When Hillary Won the 2016 Election

Bush92

GHBush1992
May 23, 2014
34,808
10,730
1,400
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized and don't say obamacare. That was a gift to private insurance companies
Our entire society and the media. PC is just mind control by another name. The expectation of people that Big Brother in Washington DC must provide for me.
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
Yep. Hillary is love. Lol. Proles will follow.
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized and don't say obamacare. That was a gift to private insurance companies
Our entire society and the media. PC is just mind control by another name. The expectation of people that Big Brother in Washington DC must provide for me.
The media was privatized just like everything else. Clinton deregulated the media in 1997 and 6 corporations gobbled up 90% of the media.

They are public airwaves. Do you understand that?

Today the news room has to ask the CEO if it's OK to run a story. If it's about BP or bush lying us into Iraq they say no. But feel free to talk about God gays guns and racism all you want
 
"socialization" is a throwaway phrase for "everything I don't like but really can't tell you why I don't like it."

The terms "marxist" and "marxism" and "nazi" and "communism" and etc all fit into the same lack of language by the alt right.
 
What has been socialized and don't say obamacare. That was a gift to private insurance companies

That was probably the intention, but the evidence indicates it has been a disaster for many insurance companies as they get hit with massive loses. The motivation might have been the eventual consolidation of insurance companies into one or two giant too big to fail companies, all at the expense of American citizens who actually have a job. I would not characterize Crooked Hillary/Obama/democrat policy as socialism since it is really a sneaky, anti-American neoconism.
 
What has been socialized and don't say obamacare. That was a gift to private insurance companies

That was probably the intention, but the evidence indicates it has been a disaster for many insurance companies as they get hit with massive loses. The motivation might have been the eventual consolidation of insurance companies into one or two giant too big to fail companies, all at the expense of American citizens who actually have a job. I would not characterize Crooked Hillary/Obama/democrat policy as socialism since it is really a sneaky, anti-American neoconism.
I noted that you referred to "crooked" Hillary. You sound like a parrot of Donald Trump. Do you ever think for yourself, offer your own opinions, or does trump just speak for you
 
Wrong as usual.
She won the 2016 election when Rubio was knocked out of the race and Kasich didn't rise to the occassion. Of the GOP clown car, they had several candidates that could have beat her. When I say could have, I'm talking a Bush v. Gore matter of closeness. These are skilled politicians with something Ms. Clinton sorely lacks: political instincts.

The longer I live, the more I am convinced that political instincts are something you either have or do not. To say the right thing at the right time, unrehearsed is a blessing few have. To say the wrong thing at the wrong time (i.e. "that makes me smart") is something in abundance because what sounds good in your head isn't what sounds good repeated 5,000 times. Of Rubio, Kasich, Jeb Bush, and Scott Walker, you would have had a close race that could have gone either way. Rubio and Kasich would have likely won their home state which is more than Trump is doing with FL or OH it seems (much less NY). Bush would have won Florida. Not sure if Walker would have carried Wisconsin but there is little reason to think it wouldn't have been on the table like it is now. So electorally alone any of the four are a net win over Trump.

One can easily see any of the four being competitive in all of the swing states except for VA (Kaine, government base--no longer a swinger). I mean, how much would you give right now to see Marco or Scott Walker chunking footballs around the OSU stadium to some like-minded alum there to illustrate the contrast between HRC and themselves? Trump is actually older than HRC!!! Kasich would have played well out west as would have Rubio. Of the four, I think Jeb would have had the hardest time out west as he doesn't seem to have much "fire in the belly" for the race. I can see Rubio and his family skiing in Taos or Santa Fe.

None would have flipped the traditional blue states. But I can see FL, NC, OH, WI, NM, CO, AND NV in play with any of those four. Trump has gone out of his way to alienate peole in ever demogrpahic because he has no political instincts. Whatsmore is that it was very hard to cast yourself as an outsider when you were "paying to play" most of your adult life. Its sort of like the GM of a Baseball Team making the case that he should become Commissioner because he was never a player or a manger and, therefore, he could bring a fresh perspective to the game; like encouraging teams to have more American players on the team by awarding native born batters 4 strikes per at bat instead of 3.

I'm sure the OP has a koo koo for cocoa puffs idea of what happened, that there is some cabal of ruthless bleeding heart liberals hell bent on world domination that annointed Hillary as President. It's as stupid as it is non-sensical. HRC won because she ran a superior campaign. Trump lost beacause he ran an inferior campaign.

It really is that simple.
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
Whatever dude. Ultimately I probably agree but ultimately Republicans are anti public schools, specifically spreading out the money evenly so that poor communities get the same education we get out in the burbs.

But ultimately if you live in a poor neighborhood the experience will never be equal because the parents are uneducated and poor and had no business having kids in the first place.

This is an issue I might agree with you on. Lol
 
Clinton Concedes Democratic Nomination
The day she conceded in 2008. Socialist establishment, liberal media, and college campus professoriate were determined to have 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Clinton to complete the socialist takeover of our nation.
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
Whatever dude. Ultimately I probably agree but ultimately Republicans are anti public schools, specifically spreading out the money evenly so that poor communities get the same education we get out in the burbs.

But ultimately if you live in a poor neighborhood the experience will never be equal because the parents are uneducated and poor and had no business having kids in the first place.

This is an issue I might agree with you on. Lol

You will never get the same education in the inner cities as in the suburbs, because the most qualified teachers have no interest in teaching there.
 
What has been socialized

The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
Whatever dude. Ultimately I probably agree but ultimately Republicans are anti public schools, specifically spreading out the money evenly so that poor communities get the same education we get out in the burbs.

But ultimately if you live in a poor neighborhood the experience will never be equal because the parents are uneducated and poor and had no business having kids in the first place.

This is an issue I might agree with you on. Lol

You will never get the same education in the inner cities as in the suburbs, because the most qualified teachers have no interest in teaching there.
In Michigan they have a student loan forgiveness if you teach in a high-poverty low income area for teachers.
 
The minds of two generations tainted by the ever-increasingly socialist public education system.
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
Whatever dude. Ultimately I probably agree but ultimately Republicans are anti public schools, specifically spreading out the money evenly so that poor communities get the same education we get out in the burbs.

But ultimately if you live in a poor neighborhood the experience will never be equal because the parents are uneducated and poor and had no business having kids in the first place.

This is an issue I might agree with you on. Lol

You will never get the same education in the inner cities as in the suburbs, because the most qualified teachers have no interest in teaching there.
In Michigan they have a student loan forgiveness if you teach in a high-poverty low income area for teachers.

That's great. How many takers?
 
You're against public schools? Wow

I am for public education. I am against the diminishment of academic achievement in favor of political and multicultural indoctrination.
Whatever dude. Ultimately I probably agree but ultimately Republicans are anti public schools, specifically spreading out the money evenly so that poor communities get the same education we get out in the burbs.

But ultimately if you live in a poor neighborhood the experience will never be equal because the parents are uneducated and poor and had no business having kids in the first place.

This is an issue I might agree with you on. Lol

You will never get the same education in the inner cities as in the suburbs, because the most qualified teachers have no interest in teaching there.
In Michigan they have a student loan forgiveness if you teach in a high-poverty low income area for teachers.

That's great. How many takers?
Probably every teacher teaching in a inner city school. Why wouldn't they take advantage of that program?
 

Forum List

Back
Top