When Did Liberalism Become Fascism?

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Fascism is a good thing.

How do you use individual freedom to combat Capitalist Liberalism spreading by Hollywood, and the media, as well as Capitalists hiring illegal immigrants, outsourcing jobs, and supporting feminism for cheap labor profits.

The answer is you don't.

Social Conservatives have been duped by the Capitalists.

"Fascism is a good thing."

What an imbecile.

So, what's your solutions to the Capitalists wrecking the U.S.A?

Do nothing, right?

Conservatives are weak, and stupid.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"When did Liberalism become Fascism?"

Just about the same time you found the bottom of your Vodka bottle.

So....you can't find a single error to point to in my posts?

That's because there are none.

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

 

[toxicmedia]

Fascism is a good thing.

How do you use individual freedom to combat Capitalist Liberalism spreading by Hollywood, and the media, as well as Capitalists hiring illegal immigrants, outsourcing jobs, and supporting feminism for cheap labor profits.

The answer is you don't.

Social Conservatives have been duped by the Capitalists.

"Fascism is a good thing."

What an imbecile.

I think there is a vast gulf between what you're told Liberals say....and what they actually say, or mean.

Between the unsupported conclusions and out of context statements you have seen....reality for Liberals seems to bear little, if no, resemblance to what you're saying

 

[BlindBoo]

Capitalism is wrecking the U.S.A, the Capitalists need to be put on a short-leash.

Wrecking the USA? How?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

When Did Liberalism Become Fascism?.........it never did.

Fascists hate Liberals, and visa versa.

Your woeful lack of objectivity and fairness has allowed you to accept the redefinitions of "Fascism" that Conservative media and strategists have offered.

Revisions offered largely to assuage the similarities between post 911 Evangelical/Tea Party Republicans and Fascists.

That's kind of a long winded way to say "I know you are but what am I"

The OP points out the outrage from a real Liberal, Kirsten Powers, and a conservative, Kimberley Strassel.

What are left are comments from the Fascists in mufti.....

...raise your paw.

I simply responded to the hyperbolic assertion within the title of your thread.

I'm weary of how the crap you cut-n-paste after that rarely supports the assertion

How about you try the truth....as a change?

You were irked, bothered, wounded by the truth that I've posted....it's undeniable and unassailable.

If that were not the case, you wouldn't be here.





Now....what is you faux objection to 'cut and paste,' you dunce?

1. If there were not a cogent, well constructed thesis that destroys your Liberal worldview, you would not have come slithering out from under your rock.

2. The phrase 'cut and paste' is an attempted pejorative reference to a well supported post buttressed with quotes, links and sources.



3. Let's see what real authority has to say:

a. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)
Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

b. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(LibGuides: Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis)

c. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml
websites.wnc.edu/~kille/Fred/researchpaper.rtf

Wasn't that masterful????



4. Now that we have established your motive and method, why is it you cannot dispute my efforts???
Is it based on stupidity, lack of education, or simply that you have never been correct?

 

[Hum Dinger]

"When did Liberalism become Fascism?"

Just about the same time you found the bottom of your Vodka bottle.

So....you can't find a single error to point to in my posts?

That's because there are none.

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"When did Liberalism become Fascism?"

Just about the same time you found the bottom of your Vodka bottle.

So....you can't find a single error to point to in my posts?

That's because there are none.

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

1. "....you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny."

Why would I do that, when it gave me the opportunity to pummel you once again!



2. "Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

You've never had the ability for same.

You're simply a Liberal dunce.....unless that phrase is redundant.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Just about the same time you found the bottom of your Vodka bottle.

So....you can't find a single error to point to in my posts?

That's because there are none.

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

1. "....you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny."

Why would I do that, when it gave me the opportunity to pummel you once again!



2. "Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

You've never had the ability for same.

You're simply a Liberal dunce.....unless that phrase is redundant.

You're either a humorless old crow or my reference to your Vodka bottle hit a bit too close to home...probably both.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So....you can't find a single error to point to in my posts?

That's because there are none.

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

1. "....you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny."

Why would I do that, when it gave me the opportunity to pummel you once again!



2. "Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

You've never had the ability for same.

You're simply a Liberal dunce.....unless that phrase is redundant.

You're either a humorless old crow or my reference to your Vodka bottle hit a bit too close to home...probably both.

"Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

Why are you back, you dolt????


You've been dissed, and dismissed.

 

[francoHFW]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Your primary error is that you've apparently started another bottle of Vodka.

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

1. "....you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny."

Why would I do that, when it gave me the opportunity to pummel you once again!



2. "Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

You've never had the ability for same.

You're simply a Liberal dunce.....unless that phrase is redundant.

You're either a humorless old crow or my reference to your Vodka bottle hit a bit too close to home...probably both.

"Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

Why are you back, you dolt????


You've been dissed, and dismissed.

OMFG! PoliticalChic has dismissed me!

Kind of authoritarian for a person that's accusing other people of being fascists...don't you think?

All hail PoliticalChic the Fuhrer of USMB! I must go now...I've been dismissed!

NOT!

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

"I have a Masters in History 1990..."
And, yet....you know nothing.

A sign of the low level of 'higher education,' eh?


You lesson today is a quiz:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.



Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism



Here's the explanation for the fabrications you've 'learned'....

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. "Your primary error...."
I never make any errors.
I'm never wrong.....I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

2. You've inadvertently helped prove that I'm never wrong.

Let's review the fact that your post reveals:

Liberals are first and foremost liars, and lying is a necessity because, in debate, conservatives eat your lunch. Your most common fabrication: ["Your primary error...."] fails a simple test:
in not being able to demonstrate/prove any errors, you prove to be the one making the error.
That's called logic.

What you've done, quite clearly, is prove that you're an idiot.

Responding so seriously to my OBVIOUSLY HUMOROUS post shows what a total moron you are.

If you had a brain, you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny.

Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate, so I'm taking some humorous jabs here and there. Any intelligent person could tell the difference. Obviously you can not.

1. "....you would have either ignored my post or marked it as funny."

Why would I do that, when it gave me the opportunity to pummel you once again!



2. "Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

You've never had the ability for same.

You're simply a Liberal dunce.....unless that phrase is redundant.

You're either a humorless old crow or my reference to your Vodka bottle hit a bit too close to home...probably both.

"Today, I'm not in the mood for any serious debate.."

Why are you back, you dolt????


You've been dissed, and dismissed.

OMFG! PoliticalChic has dismissed me!

Kind of authoritarian for a person that's accusing other people of being fascists...don't you think?

All hail PoliticalChic the Fuhrer of USMB! I must go now...I've been dismissed!

NOT!

In the future....please refer to me as the Empress.

And now....bow your way out without turning your back.....

 

[Hum Dinger]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

Did you post that chart because it's how you see the political spectrum or to show the narrative pushed by the 'New BS GOP propaganda machine'.

Either way, I do not see socialism as being more restricting on personal freedom. If anything socialism enhances personal freedom. I realize that for may years conservatives have pushed the narrative that socialism restricts personal freedom...so much so that all too many people believe it, but it just ain;t so.

For example:

1. The installation of the Federal highway system was a 'socialist' project, yet it enhances our personal freedom.
2. The installation of a robust public transportation system would enhance everyone's personal freedom.
3. A socialized medical system would greatly enhance our personal freedoms.

The only personal freedom that socialism restricts is the freedom to horde wealth and to not contribute to society.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

Nazi Germany was Socialist, though.

The German Labour Front, and Council of Trust prove it.

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

 

[francoHFW]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

"I have a Masters in History 1990..."
And, yet....you know nothing.

A sign of the low level of 'higher education,' eh?


You lesson today is a quiz:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.



Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism



Here's the explanation for the fabrications you've 'learned'....

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Goldberg is the author of "Liberal Fascism" and a joke in serious political/history circles. Like you morons...

 

[Hum Dinger]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

Nazi Germany was Socialist, though.

The German Labour Front, and Council of Trust prove it.

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

The Nazis may have had some quasi-socialist policies, but they were not socialists. In fact Hitler HATED socialists. The first groups of people Hitler had arrested were socialists and liberals.

In fact, the Nazis had no real economic ideology. They were extreme nationalists hellbent on avenging WWI and persecuted anyone that they felt supported the overthrow of the Kaiser and the first two post WWI governments - which were mainly socialists and liberals.

The Nazis simply didn't have a strong economic ideology, in some ways they weren't even true fascists - in the sense of Mussolini Fascism.

They were absolutely dictatorial, but capitalism thrived under the Nazis.

 

[francoHFW]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

Did you post that chart because it's how you see the political spectrum or to show the narrative pushed by the 'New BS GOP propaganda machine'.

Either way, I do not see socialism as being more restricting on personal freedom. If anything socialism enhances personal freedom. I realize that for may years conservatives have pushed the narrative that socialism restricts personal freedom...so much so that all too many people believe it, but it just ain;t so.

For example:

1. The installation of the Federal highway system was a 'socialist' project, yet it enhances our personal freedom.
2. The installation of a robust public transportation system would enhance everyone's personal freedom.
3. A socialized medical system would greatly enhance our personal freedoms.

The only personal freedom that socialism restricts is the freedom to horde wealth and to not contribute to society.

I'm a socialist, which today is defined around the world as always democratic, fair capitalism. That's the respected, traditional political spectrum. Though it's often like a horse shoe, with anarchy outside- as fascism and communism can begin to resemble each other- to MORONS lol. Here's the New BS GOP "LF" version:

 

[BlindBoo]

1. On the Right, the Founders, classical Liberals, and conservatives, all of whom pay homage to the Constitution, which prominently promises this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

On the Left, Progressivism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism....and Fascism.
None of these adhere to, support or even give a nod to freedom.
All of them demand the bending of the neck and the knee to the collective.


2. Liberal Kirsten Powers wrote the most excellent best seller,
"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech."



3. The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel has just penned an essay called,
"The Left’s War on Free Speech," part of which includes the most elemental description of politics today, explained through the words of her children.

"....three kids, ages twelve, nine, and five....a volley of protests about free speech rights....I asked each of them in turn to tell me what they thought “free speech” meant.


a. The twelve-year-old went first. A serious and academic child, he gave a textbook definition that included “Congress shall make no law,” an evocation of James Madison, a tutorial on the Bill of Rights, and warnings about “certain exceptions for public safety and libel.” I was happy to know the private-school fees were yielding something.

b. The nine-year-old went next. A rebel convinced that everyone ignores her, she said that she had no idea what “public safety” or “libel” were, but that “it doesn’t matter, because free speech means there should never be any restrictions on anything that anybody says, anytime or anywhere.”

c. ...the five-year-old’s turn. You could tell she’d been thinking hard about her answer. She fixed both her brother and sister with a ferocious stare and said: “Free speech is that you can say what you want—as long as I like it.”




4. I realized that my oldest was a constitutional conservative, my middle child a libertarian, and my youngest a socialist with totalitarian tendencies."
The Left’s War on Free Speech

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

Nazi Germany was Socialist, though.

The German Labour Front, and Council of Trust prove it.

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

Well at least Hitler and his gang took over a party with Socialist in its name. But when he took over Germany and turned it into a fascist dictatorship, it was anything but socialist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Progressivism has ALWAYS been fascist. Liberalism isn't.

P and L have ALWAYS been lefty, Fascism always RW. Welcome to reality- Not bs GOP propaganda of the last 15 years....

Wrong again little hater dupe. There is no RW/LW. There is collectivist vs individualist. If you are for authoritarian government you are left wing. Period. The ultimate form of right wing government is NO GOVERNMENT. In other words anarchy. But hater dupes like you have no clue. You just parrot the crap your progressive asshats shove up your keester.

I have a Masters in History 1990- before all your new GOP BS was even made up. The true political spectrum also includes an economic part, LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism. You have a masters in RW GOP BS, dupes. Popularized by "Liberal Fascism" ("Absolute drivel"- the Economist) and the New BS GOP propaganda machine...a disgrace.

"I have a Masters in History 1990..."
And, yet....you know nothing.

A sign of the low level of 'higher education,' eh?


You lesson today is a quiz:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.



Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism



Here's the explanation for the fabrications you've 'learned'....

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Goldberg is the author of "Liberal Fascism" and a joke in serious political/history circles. Like you morons...

You seem to have ignored the lesson.

That method accounts for the depth of your lacunae.