point do conservatives and libertarians hit back?

.

Behold the disgusting faux female, feminazi dikes and skanks of the political left especially.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

Brennan, Clapper, McCabe and many others can lie to congress and not get prosecuted, but Stone gets names confused, Flynn gets setup by the FBI, Popadope and any Trump supporters get the book thrown at them. Its the double-standard that gets us outraged.
Look at the serious lie Stone told....
Roger Stone's Crimes
According to the Feb. 10 sentencing memo, Stone made at least five public statements from Aug. 8, 2016, to Aug. 18, 2016, that indicated he had a source connected to Assange. The committee asked Stone to name the person he was referring to in those early- to mid-August statements. Stone told the House committee it was radio host Randy Credico, who had interviewed Assange on Aug. 25, 2016.

But that was a lie, according to the evidence prosecutors presented at the trial, including Credico’s testimony.

“Stone and Credico did not even discuss Assange until August 19, 2016, when Credico told Stone that he was trying to book Assange on his radio show,” the Feb. 10 sentencing memo says.

Stone was actually referring to Jerome Corsi, a conservative author. “[T]he intermediary or backchannel that Stone referenced in his August 2016 public statements was Corsi,” the memo says.

On Aug. 2, 2016, Corsi told Stone in an email that WikiLeaks planned to release “very damaging” information about Clinton.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging.… Time to let more than [the Clinton Campaign chairman] to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton],” Corsi wrote in that email. “That appears to be the game hackers are now about.”

It was after exchanging this and other emails with Corsi in late July and early August that Stone began making “a series of public statements that he was in contact with Assange, and that he knew what information Assange was planning to release.”

Stone, for example, told an audience at an Aug. 8, 2016, event held by the Southwest Broward Republican Organization that he had “communicated with Assange.” Stone told the group, “I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but there’s no telling what the October surprise may be.”

Prosecutors also presented evidence that showed how Stone threatened and bullied Credico in an attempt to prevent him from testifying before the House committee and contradicting Stone’s earlier committee testimony. Credico testified that Stone threatened him and used references to the “Godfather” movies to pressure him not to talk to Congress, according to Politico’s account of the trial.

The evidence clearly shows that Stone didn't get "names confused", but lied in a deliberate attempt to delay and impede the investigation that would be potentially damaging to Trump.

It's not credible to think that Stone would forget he had been communicating to Corsi and not Credico and that he would simultaneously forget that he had extensive email and text message communications with both of them.

The evidence supports that these were deliberate lies. If similar facts were present in the case of Brennan, Clapper and McCabe, they would likely be indicted as well. So far there is no such evidence and therefore the facts of the matters and the strength of the case is entirely different. This only seems like a double standard if you are unaware of the facts.

Take the blinders off, dunce.

3. “…Democrat donors remaining in the Mueller lynch mob decided that Roger Stone, an absolutely harmless gadfly whose real crime was being aligned with Donald Trump and therefore with you, should be sent away for seven to nine years for “crimes” that the Department of Injustice promptly gave a pass on to the loathsome Andrew McCabe. This is the same institution that also gave a pass to Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, Comey the Looming Doofus, and those fugly FBI sexting twins.

You would not get a pass.

… it got worse as the garbage Stone conviction was revealed to have been obtained with an anti-Trump Democrat activist as the jury foreperson. Think about that – an active partisan on the jury. The judge – wanna guess who appointed her? – refused to dump this partisan off the jury because of course, a Democrat candidate for office could be neutral and how dare you question the integrity of the system harrumph harrumph harrumph.

…tell me, without bursting into laughter, that I am still supposed to respect our federal law enforcement institutions. I keep hearing about these wonderful keepers of norms and rules and stuff deserve our awe, and then I see the tawdry, self-serving and scummy way they operate, and gee – there’s a disconnect. A big one. If the price of our society is submitting to these corrupt and incompetent people of garbage, well, then I say burn it all down.

That’s the only way to save it: to level it and start over.”
Burn Down the DOJ and Start Over

The cancer in our government has been exposed.

It needs to be excised.

So are you saying that Stone did or didn't commit the crimes that he's been convicted of?

Here's what I'm saying, moron....


When Justice Eludes…

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

 

[PoliticalChic]

DC Justice

Washington, D.C. has a relatively small population from which jurors must be found for the federal and local grand juries, petit juries, and civil juries. People who serve on these juries must be citizens with no felony convictions, people with no connection to the attorneys or parties, and must have no bias respecting the matter tried. Since almost 80% of the city are Democratic voters, often employed by the government or are connected to law enforcement or have family members who are, the ability to expeditiously find panels in criminal cases is limited. Worse yet, the chance of an unbiased panel in a case involving Republican figures is minimal. If you think this puts Republican figures at far greater risk than Democrats, you are certainly not wrong. Recall if you will the prosecutor who publicly stated the Starr special counsel’s office believed Hillary Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but because ethical prosecutors are not to bring cases they have no reasonable likelihood of winning and no D.C. jury would convict her, they were declining to prosecute her.

Potential jurors are given questionnaires to fill out under oath, on penalty of perjury, in an effort to determine any biases. After which they may be called still under oath in a process called voir dire to answer further questions from the judge and lawyers to determine if they should be excused or empaneled to sit on the jury. Prosecutors get to strike peremptorily six people from the jury and the defense gets to strike 10. In addition, on its own initiative, the court can strike any for cause.

Further:

Following the resignation of the prosecutors who were overruled, Tomeka Hart tweeted support for them and independent journalist Mike Cernovich searched her Twitter feeds, which revealed contrary to her statements at voir dire that she “didn’t pay that close attention” to the probe and that Stone’s connection to President Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of him, she had regularly commented on the collusion probe, demonstrated extreme bias against Trump and his supporters, all of whom she called racists, and immediately upon Stone’s conviction tweeted hearts and fist bumps. [Tomeka Hart was the foreperson in the Stone trial]

There are demands that the judge who heard the case, Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee whom many have contended displayed bias in the Manafort and other matters), now release all the questionnaires of the entire jury panel. Stone has filed a motion for a new trial (which Berman, who has a penchant for requiring secrecy in this proceeding) demanded be filed under seal.( Berman not only forbade Stone from publicly speaking out during the trial, she even filed a sealed contempt motion against a Gateway Pundit reporter for his work on the Stone jury selection process. He noted that the judge and prosecutors laughed off defense objections of potential jurors with Democratic party connections while she agreed with prosecutors to remove a potential juror who three decades earlier had a small role in the Reagan for President campaign.)

Jonathan Turley explains why Hart’s tweets are so troublesome for the judicial process:

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to bar witnesses due to their past political associations or viewpoints. This included a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget who admitted to having negative views of Trump and whose husband worked at the Justice Department division. [snip]

However, the social media postings of Hart raise troubling questions as to whether these views were known or disclosed. What is clear is that no defendant associated with Trump would want such a juror sitting in judgment. This included a posting about the Stone case where she retweeted mocking dismissals of objections to Stone’s treatment in a dawn raid. I was one of those raising such concerns. There is of course nothing wrong with holding the opposing view of that issue and Hart did nothing wrong in sitting on the jury absent some allegations of hiding or misrepresenting information.

Hart is a [D]emocratic activist who ran for Congress and referred to the President with a hashtag as “klanpresident.” More worrisome is her references directly to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, Bakari Sellers again raising racist associations and stating “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also called Trump supporters like Stone racists and Putin cronies. When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.”

She also, on March 24, 2019, shared a Facebook post calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/dc_law.html#ixzz6EDwIOAWu

According to former judge Andrew Napolitano, it is a crime to lie to congress or to mislead them. Stone is not the first nor will he be the last to do so, but being a Trump guy outweighs any crime or rule of law to a democrat, and DC is full of democrats. I do not know how Stone or anyone else who isn't a Lefty can expect impartial justice. I ain't saying that Stone is innocent, but equal treatment under the law should be required for every defendant and if DC that ain't happening. Too often it isn't a question of innocence or guilt, but which side are you on.

And I hope Tomeka Hart goes to jail for what she did.

That was gonna be my item #8 in the thread.


Hope you don't mind if I repeat it later.

 

[bodecea]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

McCabe was fired for lying.

When's he going to jail????

What's the weather like in Moscow today?

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

It's not just in the government, but on the streets and college campuses everywhere as the video attests. Leftist activists have no sense of repercussions for their thuggish behavior because there seldom are any. Conservative students and activists are incessantly assaulted, their property destroyed, and the perpetrators go unpunished. At what point do conservatives and libertarians hit back?

.

Behold the disgusting faux female, feminazi dikes and skanks of the political left especially.

I was being specific for the purposes of this thread, but the major problem is the occupation of the school system by Liberals/Democrats.


The nation has no future unless we can pry the school system away from the Democrats the way earlier Republicans pried their slaves away from 'em.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

McCabe was fired for lying.

When's he going to jail????

Is there evidence to support an indictment? According to the grand jury, no.

Why was he fired?

Giving details of a story to the WSJ and not telling the truth of the matter to the IG. However, the burden of proof for firing him and getting a conviction are not the same.

Soooo.....you're a government school grad, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

McCabe was fired for lying.

When's he going to jail????

What's the weather like in Moscow today?

So you finally got the nerve up to actually go beyond emoticons.....and all you could manage to come up with is this??????


People might take you more seriously if you’d stop dressing as Carmen Miranda with that fruit bowl on your head.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7.“America’s Intelligence agencies are the deep state’s deepest part, and the most immediate threat to representative government. They are also not very good at what they are supposed to be doing. Protecting the Republic from them requires refocusing them on their proper jobs.

Intelligence officials abuse their positions to discredit opposition to the Democratic Party, of which they are part. Complicit with the media, they leverage the public’s mistaken faith in their superior knowledge, competence, and patriotism to vilify their domestic enemies from behind secrecy’s shield.”
Abolish CIA & FISA

If the Left could defeat the Right’s arguments……why would they need this corruption???

 

[task0778]

DC Justice

Washington, D.C. has a relatively small population from which jurors must be found for the federal and local grand juries, petit juries, and civil juries. People who serve on these juries must be citizens with no felony convictions, people with no connection to the attorneys or parties, and must have no bias respecting the matter tried. Since almost 80% of the city are Democratic voters, often employed by the government or are connected to law enforcement or have family members who are, the ability to expeditiously find panels in criminal cases is limited. Worse yet, the chance of an unbiased panel in a case involving Republican figures is minimal. If you think this puts Republican figures at far greater risk than Democrats, you are certainly not wrong. Recall if you will the prosecutor who publicly stated the Starr special counsel’s office believed Hillary Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but because ethical prosecutors are not to bring cases they have no reasonable likelihood of winning and no D.C. jury would convict her, they were declining to prosecute her.

Potential jurors are given questionnaires to fill out under oath, on penalty of perjury, in an effort to determine any biases. After which they may be called still under oath in a process called voir dire to answer further questions from the judge and lawyers to determine if they should be excused or empaneled to sit on the jury. Prosecutors get to strike peremptorily six people from the jury and the defense gets to strike 10. In addition, on its own initiative, the court can strike any for cause.

Further:

Following the resignation of the prosecutors who were overruled, Tomeka Hart tweeted support for them and independent journalist Mike Cernovich searched her Twitter feeds, which revealed contrary to her statements at voir dire that she “didn’t pay that close attention” to the probe and that Stone’s connection to President Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of him, she had regularly commented on the collusion probe, demonstrated extreme bias against Trump and his supporters, all of whom she called racists, and immediately upon Stone’s conviction tweeted hearts and fist bumps. [Tomeka Hart was the foreperson in the Stone trial]

There are demands that the judge who heard the case, Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee whom many have contended displayed bias in the Manafort and other matters), now release all the questionnaires of the entire jury panel. Stone has filed a motion for a new trial (which Berman, who has a penchant for requiring secrecy in this proceeding) demanded be filed under seal.( Berman not only forbade Stone from publicly speaking out during the trial, she even filed a sealed contempt motion against a Gateway Pundit reporter for his work on the Stone jury selection process. He noted that the judge and prosecutors laughed off defense objections of potential jurors with Democratic party connections while she agreed with prosecutors to remove a potential juror who three decades earlier had a small role in the Reagan for President campaign.)

Jonathan Turley explains why Hart’s tweets are so troublesome for the judicial process:

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to bar witnesses due to their past political associations or viewpoints. This included a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget who admitted to having negative views of Trump and whose husband worked at the Justice Department division. [snip]

However, the social media postings of Hart raise troubling questions as to whether these views were known or disclosed. What is clear is that no defendant associated with Trump would want such a juror sitting in judgment. This included a posting about the Stone case where she retweeted mocking dismissals of objections to Stone’s treatment in a dawn raid. I was one of those raising such concerns. There is of course nothing wrong with holding the opposing view of that issue and Hart did nothing wrong in sitting on the jury absent some allegations of hiding or misrepresenting information.

Hart is a [D]emocratic activist who ran for Congress and referred to the President with a hashtag as “klanpresident.” More worrisome is her references directly to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, Bakari Sellers again raising racist associations and stating “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also called Trump supporters like Stone racists and Putin cronies. When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.”

She also, on March 24, 2019, shared a Facebook post calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/dc_law.html#ixzz6EDwIOAWu

According to former judge Andrew Napolitano, it is a crime to lie to congress or to mislead them. Stone is not the first nor will he be the last to do so, but being a Trump guy outweighs any crime or rule of law to a democrat, and DC is full of democrats. I do not know how Stone or anyone else who isn't a Lefty can expect impartial justice. I ain't saying that Stone is innocent, but equal treatment under the law should be required for every defendant and if DC that ain't happening. Too often it isn't a question of innocence or guilt, but which side are you on.

And I hope Tomeka Hart goes to jail for what she did.

That was gonna be my item #8 in the thread.


Hope you don't mind if I repeat it later.

Don't mind at all, go for it. It's sad and depressing really, when you look at how many Dems broke the law and walked free vs how many Repubs go to jail for doing the same thing or less. I remember people saying oh, it's just the senior leadership, the regular rank and file are blameless. But a lot of those leadership guys are gone and we still have the corruption: Stone gets fucked and McCabe walks free. I think Barr has a humongous problem throughout the DOJ, and it's going to take awhile to set things right.
I'm hoping Durham's investigation results in a bunch of unethical and dirty pols going to prison, that would be a good start.

 

[PoliticalChic]

DC Justice

Washington, D.C. has a relatively small population from which jurors must be found for the federal and local grand juries, petit juries, and civil juries. People who serve on these juries must be citizens with no felony convictions, people with no connection to the attorneys or parties, and must have no bias respecting the matter tried. Since almost 80% of the city are Democratic voters, often employed by the government or are connected to law enforcement or have family members who are, the ability to expeditiously find panels in criminal cases is limited. Worse yet, the chance of an unbiased panel in a case involving Republican figures is minimal. If you think this puts Republican figures at far greater risk than Democrats, you are certainly not wrong. Recall if you will the prosecutor who publicly stated the Starr special counsel’s office believed Hillary Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but because ethical prosecutors are not to bring cases they have no reasonable likelihood of winning and no D.C. jury would convict her, they were declining to prosecute her.

Potential jurors are given questionnaires to fill out under oath, on penalty of perjury, in an effort to determine any biases. After which they may be called still under oath in a process called voir dire to answer further questions from the judge and lawyers to determine if they should be excused or empaneled to sit on the jury. Prosecutors get to strike peremptorily six people from the jury and the defense gets to strike 10. In addition, on its own initiative, the court can strike any for cause.

Further:

Following the resignation of the prosecutors who were overruled, Tomeka Hart tweeted support for them and independent journalist Mike Cernovich searched her Twitter feeds, which revealed contrary to her statements at voir dire that she “didn’t pay that close attention” to the probe and that Stone’s connection to President Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of him, she had regularly commented on the collusion probe, demonstrated extreme bias against Trump and his supporters, all of whom she called racists, and immediately upon Stone’s conviction tweeted hearts and fist bumps. [Tomeka Hart was the foreperson in the Stone trial]

There are demands that the judge who heard the case, Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee whom many have contended displayed bias in the Manafort and other matters), now release all the questionnaires of the entire jury panel. Stone has filed a motion for a new trial (which Berman, who has a penchant for requiring secrecy in this proceeding) demanded be filed under seal.( Berman not only forbade Stone from publicly speaking out during the trial, she even filed a sealed contempt motion against a Gateway Pundit reporter for his work on the Stone jury selection process. He noted that the judge and prosecutors laughed off defense objections of potential jurors with Democratic party connections while she agreed with prosecutors to remove a potential juror who three decades earlier had a small role in the Reagan for President campaign.)

Jonathan Turley explains why Hart’s tweets are so troublesome for the judicial process:

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to bar witnesses due to their past political associations or viewpoints. This included a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget who admitted to having negative views of Trump and whose husband worked at the Justice Department division. [snip]

However, the social media postings of Hart raise troubling questions as to whether these views were known or disclosed. What is clear is that no defendant associated with Trump would want such a juror sitting in judgment. This included a posting about the Stone case where she retweeted mocking dismissals of objections to Stone’s treatment in a dawn raid. I was one of those raising such concerns. There is of course nothing wrong with holding the opposing view of that issue and Hart did nothing wrong in sitting on the jury absent some allegations of hiding or misrepresenting information.

Hart is a [D]emocratic activist who ran for Congress and referred to the President with a hashtag as “klanpresident.” More worrisome is her references directly to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, Bakari Sellers again raising racist associations and stating “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also called Trump supporters like Stone racists and Putin cronies. When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.”

She also, on March 24, 2019, shared a Facebook post calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/dc_law.html#ixzz6EDwIOAWu

According to former judge Andrew Napolitano, it is a crime to lie to congress or to mislead them. Stone is not the first nor will he be the last to do so, but being a Trump guy outweighs any crime or rule of law to a democrat, and DC is full of democrats. I do not know how Stone or anyone else who isn't a Lefty can expect impartial justice. I ain't saying that Stone is innocent, but equal treatment under the law should be required for every defendant and if DC that ain't happening. Too often it isn't a question of innocence or guilt, but which side are you on.

And I hope Tomeka Hart goes to jail for what she did.

That was gonna be my item #8 in the thread.


Hope you don't mind if I repeat it later.

Don't mind at all, go for it. It's sad and depressing really, when you look at how many Dems broke the law and walked free vs how many Repubs go to jail for doing the same thing or less. I remember people saying oh, it's just the senior leadership, the regular rank and file are blameless. But a lot of those leadership guys are gone and we still have the corruption: Stone gets fucked and McCabe walks free. I think Barr has a humongous problem throughout the DOJ, and it's going to take awhile to set things right.
I'm hoping Durham's investigation results in a bunch of unethical and dirty pols going to prison, that would be a good start.

My point exactly......but I'm not getting my hopes up even for Durham.....


Do you see the government school grads ignoring and defending the corruption?


It's the end of America.

 

[task0778]

DC Justice

Washington, D.C. has a relatively small population from which jurors must be found for the federal and local grand juries, petit juries, and civil juries. People who serve on these juries must be citizens with no felony convictions, people with no connection to the attorneys or parties, and must have no bias respecting the matter tried. Since almost 80% of the city are Democratic voters, often employed by the government or are connected to law enforcement or have family members who are, the ability to expeditiously find panels in criminal cases is limited. Worse yet, the chance of an unbiased panel in a case involving Republican figures is minimal. If you think this puts Republican figures at far greater risk than Democrats, you are certainly not wrong. Recall if you will the prosecutor who publicly stated the Starr special counsel’s office believed Hillary Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but because ethical prosecutors are not to bring cases they have no reasonable likelihood of winning and no D.C. jury would convict her, they were declining to prosecute her.

Potential jurors are given questionnaires to fill out under oath, on penalty of perjury, in an effort to determine any biases. After which they may be called still under oath in a process called voir dire to answer further questions from the judge and lawyers to determine if they should be excused or empaneled to sit on the jury. Prosecutors get to strike peremptorily six people from the jury and the defense gets to strike 10. In addition, on its own initiative, the court can strike any for cause.

Further:

Following the resignation of the prosecutors who were overruled, Tomeka Hart tweeted support for them and independent journalist Mike Cernovich searched her Twitter feeds, which revealed contrary to her statements at voir dire that she “didn’t pay that close attention” to the probe and that Stone’s connection to President Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of him, she had regularly commented on the collusion probe, demonstrated extreme bias against Trump and his supporters, all of whom she called racists, and immediately upon Stone’s conviction tweeted hearts and fist bumps. [Tomeka Hart was the foreperson in the Stone trial]

There are demands that the judge who heard the case, Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee whom many have contended displayed bias in the Manafort and other matters), now release all the questionnaires of the entire jury panel. Stone has filed a motion for a new trial (which Berman, who has a penchant for requiring secrecy in this proceeding) demanded be filed under seal.( Berman not only forbade Stone from publicly speaking out during the trial, she even filed a sealed contempt motion against a Gateway Pundit reporter for his work on the Stone jury selection process. He noted that the judge and prosecutors laughed off defense objections of potential jurors with Democratic party connections while she agreed with prosecutors to remove a potential juror who three decades earlier had a small role in the Reagan for President campaign.)

Jonathan Turley explains why Hart’s tweets are so troublesome for the judicial process:

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to bar witnesses due to their past political associations or viewpoints. This included a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget who admitted to having negative views of Trump and whose husband worked at the Justice Department division. [snip]

However, the social media postings of Hart raise troubling questions as to whether these views were known or disclosed. What is clear is that no defendant associated with Trump would want such a juror sitting in judgment. This included a posting about the Stone case where she retweeted mocking dismissals of objections to Stone’s treatment in a dawn raid. I was one of those raising such concerns. There is of course nothing wrong with holding the opposing view of that issue and Hart did nothing wrong in sitting on the jury absent some allegations of hiding or misrepresenting information.

Hart is a [D]emocratic activist who ran for Congress and referred to the President with a hashtag as “klanpresident.” More worrisome is her references directly to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, Bakari Sellers again raising racist associations and stating “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also called Trump supporters like Stone racists and Putin cronies. When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.”

She also, on March 24, 2019, shared a Facebook post calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/dc_law.html#ixzz6EDwIOAWu

According to former judge Andrew Napolitano, it is a crime to lie to congress or to mislead them. Stone is not the first nor will he be the last to do so, but being a Trump guy outweighs any crime or rule of law to a democrat, and DC is full of democrats. I do not know how Stone or anyone else who isn't a Lefty can expect impartial justice. I ain't saying that Stone is innocent, but equal treatment under the law should be required for every defendant and if DC that ain't happening. Too often it isn't a question of innocence or guilt, but which side are you on.

And I hope Tomeka Hart goes to jail for what she did.

That was gonna be my item #8 in the thread.


Hope you don't mind if I repeat it later.

Don't mind at all, go for it. It's sad and depressing really, when you look at how many Dems broke the law and walked free vs how many Repubs go to jail for doing the same thing or less. I remember people saying oh, it's just the senior leadership, the regular rank and file are blameless. But a lot of those leadership guys are gone and we still have the corruption: Stone gets fucked and McCabe walks free. I think Barr has a humongous problem throughout the DOJ, and it's going to take awhile to set things right.
I'm hoping Durham's investigation results in a bunch of unethical and dirty pols going to prison, that would be a good start.

My point exactly......but I'm not getting my hopes up even for Durham.....


Do you see the government school grads ignoring and defending the corruption?


It's the end of America.

It feels like it. Those kids are in for a huge surprise if they ever get what they're asking for. Which I think they will at some point.

 

[colfax_m]

Maybe if Roger Stone didn't want to go to jail, he shouldn't have lied under oath?

Brennan, Clapper, McCabe and many others can lie to congress and not get prosecuted, but Stone gets names confused, Flynn gets setup by the FBI, Popadope and any Trump supporters get the book thrown at them. Its the double-standard that gets us outraged.
Look at the serious lie Stone told....
Roger Stone's Crimes
According to the Feb. 10 sentencing memo, Stone made at least five public statements from Aug. 8, 2016, to Aug. 18, 2016, that indicated he had a source connected to Assange. The committee asked Stone to name the person he was referring to in those early- to mid-August statements. Stone told the House committee it was radio host Randy Credico, who had interviewed Assange on Aug. 25, 2016.

But that was a lie, according to the evidence prosecutors presented at the trial, including Credico’s testimony.

“Stone and Credico did not even discuss Assange until August 19, 2016, when Credico told Stone that he was trying to book Assange on his radio show,” the Feb. 10 sentencing memo says.

Stone was actually referring to Jerome Corsi, a conservative author. “[T]he intermediary or backchannel that Stone referenced in his August 2016 public statements was Corsi,” the memo says.

On Aug. 2, 2016, Corsi told Stone in an email that WikiLeaks planned to release “very damaging” information about Clinton.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging.… Time to let more than [the Clinton Campaign chairman] to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton],” Corsi wrote in that email. “That appears to be the game hackers are now about.”

It was after exchanging this and other emails with Corsi in late July and early August that Stone began making “a series of public statements that he was in contact with Assange, and that he knew what information Assange was planning to release.”

Stone, for example, told an audience at an Aug. 8, 2016, event held by the Southwest Broward Republican Organization that he had “communicated with Assange.” Stone told the group, “I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but there’s no telling what the October surprise may be.”

Prosecutors also presented evidence that showed how Stone threatened and bullied Credico in an attempt to prevent him from testifying before the House committee and contradicting Stone’s earlier committee testimony. Credico testified that Stone threatened him and used references to the “Godfather” movies to pressure him not to talk to Congress, according to Politico’s account of the trial.

The evidence clearly shows that Stone didn't get "names confused", but lied in a deliberate attempt to delay and impede the investigation that would be potentially damaging to Trump.

It's not credible to think that Stone would forget he had been communicating to Corsi and not Credico and that he would simultaneously forget that he had extensive email and text message communications with both of them.

The evidence supports that these were deliberate lies. If similar facts were present in the case of Brennan, Clapper and McCabe, they would likely be indicted as well. So far there is no such evidence and therefore the facts of the matters and the strength of the case is entirely different. This only seems like a double standard if you are unaware of the facts.

Take the blinders off, dunce.

3. “…Democrat donors remaining in the Mueller lynch mob decided that Roger Stone, an absolutely harmless gadfly whose real crime was being aligned with Donald Trump and therefore with you, should be sent away for seven to nine years for “crimes” that the Department of Injustice promptly gave a pass on to the loathsome Andrew McCabe. This is the same institution that also gave a pass to Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, Comey the Looming Doofus, and those fugly FBI sexting twins.

You would not get a pass.

… it got worse as the garbage Stone conviction was revealed to have been obtained with an anti-Trump Democrat activist as the jury foreperson. Think about that – an active partisan on the jury. The judge – wanna guess who appointed her? – refused to dump this partisan off the jury because of course, a Democrat candidate for office could be neutral and how dare you question the integrity of the system harrumph harrumph harrumph.

…tell me, without bursting into laughter, that I am still supposed to respect our federal law enforcement institutions. I keep hearing about these wonderful keepers of norms and rules and stuff deserve our awe, and then I see the tawdry, self-serving and scummy way they operate, and gee – there’s a disconnect. A big one. If the price of our society is submitting to these corrupt and incompetent people of garbage, well, then I say burn it all down.

That’s the only way to save it: to level it and start over.”
Burn Down the DOJ and Start Over

The cancer in our government has been exposed.

It needs to be excised.

So are you saying that Stone did or didn't commit the crimes that he's been convicted of?

Here's what I'm saying, moron....


When Justice Eludes…

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

Nothing in your copy and paste analyzes the differences between the case against McCabe and the case against Stone. Are you under impression they’re somehow equal?

The point being, they aren’t. McCabe’s case was quite weak. Stone’s case was a slam dunk.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Brennan, Clapper, McCabe and many others can lie to congress and not get prosecuted, but Stone gets names confused, Flynn gets setup by the FBI, Popadope and any Trump supporters get the book thrown at them. Its the double-standard that gets us outraged.
Look at the serious lie Stone told....
Roger Stone's Crimes
According to the Feb. 10 sentencing memo, Stone made at least five public statements from Aug. 8, 2016, to Aug. 18, 2016, that indicated he had a source connected to Assange. The committee asked Stone to name the person he was referring to in those early- to mid-August statements. Stone told the House committee it was radio host Randy Credico, who had interviewed Assange on Aug. 25, 2016.

But that was a lie, according to the evidence prosecutors presented at the trial, including Credico’s testimony.

“Stone and Credico did not even discuss Assange until August 19, 2016, when Credico told Stone that he was trying to book Assange on his radio show,” the Feb. 10 sentencing memo says.

Stone was actually referring to Jerome Corsi, a conservative author. “[T]he intermediary or backchannel that Stone referenced in his August 2016 public statements was Corsi,” the memo says.

On Aug. 2, 2016, Corsi told Stone in an email that WikiLeaks planned to release “very damaging” information about Clinton.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging.… Time to let more than [the Clinton Campaign chairman] to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton],” Corsi wrote in that email. “That appears to be the game hackers are now about.”

It was after exchanging this and other emails with Corsi in late July and early August that Stone began making “a series of public statements that he was in contact with Assange, and that he knew what information Assange was planning to release.”

Stone, for example, told an audience at an Aug. 8, 2016, event held by the Southwest Broward Republican Organization that he had “communicated with Assange.” Stone told the group, “I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but there’s no telling what the October surprise may be.”

Prosecutors also presented evidence that showed how Stone threatened and bullied Credico in an attempt to prevent him from testifying before the House committee and contradicting Stone’s earlier committee testimony. Credico testified that Stone threatened him and used references to the “Godfather” movies to pressure him not to talk to Congress, according to Politico’s account of the trial.

The evidence clearly shows that Stone didn't get "names confused", but lied in a deliberate attempt to delay and impede the investigation that would be potentially damaging to Trump.

It's not credible to think that Stone would forget he had been communicating to Corsi and not Credico and that he would simultaneously forget that he had extensive email and text message communications with both of them.

The evidence supports that these were deliberate lies. If similar facts were present in the case of Brennan, Clapper and McCabe, they would likely be indicted as well. So far there is no such evidence and therefore the facts of the matters and the strength of the case is entirely different. This only seems like a double standard if you are unaware of the facts.

Take the blinders off, dunce.

3. “…Democrat donors remaining in the Mueller lynch mob decided that Roger Stone, an absolutely harmless gadfly whose real crime was being aligned with Donald Trump and therefore with you, should be sent away for seven to nine years for “crimes” that the Department of Injustice promptly gave a pass on to the loathsome Andrew McCabe. This is the same institution that also gave a pass to Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, Comey the Looming Doofus, and those fugly FBI sexting twins.

You would not get a pass.

… it got worse as the garbage Stone conviction was revealed to have been obtained with an anti-Trump Democrat activist as the jury foreperson. Think about that – an active partisan on the jury. The judge – wanna guess who appointed her? – refused to dump this partisan off the jury because of course, a Democrat candidate for office could be neutral and how dare you question the integrity of the system harrumph harrumph harrumph.

…tell me, without bursting into laughter, that I am still supposed to respect our federal law enforcement institutions. I keep hearing about these wonderful keepers of norms and rules and stuff deserve our awe, and then I see the tawdry, self-serving and scummy way they operate, and gee – there’s a disconnect. A big one. If the price of our society is submitting to these corrupt and incompetent people of garbage, well, then I say burn it all down.

That’s the only way to save it: to level it and start over.”
Burn Down the DOJ and Start Over

The cancer in our government has been exposed.

It needs to be excised.

So are you saying that Stone did or didn't commit the crimes that he's been convicted of?

Here's what I'm saying, moron....


When Justice Eludes…

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

Nothing in your copy and paste analyzes the differences between the case against McCabe and the case against Stone. Are you under impression they’re somehow equal?

The point being, they aren’t. McCabe’s case was quite weak. Stone’s case was a slam dunk.

Why are you back....guilt?


You're already on the record as being opposed to justice, and equality before the law.


Now...get back under the rock.

 

[colfax_m]

The evidence clearly shows that Stone didn't get "names confused", but lied in a deliberate attempt to delay and impede the investigation that would be potentially damaging to Trump.

It's not credible to think that Stone would forget he had been communicating to Corsi and not Credico and that he would simultaneously forget that he had extensive email and text message communications with both of them.

The evidence supports that these were deliberate lies. If similar facts were present in the case of Brennan, Clapper and McCabe, they would likely be indicted as well. So far there is no such evidence and therefore the facts of the matters and the strength of the case is entirely different. This only seems like a double standard if you are unaware of the facts.

Take the blinders off, dunce.

3. “…Democrat donors remaining in the Mueller lynch mob decided that Roger Stone, an absolutely harmless gadfly whose real crime was being aligned with Donald Trump and therefore with you, should be sent away for seven to nine years for “crimes” that the Department of Injustice promptly gave a pass on to the loathsome Andrew McCabe. This is the same institution that also gave a pass to Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, Comey the Looming Doofus, and those fugly FBI sexting twins.

You would not get a pass.

… it got worse as the garbage Stone conviction was revealed to have been obtained with an anti-Trump Democrat activist as the jury foreperson. Think about that – an active partisan on the jury. The judge – wanna guess who appointed her? – refused to dump this partisan off the jury because of course, a Democrat candidate for office could be neutral and how dare you question the integrity of the system harrumph harrumph harrumph.

…tell me, without bursting into laughter, that I am still supposed to respect our federal law enforcement institutions. I keep hearing about these wonderful keepers of norms and rules and stuff deserve our awe, and then I see the tawdry, self-serving and scummy way they operate, and gee – there’s a disconnect. A big one. If the price of our society is submitting to these corrupt and incompetent people of garbage, well, then I say burn it all down.

That’s the only way to save it: to level it and start over.”
Burn Down the DOJ and Start Over

The cancer in our government has been exposed.

It needs to be excised.

So are you saying that Stone did or didn't commit the crimes that he's been convicted of?

Here's what I'm saying, moron....


When Justice Eludes…

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

Nothing in your copy and paste analyzes the differences between the case against McCabe and the case against Stone. Are you under impression they’re somehow equal?

The point being, they aren’t. McCabe’s case was quite weak. Stone’s case was a slam dunk.

Why are you back....guilt?


You're already on the record as being opposed to justice, and equality before the law.

Now...get back under the rock.

Are you under the impression that these cases are somehow equal?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Take the blinders off, dunce.

3. “…Democrat donors remaining in the Mueller lynch mob decided that Roger Stone, an absolutely harmless gadfly whose real crime was being aligned with Donald Trump and therefore with you, should be sent away for seven to nine years for “crimes” that the Department of Injustice promptly gave a pass on to the loathsome Andrew McCabe. This is the same institution that also gave a pass to Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, Comey the Looming Doofus, and those fugly FBI sexting twins.

You would not get a pass.

… it got worse as the garbage Stone conviction was revealed to have been obtained with an anti-Trump Democrat activist as the jury foreperson. Think about that – an active partisan on the jury. The judge – wanna guess who appointed her? – refused to dump this partisan off the jury because of course, a Democrat candidate for office could be neutral and how dare you question the integrity of the system harrumph harrumph harrumph.

…tell me, without bursting into laughter, that I am still supposed to respect our federal law enforcement institutions. I keep hearing about these wonderful keepers of norms and rules and stuff deserve our awe, and then I see the tawdry, self-serving and scummy way they operate, and gee – there’s a disconnect. A big one. If the price of our society is submitting to these corrupt and incompetent people of garbage, well, then I say burn it all down.

That’s the only way to save it: to level it and start over.”
Burn Down the DOJ and Start Over

The cancer in our government has been exposed.

It needs to be excised.

So are you saying that Stone did or didn't commit the crimes that he's been convicted of?

Here's what I'm saying, moron....


When Justice Eludes…

…or, just the way the Democrats like it!



1.It takes a certain level of mind-numbed robot, the bottom the barrel type, to have lived through the last three years, yet still deny the existence of the Deep State, and its special definition of 'justice.'

“…questions regarding the sentencing of political operative Roger Stone. Last January, he was subjected to a pre-dawn raid by federal officials carrying assault rifles….[but] former Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, no longer must worry about being prosecuted. On Friday, a questionable decision was made not to issue any charges and drop the investigation into McCabe,…” The Deep State Wins Again at the DOJ

It’s a two-tiered system: jail for Republicans, CNN anchor jobs for Democrats.



2. “This was not a banner week for the idea that justice is alive and blind in America.

Three separate stories converged to drive home the obvious truth that America has a two-tiered justice system: the Justice Department's decision to not indict the guilty-as-sin plotter Andrew McCabe, the attempt to give Roger Stone an outrageous jail sentence, and the Army's decision to shrug that one of its officers attempted to orchestrate the removal of his commander-in-chief.

Even in the unlikely scenario that the Barr-Durham investigations send the full stable of coup-plotters to jail for decades, it will not erase the obvious fact that it pays to be a Democrat if you are going to commit crimes, particularly if they are political.


The most obvious reason is that the entire federal bureaucracy is one giant Democrat machine. This cannot be repeated enough. Nearly every member of almost every single department is a Democrat.

How bad is it? Back in 2016, 95 percent of campaign contributions for the presidential race went to Her Royal Awfulness. The Justice Department overachieved, coming in at 97 percent.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html




“Every effort needs to be made to break the corrupt Democrat triumvirate of government, media, and academia. America's future depends on it.

In the meantime, Americans will continue to live under a two-tiered justice system, which will breed far more righteous anger. That fury is building toward a dangerous boiling point.”
Ibid


But Americans are catching on....and don't like it.
An observer might be led to believe that this building anger is the price for another four years of Trump.

Nothing in your copy and paste analyzes the differences between the case against McCabe and the case against Stone. Are you under impression they’re somehow equal?

The point being, they aren’t. McCabe’s case was quite weak. Stone’s case was a slam dunk.

Why are you back....guilt?


You're already on the record as being opposed to justice, and equality before the law.

Now...get back under the rock.

Are you under the impression that these cases are somehow equal?

'EQUAL??????'

Doesn't the work 'equal' stick in your craw?????


Let's go over what Democrats imagine (I almost said 'think') equal means:


1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele


2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers

3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates

4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.

5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass

6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.

7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same

8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’

9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign

10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.

11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....


12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…

Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.

The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.

13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.

In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


14. And in another stunning revelation, the memo asserts that Justice Department official Bruce Ohr was used to pass information from the author of the dossier, Christopher Steele, to the DOJ.
Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, worked at the time for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm research firm that commissioned the dossier. Bruce Ohr, who worked closely with Deputy Attorney Generals Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein, passed his wife’s opposition research on Trump to the FBI, the memo says.


15. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.

Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.

16. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.

17. The memo also says that the FBI’s deputy director, Andrew McCabe, told Congress that a FISA warrant against the campaign adviser, Carter Page, would not have been granted without use of the dossier. That despite the FBI later determining that very little of the Democrat-funded document was corroborated


18. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..

19..The memo notes that the Papadopoulos information “triggered” the FBI investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion.
It says that there is no evidence that Page and Papadopoulos engaged in a conspiracy. “
Spy Warrant Granted Based On Dossier And News Stories Planted By Fusion GPS



…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….

…completely different treatment.

20. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.




Oh....and this:

Roger Stone gets a life sentence for being an ally of Trump, and Comey and McCabe get to be cable TV idols.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. If one expected justice in the morass of Washington, DC….I didn’t….one misunderstands what has been programmed into Democrat voters, via government school. Try to indict a McCabe, and this is what one is faced with:

“…should an investigator ever get to the point to where he is ready to indict a Beltway Democrat, the problem of geography rears its ugly head. There is the old saying that you can indict a ham sandwich. In Washington, D.C., that's not entirely true. If a prosecutor is seeking justice against a Democrat for a political crime, that had better be one horrible sandwich smeared with overwhelming evidence of the most heinous type. Because the jurors and the judges are also going to largely be sympathetic Democrats. A hardcore anti-Trump social media–posting partisan as foreperson of the Stone jury? U.S. district judge Amy Berman Jackson seemed to think this was a swell idea.” https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/twotiered_justice_system_on_full_display.html

Guess who appointed Judge Jackson.

Yup.




Angelo Codevilla has his usual sage advice for the country: “Abolish the CIA and FISA”
Abolish CIA & FISA

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. Since November 2016 the nation has been witness to the depredations of the Deep State, mostly Democrats, and Codevilla explains how they’ve been able to get away with same.


“Pretenses of superior knowledge have always tempted the Administrative State’s officials to manipulate or override voters.

…only the Intelligence agencies have the power to do that while claiming that scrutiny of their pretenses endangers national security. They have succeeded in restricting information about their misdeeds by “classifying” them under the Espionage Act of 1921. Thus covered, they misrepresent their opinions as knowledge and their preferences as logic. Thus acting as irresponsible arbiters of truth at the highest levels of American public life, they are the foremost jaws of the ruling class vise that is squeezing self-rule out of America.

• CIA is obsolete. Cables show agents’ intelligence takes are inferior to diplomats’. Agent networks are unprotected by counterintelligence. FBI success at counterintelligence ended when the Bureau was politicized and bureaucratized in the 1970s. CIA bottlenecks and incompetently controls strategic intelligence, while the Army and Marines show demonstrable tactical superiority.
• As a result, CIA is ideologically partisan. Its strength is in leading or joining domestic campaigns to influence public opinion. FBI has followed suit.” Abolish CIA & FISA

Remember the lie about 'all the intel agencies' blamed Russia?

"....Ray McGovern, an intelligence analyst for nearly three decades and formerly chief of the CIA’s Soviet Foreign Policy Branch.... calls it a disgrace to the intelligence profession. It is spotlessly free of evidence, front to back, pertaining to any events in which Russia is implicated. James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, admitted in May that “hand-picked” analysts from three agencies (not the 17 previously reported) drafted the ICA."
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. “Until the 1960s, the FBI’s focus on investigating violations of statutes, and the “cop mentality” with which it dealt with national security issues, limited its interference in politics to gathering bits of dirt on politicians. By the 1970s, however, the FBI was joining CIA in supporting the causes and prejudices of its political homologues.


Today these Agencies’ naked threat to the president of the United States, conveyed by the opposition party’s leader, shows a power grab so big that, unless crushed, it puts them on the path trod by the Roman Empire’s Praetorian guard. Like the Roman Emperor’s supposed guardians, they claim to protect the City. But, as Attorney General William Barr noted, they have come to identify “the national interest with their own political preferences,” feeling that “anyone who has a different opinion” is somehow “an enemy of the state.” They now support their party in seizing power, “[convincing] themselves that what they’re doing is in the higher interest, the better good.

In short, CIA and FBI have become instruments of partisan power.”
Abolish CIA & FISA